From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-150717-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 579431381F3
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 07:37:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B54D8E0B24;
Tue, 17 Sep 2013 07:37:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from svr-us4.tirtonadi.com (svr-us4.tirtonadi.com [69.65.43.212])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A613E0B09
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 07:37:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-vb0-f52.google.com ([209.85.212.52]:48906)
by svr-us4.tirtonadi.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.80.1)
(envelope-from <pandu@poluan.info>)
id 1VLpqp-003P2u-UL
for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 14:37:35 +0700
Received: by mail-vb0-f52.google.com with SMTP id f12so3774594vbg.11
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 00:37:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=ZLa3f3M16AzZ4LUxQpKmmuza04mXMsLGQasi8sDw77E=;
b=EAP7DiroTK4fMal15GSHbOAMEOTM6IlTZsSnnCj+RXyqT6KK59o0+PwiiJVMXOl+MI
m9QbMZu/ZX3MtNgx0yU053166zroiTrUrSPjKGQr3kGLvHJ+RBEs3d3qZhnUCHFyeBFb
j+phnTXmYxagFu3nACIAxb6P/arg9NSmOluDKo12bymPEtYHovATYD/RCI52Fp0URB4y
VspBBmVGs2tvdoWXDENy6mCadOkP/tzn5ld7UzsYb690ZC77AvBVdxJMdc+jHtwR/y/N
d+lvHdHZ5HiHpfox17GblFPPT1LSEjO5PX4RZ2bOVzXJN3JfVIG+fjfEKb+mcQ7p6nC9
CDTA==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.221.56.194 with SMTP id wd2mr31703342vcb.7.1379403454529;
Tue, 17 Sep 2013 00:37:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.163.69 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 00:37:34 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAN0CFw14k+ZWdpZ6oU4p6E5fS+Zt6Up=-6-vf=xOUzRULHkawA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAN0CFw0dkS=vCSXTPWyXDKOi=RVzKGEqXo56YiupvejfvJc1yQ@mail.gmail.com>
<523445F3.2040200@libertytrek.org>
<CAN0CFw14k+ZWdpZ6oU4p6E5fS+Zt6Up=-6-vf=xOUzRULHkawA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 14:37:34 +0700
Message-ID: <CAA2qdGUnDWRgox9GhGgoUJ5_p=LMMbsvngUGw0diECf2B-CQ9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} Need a new server
From: Pandu Poluan <pandu@poluan.info>
To: gentoo-user <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - svr-us4.tirtonadi.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - lists.gentoo.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - poluan.info
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: svr-us4.tirtonadi.com: authenticated_id: rileyer+pandu.poluan.info/only user confirmed/virtual account not confirmed
X-Archives-Salt: def6f0b5-ba43-4c2f-b31d-009638797751
X-Archives-Hash: b6584d33236d4e7063f2530caf31a2a8
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Grant <emailgrant@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Is the Gentoo Software RAID + LVM guide the best place for RAID
>>> install info if I'm not using LVM and I'll have a hardware RAID
>>> controller?
>>
>> Not ready to take the ZFS plunge? That would greatly reduce the complexi=
ty
>> of RAID+LVM, since ZFS best practice is to set your hardware raid contro=
ller
>> to JBOD mode and let ZFS take care of the RAID - and no LVM required (ZF=
S
>> has mucho better tools). That is my next big project for when I switch t=
o my
>> next new server.
>>
>> I'm just hoping I can get comfortable with a process for getting ZFS
>> compiled into the kernel that is workable/tenable for ongoing kernel upd=
ates
>> (with minimal fear of breaking things due to a complex/fragile
>> methodology)...
>
> Can't you just emerge zfs-kmod? Or maybe you're trying to do it
> without module support?
>
@tanstaafl's kernels have no module support.
Rgds,
--=20
FdS Pandu E Poluan
~ IT Optimizer ~
=E2=80=A2 LOPSA Member #15248
=E2=80=A2 Blog : http://pepoluan.tumblr.com
=E2=80=A2 Linked-In : http://id.linkedin.com/in/pepoluan