From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RXjRv-0002K7-26 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2011 01:03:59 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8413C21C0A2; Tue, 6 Dec 2011 01:03:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from svr-us4.tirtonadi.com (svr-us4.tirtonadi.com [69.65.43.212]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F57721C159 for ; Tue, 6 Dec 2011 01:02:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bw0-f53.google.com ([209.85.214.53]) by svr-us4.tirtonadi.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RXjPz-000ehD-CA for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2011 08:01:59 +0700 Received: by bkbzu5 with SMTP id zu5so6619256bkb.40 for ; Mon, 05 Dec 2011 17:01:54 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.85.162 with SMTP id i2mr15143793wiz.22.1323133314293; Mon, 05 Dec 2011 17:01:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.103.70 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Dec 2011 17:01:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.103.70 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Dec 2011 17:01:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4EDD6749.8030301@orlitzky.com> References: <4EDAA89F.3090308@orlitzky.com> <4EDAD845.4010402@orlitzky.com> <4EDD6749.8030301@orlitzky.com> Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 08:01:54 +0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] clamav and spamassassin From: Pandu Poluan To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0444e9cb305e0304b361fbdb X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - svr-us4.tirtonadi.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - lists.gentoo.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - poluan.info X-Archives-Salt: 15d024aa-8da7-467b-a4d0-35a12ec1ba5a X-Archives-Hash: 2c899c1c68333d0027dbc07dd65b7d6f --f46d0444e9cb305e0304b361fbdb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Dec 6, 2011 7:58 AM, "Michael Orlitzky" wrote: > > On 12/05/2011 07:45 PM, Pandu Poluan wrote: >> >> >> > >> > I've looked up each of those parameters and they sound fine to me. >> > How long have you been running them? Have you been notified of any >> > mistakenly rejected mail? It's very important my server doesn't miss >> > any mail, even if it means dealing with more spam. >> > >> >> Similar situation with me. Because my company is in the financial >> sector, false negatives are much more preferred than false positives. >> > > I have never had a false positive report that I traced back to one of the postscreen deep protocol tests. > > That being said, they've only been in place for ~4 months. > Four months without a false positive? Good enough for me. Where do I sign? :-) Rgds, --f46d0444e9cb305e0304b361fbdb Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Dec 6, 2011 7:58 AM, "Michael Orlitzky" <michael@orlitzky.com> wrote:
>
> On 12/05/2011 07:45 PM, Pandu Poluan wrote:
>>
>>
>> =C2=A0>
>> =C2=A0> I've looked up each of those parameters and they so= und fine to me.
>> =C2=A0> How long have you been running them? =C2=A0Have you bee= n notified of any
>> =C2=A0> mistakenly rejected mail? =C2=A0It's very important= my server doesn't miss
>> =C2=A0> any mail, even if it means dealing with more spam.
>> =C2=A0>
>>
>> Similar situation with me. Because my company is in the financial<= br> >> sector, false negatives are much more preferred than false positiv= es.
>>
>
> I have never had a false positive report that I traced back to one of = the postscreen deep protocol tests.
>
> That being said, they've only been in place for ~4 months.
>

Four months without a false positive? Good enough for me. Where do I sig= n? :-)

Rgds,

--f46d0444e9cb305e0304b361fbdb--