From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-145421-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C62E4138ACE
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 04:12:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CA943E05D5;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 04:12:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from svr-us4.tirtonadi.com (svr-us4.tirtonadi.com [69.65.43.212])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 816CCE0507
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 04:12:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-vc0-f180.google.com ([209.85.220.180]:58889)
by svr-us4.tirtonadi.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.80)
(envelope-from <pandu@poluan.info>)
id 1U7eYt-001x3V-Jy
for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:12:12 +0700
Received: by mail-vc0-f180.google.com with SMTP id fo13so3956303vcb.25
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:12:09 -0800 (PST)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.177.163 with SMTP id cr3mr16354658vdc.94.1361247129825;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:12:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.220.140.145 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:12:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.220.140.145 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:12:09 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CA+czFiCSWSFCgE5BQ2bH6uKEozPg=yMetjj4cBGomYZQJW35rQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <5122D698.7090606@googlemail.com>
<CA+czFiCSWSFCgE5BQ2bH6uKEozPg=yMetjj4cBGomYZQJW35rQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:12:09 +0700
Message-ID: <CAA2qdGVbRr_02e2ft44bKW+WjPSPg_Tmj-NJJ71+vNPMy4vAXA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] firehol + gentoo 3.6.11 kernel....
From: Pandu Poluan <pandu@poluan.info>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3071cc969ff37404d60c0bf9
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - svr-us4.tirtonadi.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - lists.gentoo.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - poluan.info
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: svr-us4.tirtonadi.com: authenticated_id: rileyer+pandu.poluan.info/only user confirmed/virtual account not confirmed
X-Archives-Salt: 0def621c-4b3b-4a14-b8c1-9890bb82eb4b
X-Archives-Hash: 5353ad075de6bbfa4422c20822eaf80d
--20cf3071cc969ff37404d60c0bf9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Feb 19, 2013 9:10 AM, "Michael Mol" <mikemol@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Feb 18, 2013 8:35 PM, "Tamer Higazi" <th982a@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >
> > hi people!
> > I have used all the time "firehol" (gentoo sources 3.3.8) to make my
> > firewall rules. After kernel 3.4.x I can't make use of it any more.
> >
> > Has anyone of you got firehol running on a genoo system with a 3.4.x
> > kernel above to run?
> > And if not, can you adivse me something similiar to build linux firewal=
l
> > rules ?!
> >
> > For a short reply I would thank you.
> >
> >
> >
> > Tamer
> >
>
> I use a fork of firehol, based on Phil Whineray's IPv6 patches...but on
Debian. I'll see about getting it working on Gentoo, and let you know.
Perhaps I can get it (or Phil's version) into the tree.
Pah! Real Men=E2=84=A2 hack iptables rules directly with their hands, not u=
sing
baby walkers...
LOL, just kidding. What's the firehol fork's name in Debian? I'm interested
to see how it looks like now...
(About 4 years ago, these tools are so dismal I created one myself, failed
miserably, and just code the rules up by hand.)
Rgds,
--
--20cf3071cc969ff37404d60c0bf9
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<p><br>
On Feb 19, 2013 9:10 AM, "Michael Mol" <<a href=3D"mailto:mike=
mol@gmail.com">mikemol@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> On Feb 18, 2013 8:35 PM, "Tamer Higazi" <<a href=3D"mailt=
o:th982a@googlemail.com">th982a@googlemail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> ><br>
> > hi people!<br>
> > I have used all the time "firehol" (gentoo sources 3.3.=
8) to make my<br>
> > firewall rules. After kernel 3.4.x I can't make use of it any=
more.<br>
> ><br>
> > Has anyone of you got firehol running on a genoo system with a 3.=
4.x<br>
> > kernel above to run?<br>
> > And if not, can you adivse me something similiar to build linux f=
irewall<br>
> > rules ?!<br>
> ><br>
> > For a short reply I would thank you.<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > Tamer<br>
> ><br>
><br>
> I use a fork of firehol, based on Phil Whineray's IPv6 patches...b=
ut on Debian. I'll see about getting it working on Gentoo, and let you =
know. Perhaps I can get it (or Phil's version) into the tree.</p>
<p>Pah! Real Men=E2=84=A2 hack iptables rules directly with their hands, no=
t using baby walkers...</p>
<p>LOL, just kidding. What's the firehol fork's name in Debian? I&#=
39;m interested to see how it looks like now...</p>
<p>(About 4 years ago, these tools are so dismal I created one myself, fail=
ed miserably, and just code the rules up by hand.)</p>
<p>Rgds,<br>
-- </p>
--20cf3071cc969ff37404d60c0bf9--