From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RCeym-0001aZ-WE for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2011 22:02:49 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 80AEC21C25E; Sat, 8 Oct 2011 22:02:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from svr-us4.tirtonadi.com (svr-us4.tirtonadi.com [69.65.43.212]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00DA321C054 for ; Sat, 8 Oct 2011 22:01:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bw0-f53.google.com ([209.85.214.53]) by svr-us4.tirtonadi.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RCexV-0029MW-Ml for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 09 Oct 2011 05:01:29 +0700 Received: by bkbzt12 with SMTP id zt12so8467446bkb.40 for ; Sat, 08 Oct 2011 15:01:25 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.65.68 with SMTP id h4mr20145938fai.24.1318111285900; Sat, 08 Oct 2011 15:01:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.74.130 with HTTP; Sat, 8 Oct 2011 15:01:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.74.130 with HTTP; Sat, 8 Oct 2011 15:01:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <84E18622-417F-4241-9F68-1B9E07967D03@stellar.eclipse.co.uk> References: <84E18622-417F-4241-9F68-1B9E07967D03@stellar.eclipse.co.uk> Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2011 05:01:25 +0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Anyone else using vimpager? From: Pandu Poluan To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001517447946f874a404aed0b2c1 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - svr-us4.tirtonadi.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - lists.gentoo.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - poluan.info X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: c59b93fa6e0dec42b946b539564e3b01 --001517447946f874a404aed0b2c1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Oct 9, 2011 5:05 AM, "Stroller" wrote: > > > On 8 October 2011, at 10:19, Pandu Poluan wrote: > > > I'm just wondering if there's anyone else -- beside me -- that uses vimpager > > for PAGER? > > Tried it, couldn't get along with it at all. I can't now recall why. > > Why do you ask? Well, there's no ebuild for vimpager in portage, and if there are other users, I might be interested in writing one. Rgds, --001517447946f874a404aed0b2c1 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8


On Oct 9, 2011 5:05 AM, "Stroller" <stroller@stellar.eclipse.co.uk> wrote:
>
>
> On 8 October 2011, at 10:19, Pandu Poluan wrote:
>
> > I'm just wondering if there's anyone else -- beside me -- that uses vimpager
> > for PAGER?
>
> Tried it, couldn't get along with it at all. I can't now recall why.
>
> Why do you ask?

Well, there's no ebuild for vimpager in portage, and if there are other users, I might be interested in writing one.

Rgds,

--001517447946f874a404aed0b2c1--