From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-132078-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1RXjRv-0002K7-26
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2011 01:03:59 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8413C21C0A2;
Tue, 6 Dec 2011 01:03:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from svr-us4.tirtonadi.com (svr-us4.tirtonadi.com [69.65.43.212])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F57721C159
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 6 Dec 2011 01:02:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-bw0-f53.google.com ([209.85.214.53])
by svr-us4.tirtonadi.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <pandu@poluan.info>)
id 1RXjPz-000ehD-CA
for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2011 08:01:59 +0700
Received: by bkbzu5 with SMTP id zu5so6619256bkb.40
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 05 Dec 2011 17:01:54 -0800 (PST)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.180.85.162 with SMTP id i2mr15143793wiz.22.1323133314293; Mon,
05 Dec 2011 17:01:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.223.103.70 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Dec 2011 17:01:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.223.103.70 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Dec 2011 17:01:54 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4EDD6749.8030301@orlitzky.com>
References: <CAN0CFw11Fh48TzBLst=TWz5ccDpEdOgmQKfr50ZRX8T8nTmrQg@mail.gmail.com>
<4EDAA89F.3090308@orlitzky.com>
<CAA2qdGV1NXgAB5AM4WA5uugnq-Bg0JBxED7jmAxkfrB23Rn_LA@mail.gmail.com>
<4EDAD845.4010402@orlitzky.com>
<CAN0CFw2oS5s6PrVPhYB7U58wR+m--q8hAzN4vcuF+PKFuO8f0Q@mail.gmail.com>
<CAA2qdGU4=NQcUrFhyGrs5Qqh3dz=ooXucwmQWsA2OESUpWVr5g@mail.gmail.com>
<4EDD6749.8030301@orlitzky.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 08:01:54 +0700
Message-ID: <CAA2qdGVDsAmVe3SR5iyYvtHkbyxirRcQ_VnkpWdKz5Cr2jP9zg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] clamav and spamassassin
From: Pandu Poluan <pandu@poluan.info>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0444e9cb305e0304b361fbdb
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - svr-us4.tirtonadi.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - lists.gentoo.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - poluan.info
X-Archives-Salt: 15d024aa-8da7-467b-a4d0-35a12ec1ba5a
X-Archives-Hash: 2c899c1c68333d0027dbc07dd65b7d6f
--f46d0444e9cb305e0304b361fbdb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On Dec 6, 2011 7:58 AM, "Michael Orlitzky" <michael@orlitzky.com> wrote:
>
> On 12/05/2011 07:45 PM, Pandu Poluan wrote:
>>
>>
>> >
>> > I've looked up each of those parameters and they sound fine to me.
>> > How long have you been running them? Have you been notified of any
>> > mistakenly rejected mail? It's very important my server doesn't miss
>> > any mail, even if it means dealing with more spam.
>> >
>>
>> Similar situation with me. Because my company is in the financial
>> sector, false negatives are much more preferred than false positives.
>>
>
> I have never had a false positive report that I traced back to one of the
postscreen deep protocol tests.
>
> That being said, they've only been in place for ~4 months.
>
Four months without a false positive? Good enough for me. Where do I sign?
:-)
Rgds,
--f46d0444e9cb305e0304b361fbdb
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<p><br>
On Dec 6, 2011 7:58 AM, "Michael Orlitzky" <<a href=3D"mailto:=
michael@orlitzky.com">michael@orlitzky.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> On 12/05/2011 07:45 PM, Pandu Poluan wrote:<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> =C2=A0><br>
>> =C2=A0> I've looked up each of those parameters and they so=
und fine to me.<br>
>> =C2=A0> How long have you been running them? =C2=A0Have you bee=
n notified of any<br>
>> =C2=A0> mistakenly rejected mail? =C2=A0It's very important=
my server doesn't miss<br>
>> =C2=A0> any mail, even if it means dealing with more spam.<br>
>> =C2=A0><br>
>><br>
>> Similar situation with me. Because my company is in the financial<=
br>
>> sector, false negatives are much more preferred than false positiv=
es.<br>
>><br>
><br>
> I have never had a false positive report that I traced back to one of =
the postscreen deep protocol tests.<br>
><br>
> That being said, they've only been in place for ~4 months.<br>
></p>
<p>Four months without a false positive? Good enough for me. Where do I sig=
n? :-) </p>
<p>Rgds,<br>
</p>
--f46d0444e9cb305e0304b361fbdb--