From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QyJuU-0001Q0-El for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 08:43:06 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 91AFC21C251; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 08:42:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from svr-us4.tirtonadi.com (unknown [69.65.43.212]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 125FD21C246 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 08:41:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ew0-f53.google.com ([209.85.215.53]) by svr-us4.tirtonadi.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QyJtK-001X0I-86 for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 15:41:54 +0700 Received: by ewy8 with SMTP id 8so3150479ewy.40 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 01:41:48 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.61.211 with SMTP id u19mr106596fah.102.1314693708735; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 01:41:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.79.10 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 01:41:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E5C9874.6060505@darkmetatron.de> References: <20110830022716.GC6313@solfire> <20110830032927.GF6313@solfire> <4E5C9874.6060505@darkmetatron.de> Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 15:41:48 +0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Important package blocked by another important package From: Pandu Poluan To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - svr-us4.tirtonadi.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - lists.gentoo.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - poluan.info X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: a243e4325b3382bd7acf527b8f8ae3a0 Because I don't know Meino's arch ;) Or, to be more precise, I have a common package.accept_keywords for all my Gentoo systems, some of them x86 and others amd64, so it's a habit of mine to unmask both :) Rgds, On 2011-08-30, Sebastian Be=C3=9Fler wrote: > Am 30.08.2011 09:15, schrieb Pandu Poluan: > >> Personally, I'd put '<=3Dsys-apps/sysvinit-2.88-r99 ~amd64 ~x86' in that >> file. I have the conviction that versions with greater '-r' would be >> better, since it's a revision to the same version. > > '~sys-apps/sysvinit-2.88 ~amd64 ~x86' does the same as ~ matches on all > '-r' of a specific version so in this case it matches everything from > sys-apps/sysvinit-2.88-r1 to sys-apps/sysvinit-2.88-r999999 (and even abo= ve) > > Why unmask for two arches ~amd64 and ~x86? > > Greetings > > Sebastian > > --=20 -- Pandu E Poluan - IT Optimizer My website: http://pandu.poluan.info/