From: Pandu Poluan <pandu@poluan.info>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: eudev - is it a viable *long-term* option? - WAS: Re: [gentoo-user] Updating our live servers. I'm scared!
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2013 00:41:57 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA2qdGVcA6Z1i8UUtxWWE1V0n3MuSbbaaecT1WDRd3-mYyCUvA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5156FAF0.5030103@libertytrek.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1024 bytes --]
On Mar 30, 2013 9:48 PM, "Tanstaafl" <tanstaafl@libertytrek.org> wrote:
>
> I should have added that this is for a server (not hardened), so I don't
care about hot plug this or that, I just care about stability and
reliability with respect to updates not breaking booting capability...
>
>
> On 2013-03-30 10:39 AM, Tanstaafl <tanstaafl@libertytrek.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 2013-03-28 2:15 PM, Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Just a thought. Have you thought about switching to eudev? That would
>>> solve some udev issues. Since you are running a hardened profile and
>>> servers, may not be a option tho.
>>
>>
>> I'm curious...
>>
>> Is eudev still being 'maintained'? Does it still have any advantages
>> over the new udev?
>>
>> I'm mostly concerned about getting so far behind that I end up in an
>> untenable situation... ie, eudev dies in 1+ years, and the changes
>> between now and then make it virtually to update to whatever is the new
>> way...
>>
>
>
All my servers use mdev.
'nuff said.
Rgds,
--
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1529 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-30 17:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-28 15:38 [gentoo-user] Updating our live servers. I'm scared! Nick Khamis
2013-03-28 16:04 ` Joshua Murphy
2013-03-28 16:30 ` Nick Khamis
2013-03-28 16:48 ` Michael Orlitzky
2013-03-28 16:56 ` Nick Khamis
2013-03-28 17:08 ` Michael Orlitzky
2013-03-28 17:16 ` Nick Khamis
2013-03-28 17:33 ` Michael Orlitzky
2013-03-28 17:43 ` Nick Khamis
2013-03-28 17:49 ` Michael Orlitzky
2013-03-28 17:58 ` Yuri K. Shatroff
2013-03-28 18:00 ` Nick Khamis
2013-03-28 18:03 ` Nick Khamis
2013-03-28 18:10 ` Nick Khamis
2013-03-28 18:15 ` Dale
2013-03-28 18:27 ` Nick Khamis
2013-03-28 19:05 ` Dale
2013-03-30 14:39 ` eudev - is it a viable *long-term* option? - WAS: " Tanstaafl
2013-03-30 14:47 ` Tanstaafl
2013-03-30 16:42 ` Dale
2013-03-30 17:41 ` Pandu Poluan [this message]
2013-03-31 16:55 ` Tanstaafl
2013-03-31 17:05 ` Dale
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAA2qdGVcA6Z1i8UUtxWWE1V0n3MuSbbaaecT1WDRd3-mYyCUvA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=pandu@poluan.info \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox