From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RVSCE-0000e3-33 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 18:14:22 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6F7A021C06D; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 18:13:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from svr-us4.tirtonadi.com (svr-us4.tirtonadi.com [69.65.43.212]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E33E21C04B for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 18:12:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bw0-f53.google.com ([209.85.214.53]) by svr-us4.tirtonadi.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RVSAJ-001tF0-CB for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 01:12:23 +0700 Received: by bkaq10 with SMTP id q10so12261091bka.40 for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 10:12:17 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.133.207 with SMTP id g15mr50398521bkt.139.1322590337424; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 10:12:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.96.72 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 10:12:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.96.72 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 10:12:17 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1322588855.15879.3.camel@stretch> References: <4ED28F6A.7090606@alyf.net> <1322483386.66469.4.camel@stretch> <4ED3BDD4.4060704@binarywings.net> <4ED3E7B5.8090403@binarywings.net> <4ED5175F.5030800@alyf.net> <1322588855.15879.3.camel@stretch> Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 01:12:17 +0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: What happened to OpenRC 0.9.6? From: Pandu Poluan To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175cd0883edffb04b2e38f30 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - svr-us4.tirtonadi.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - lists.gentoo.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - poluan.info X-Archives-Salt: 8cd1ab91-9796-4618-a6a3-10a5752bd6b0 X-Archives-Hash: 8496591165691547ffd528638bd4b757 --0015175cd0883edffb04b2e38f30 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Nov 30, 2011 12:51 AM, "Albert W. Hopkins" wrote: > > On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 18:33 +0100, Andrea Conti wrote: > > I was just a little surprised that a system package turned out to be > > completely broken in a scenario that I thought was quite widespread, > > especially among the devs (as rc_parallel results in _very_ tangible > > time savings, especially on a desktop with lots of services and > > frequent > > boots). > > I have desktops and have not seen any noticable difference in startup > times with rc_parallel. The config file even says "slight speed" > improvement, then goes on with a *huge* caveat as if to say "yeah, you > might see a little difference, but it's probably not worth it for most > people". > > Basically I take that to mean, it *may* speed things up slightly for > some people. If it works for you, great for you. If it breaks, you get > to pick up the pieces. > On my server boxen, rc_parallel gives a very tangible benefit. The boot time gets cut by roughly half. Rgds, --0015175cd0883edffb04b2e38f30 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Nov 30, 2011 12:51 AM, "Albert W. Hopkins" <marduk@letterboxes.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 18:33 +0100, Andrea Conti wrote:
> > I was just a little surprised that a system package turned out to= be
> > completely broken in a scenario that I thought was quite widespre= ad,
> > especially among the devs (as rc_parallel results in _very_ tangi= ble
> > time savings, especially on a desktop with lots of services and > > frequent
> > boots).
>
> I have desktops and have not seen any noticable difference in startup<= br> > times with rc_parallel. =C2=A0The config file even says "slight s= peed"
> improvement, then goes on with a *huge* caveat as if to say "yeah= , you
> might see a little difference, but it's probably not worth it for = most
> people".
>
> Basically I take that to mean, it *may* speed things up slightly for > some people. =C2=A0If it works for you, great for you. =C2=A0If it bre= aks, you get
> to pick up the pieces.
>

On my server boxen, rc_parallel gives a very tangible benefit. The boot = time gets cut by roughly half.

Rgds,

--0015175cd0883edffb04b2e38f30--