From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-130676-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1RNCTw-00040V-9O
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 23:50:32 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 24DDB21C1CC;
	Sun,  6 Nov 2011 23:50:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from svr-us4.tirtonadi.com (svr-us4.tirtonadi.com [69.65.43.212])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E77A021C179
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun,  6 Nov 2011 23:49:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-fx0-f53.google.com ([209.85.161.53])
	by svr-us4.tirtonadi.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <pandu@poluan.info>)
	id 1RNCSr-002ALo-Iy
	for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 06:49:25 +0700
Received: by faan15 with SMTP id n15so1959324faa.40
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 15:49:22 -0800 (PST)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.91.68 with SMTP id l4mr42605627fam.16.1320623362134; Sun,
 06 Nov 2011 15:49:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.223.74.16 with HTTP; Sun, 6 Nov 2011 15:49:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.223.74.16 with HTTP; Sun, 6 Nov 2011 15:49:22 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4EB4013C.8010000@orlitzky.com>
References: <CAA2qdGVJss8DC7tKy-oUWt+_OVxSq7vwKegk9sMDFE1Ky1KygQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<4EB4013C.8010000@orlitzky.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 06:49:22 +0700
Message-ID: <CAA2qdGWAfpk8ymZeVVBNVX6nXvBPM6Mhw4us5fAuQ4=vn3LJnw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Any experience with RhodeCode?
From: Pandu Poluan <pandu@poluan.info>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015174489fc61d46a04b119967a
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - svr-us4.tirtonadi.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - lists.gentoo.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - poluan.info
X-Archives-Salt: d6499d91-f622-4b1c-9767-dc71e2aafd0e
X-Archives-Hash: c4f9a6a56a0470751f82938326f71eb7

--0015174489fc61d46a04b119967a
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Nov 4, 2011 10:17 PM, "Michael Orlitzky" <michael@orlitzky.com> wrote:
>
> On 11/04/2011 11:00 AM, Pandu Poluan wrote:
> > I'm looking for a nice, lightweight way to implement a Mercurial server.
> > Somehow, installing a heavyweight webserver just for Mercurial seems
> > so... wasteful.
>
> If it's not for public use, you can clone/pull/whatever over SSH.
>

That's news to me... so I don't have to install a Mercurial server at all?

That said, having seen the demo version of RhodeCode, I kind of like it's
web-based interface. And the Active Directory integration also seems nice
(my company's dev team is predominantly Windows).

Rgds,

--0015174489fc61d46a04b119967a
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8

<p><br>
On Nov 4, 2011 10:17 PM, &quot;Michael Orlitzky&quot; &lt;<a href="mailto:michael@orlitzky.com">michael@orlitzky.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; On 11/04/2011 11:00 AM, Pandu Poluan wrote:<br>
&gt; &gt; I&#39;m looking for a nice, lightweight way to implement a Mercurial server.<br>
&gt; &gt; Somehow, installing a heavyweight webserver just for Mercurial seems<br>
&gt; &gt; so... wasteful.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; If it&#39;s not for public use, you can clone/pull/whatever over SSH.<br>
&gt;</p>
<p>That&#39;s news to me... so I don&#39;t have to install a Mercurial server at all?</p>
<p>That said, having seen the demo version of RhodeCode, I kind of like it&#39;s web-based interface. And the Active Directory integration also seems nice (my company&#39;s dev team is predominantly Windows).</p>
<p>Rgds,<br>
</p>

--0015174489fc61d46a04b119967a--