From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C30F1381F3 for ; Sun, 11 Nov 2012 14:37:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8820C21C07C; Sun, 11 Nov 2012 14:37:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from svr-us4.tirtonadi.com (svr-us4.tirtonadi.com [69.65.43.212]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F00E421C02C for ; Sun, 11 Nov 2012 14:36:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pb0-f53.google.com ([209.85.160.53]:64988) by svr-us4.tirtonadi.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TXYe4-004Fs5-9x for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 11 Nov 2012 21:36:20 +0700 Received: by mail-pb0-f53.google.com with SMTP id wz12so3713684pbc.40 for ; Sun, 11 Nov 2012 06:36:16 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.66.73.226 with SMTP id o2mr41205873pav.83.1352644576355; Sun, 11 Nov 2012 06:36:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.68.233.136 with HTTP; Sun, 11 Nov 2012 06:36:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.68.233.136 with HTTP; Sun, 11 Nov 2012 06:36:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <6643416.ieWHk1LYWX@gentoo> References: <509FAA4E.9040404@coolmail.se> <6643416.ieWHk1LYWX@gentoo> Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2012 21:36:16 +0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [ANNOUNCE] I like systemd now :) From: Pandu Poluan To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d042f91e67b267b04ce391b54 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - svr-us4.tirtonadi.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - lists.gentoo.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - poluan.info X-Archives-Salt: 6833d5fa-80d1-49b5-8035-11588090a5aa X-Archives-Hash: e28ee9d2b1add1a3b499a60c5612fafe --f46d042f91e67b267b04ce391b54 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Nov 11, 2012 9:22 PM, "=E5=BE=AE=E8=94=A1" = wrote: > > =E5=9C=A8 2012=E5=B9=B411=E6=9C=8811=E6=97=A5 =E6=98=9F=E6=9C=9F=E6=97=A5= 13:59:50=EF=BC=8CJorge Almeida =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > > On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 1:38 PM, pk wrote: > > > On 2012-11-11 13:24, Jorge Almeida wrote: > > >> or later, but isn't it a nice coincidence that this perl is a product of > > >> the same totalitarian mindset that is determined to poison Linux? > > > > > > Can't we just calm down and try to be reasonably nice? I really didn'= t > > > intend to start a flame war here... I just reacted without thinking and > > > for that I apologise. > > > > You don't have anything to apologise for, you didn't offend anyone. I shall > > not apologise for reacting in strong terms to the intervention of someone > > who thinks he is entitled to tell people who don't share his fancy to g= o > > away. > > You over reacted. > No, it was you ('you' here referring to microcai/=E5=BE=AE=E8=94=A1) who fi= rst trolled. Everyone tends to react very strongly to trolls. And shills. Read again your posting. You used words like 'byebye hater' and even went out your way of accusing someone of being paid to hate something... ... yet you didn't post any tech points at all! I was often at odds with Canek, and the discussion sometimes got heated, but we keep countering with tech stuffs, codes, and many tech (edge) cases. You, instead, did an ad hominem without debating technical merits. So, don't blame people doing ad hominem attacks to you in reciprocal. Rgds, -- --f46d042f91e67b267b04ce391b54 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Nov 11, 2012 9:22 PM, "=E5=BE=AE=E8=94=A1" <microcai@fedoraproject.org> wrote: >
> =E5=9C=A8 2012=E5=B9=B411=E6=9C=8811=E6=97=A5 =E6=98=9F=E6=9C=9F=E6=97= =A5 13:59:50=EF=BC=8CJorge Almeida =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A
> > On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 1:38 PM, pk <peterk2@coolmail.se> wrote:
> > > On 2012-11-11 13:24, Jorge Almeida wrote:
> > >> or later, but isn't it a nice coincidence that this = perl is a product of
> > >> the same totalitarian mindset that is determined to pois= on Linux?
> > >
> > > Can't we just calm down and try to be reasonably nice? I= really didn't
> > > intend to start a flame war here... I just reacted without t= hinking and
> > > for that I apologise.
> >
> > You don't have anything to apologise for, you didn't offe= nd anyone. I shall
> > not apologise for reacting in strong terms to the intervention of= someone
> > who thinks he is entitled to tell people who don't share his = fancy to go
> > away.
>
> You over reacted.
>

No, it was you ('you' here referring to microcai/=E5=BE=AE=E8=94= =A1) who first trolled.

Everyone tends to react very strongly to trolls. And shills.

Read again your posting. You used words like 'byebye hater' and = even went out your way of accusing someone of being paid to hate something.= ..

... yet you didn't post any tech points at all!

I was often at odds with Canek, and the discussion sometimes got heated,= but we keep countering with tech stuffs, codes, and many tech (edge) cases= .

You, instead, did an ad hominem without debating technical merits. So, d= on't blame people doing ad hominem attacks to you in reciprocal.

Rgds,
--

--f46d042f91e67b267b04ce391b54--