From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RCfZs-0007eo-8s for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2011 22:41:08 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 52D6021C270; Sat, 8 Oct 2011 22:40:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from svr-us4.tirtonadi.com (svr-us4.tirtonadi.com [69.65.43.212]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B80D021C19E for ; Sat, 8 Oct 2011 22:40:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bw0-f53.google.com ([209.85.214.53]) by svr-us4.tirtonadi.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RCfYp-002MdO-OW for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 09 Oct 2011 05:40:03 +0700 Received: by bkbzt12 with SMTP id zt12so8504645bkb.40 for ; Sat, 08 Oct 2011 15:40:00 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.75.137 with SMTP id y9mr20911979faj.14.1318113600566; Sat, 08 Oct 2011 15:40:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.74.130 with HTTP; Sat, 8 Oct 2011 15:40:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.74.130 with HTTP; Sat, 8 Oct 2011 15:40:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5838278.GcrzxLVC68@pc> References: <84E18622-417F-4241-9F68-1B9E07967D03@stellar.eclipse.co.uk> <5838278.GcrzxLVC68@pc> Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2011 05:40:00 +0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Anyone else using vimpager? From: Pandu Poluan To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015174c3cd6ef762704aed13c85 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - svr-us4.tirtonadi.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - lists.gentoo.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - poluan.info X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: f236facc297fcf6d924b4af0bec70a47 --0015174c3cd6ef762704aed13c85 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Oct 9, 2011 6:27 AM, "Michael Schreckenbauer" wrote: > > On Sunday, 9. October 2011 05:01:25 Pandu Poluan wrote: > > On Oct 9, 2011 5:05 AM, "Stroller" wrote: > > > On 8 October 2011, at 10:19, Pandu Poluan wrote: > > > > I'm just wondering if there's anyone else -- beside me -- that uses > > > > vimpager > > > > > > for PAGER? > > > > > > Tried it, couldn't get along with it at all. I can't now recall why. > > > > > > Why do you ask? > > > > Well, there's no ebuild for vimpager in portage, and if there are other > > users, I might be interested in writing one. > > vim has a use flag vim-pager that installs vimpager. At least that's what euse > -i tells me :) > It has?!?! Gee, I've been looking in the wrong place, then :-( Rgds, --0015174c3cd6ef762704aed13c85 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8


On Oct 9, 2011 6:27 AM, "Michael Schreckenbauer" <grimlog@gmx.de> wrote:
>
> On Sunday, 9. October 2011 05:01:25 Pandu Poluan wrote:
> > On Oct 9, 2011 5:05 AM, "Stroller" <stroller@stellar.eclipse.co.uk> wrote:
> > > On 8 October 2011, at 10:19, Pandu Poluan wrote:
> > > > I'm just wondering if there's anyone else -- beside me -- that uses
> >
> > vimpager
> >
> > > > for PAGER?
> > >
> > > Tried it, couldn't get along with it at all. I can't now recall why.
> > >
> > > Why do you ask?
> >
> > Well, there's no ebuild for vimpager in portage, and if there are other
> > users, I might be interested in writing one.
>
> vim has a use flag vim-pager that installs vimpager. At least that's what euse
> -i tells me :)
>

It has?!?!

Gee, I've been looking in the wrong place, then :-(

Rgds,

--0015174c3cd6ef762704aed13c85--