From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RWGvh-0007Sj-Jz for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2011 00:24:41 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D738E21C06F; Fri, 2 Dec 2011 00:24:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from svr-us4.tirtonadi.com (svr-us4.tirtonadi.com [69.65.43.212]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EAD521C020 for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2011 00:23:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bw0-f53.google.com ([209.85.214.53]) by svr-us4.tirtonadi.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RWGuV-002PBx-JM for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2011 07:23:27 +0700 Received: by bkbzu5 with SMTP id zu5so1738971bkb.40 for ; Thu, 01 Dec 2011 16:23:23 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.157.133 with SMTP id b5mr9556945bkx.121.1322785403264; Thu, 01 Dec 2011 16:23:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.87.71 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Dec 2011 16:23:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.87.71 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Dec 2011 16:23:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20111201194544.GD4455@waltdnes.org> References: <20111115062115.GA3262@waltdnes.org> <20111121104724.GC7461@waltdnes.org> <20111201194544.GD4455@waltdnes.org> Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 07:23:23 +0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Beta test Gentoo with mdev instead of udev; version 3 From: Pandu Poluan To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175ddaac135fb604b310fa23 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - svr-us4.tirtonadi.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - lists.gentoo.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - poluan.info X-Archives-Salt: 533058b4-d2ca-4351-a84c-e49ce3c55af7 X-Archives-Hash: 59d0c01d9d93d0c5d23e2a8b08ae9894 --0015175ddaac135fb604b310fa23 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Dec 2, 2011 2:50 AM, "Walter Dnes" wrote: > > Corrected "#!/sbin/busybox ash" to "#!/bin/busybox ash" in step 3. The > weird part is that my system actually booted and ran fine even with this > typo in the script. > Amazingly enough, my system also works. Albeit with two red asterisks during boot. But the errors only affected rc logging, so I didn't pursue the issue further. Then again, I don't need to do smarty exotic things in /sbin/linuxrc, so the kernel's default actions of automagically mounting /proc and /sys saved my posterior ;-) The only thing left for me now is to figure out how the hey rc logging perform logging while root is still ro. I currently have suppressed the red asterisks by remounting root rw in /sbin/linuxrc, but am thinking of reverting that because fsck won't work. Yes, the fsck can be performed inside /sbin/linuxrc, but I rather not do that to keep /sbin/linuxrc simple. Am going to parse the initscripts later today to figure things out. Rgds, --0015175ddaac135fb604b310fa23 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Dec 2, 2011 2:50 AM, "Walter Dnes" <waltdnes@waltdnes.org> wrote:
>
> =C2=A0Corrected "#!/sbin/busybox ash" to "#!/bin/busybo= x ash" in step 3. =C2=A0The
> weird part is that my system actually booted and ran fine even with th= is
> typo in the script.
>

Amazingly enough, my system also works. Albeit with two red asterisks du= ring boot. But the errors only affected rc logging, so I didn't pursue = the issue further. Then again, I don't need to do smarty exotic things = in /sbin/linuxrc, so the kernel's default actions of automagically moun= ting /proc and /sys saved my posterior ;-)

The only thing left for me now is to figure out how the hey rc logging p= erform logging while root is still ro. I currently have suppressed the red = asterisks by remounting root rw in /sbin/linuxrc, but am thinking of revert= ing that because fsck won't work. Yes, the fsck can be performed inside= /sbin/linuxrc, but I rather not do that to keep /sbin/linuxrc simple.

Am going to parse the initscripts later today to figure things out.

Rgds,

--0015175ddaac135fb604b310fa23--