From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-132633-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1RcYNz-00045a-4E
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 08:15:51 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B3B6921C0E8;
Mon, 19 Dec 2011 08:15:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from svr-us4.tirtonadi.com (svr-us4.tirtonadi.com [69.65.43.212])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 027E921C083
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 08:14:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ww0-f53.google.com ([74.125.82.53])
by svr-us4.tirtonadi.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128)
(Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <pandu@poluan.info>)
id 1RcYMj-002C4Y-V1
for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 15:14:34 +0700
Received: by wgbds1 with SMTP id ds1so9166177wgb.10
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 00:14:29 -0800 (PST)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.227.207.206 with SMTP id fz14mr11353628wbb.7.1324282469073;
Mon, 19 Dec 2011 00:14:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.223.103.70 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 00:14:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.223.103.70 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 00:14:29 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4EEED697.4030000@gmail.com>
References: <20111217210709.GA1740@waltdnes.org>
<jcj39r$cf4$1@dough.gmane.org>
<20111218011054.GA2804@waltdnes.org>
<20111218103449.GA21102@waltdnes.org>
<jckg7m$cmn$1@dough.gmane.org>
<20111219000522.GA22397@waltdnes.org>
<4EEE82A5.2010909@gmail.com>
<CAA2qdGW4ySDCWvUr08=JZ2f96f=jZ7OHcrGEe2JjdemCwWmD0A@mail.gmail.com>
<4EEED697.4030000@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 15:14:29 +0700
Message-ID: <CAA2qdGUciwgwPuwjShdZkK2yaURwd2=YGL35K9b3pmvVV6GosQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] A tale of computing thud and blunder
From: Pandu Poluan <pandu@poluan.info>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175d094c26c37404b46d8a88
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - svr-us4.tirtonadi.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - lists.gentoo.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - poluan.info
X-Archives-Salt: 554fcfac-d9e0-4059-a941-066124bd106f
X-Archives-Hash: bb5b8e577d0dca9fcbf41618f951d40f
--0015175d094c26c37404b46d8a88
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On Dec 19, 2011 1:18 PM, "Dale" <rdalek1967@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Pandu Poluan wrote:
>>
>>
>> Kind of like what I always do when I switch from -march=nocona to
-march=native. (Usually I use -march=nocona to ensure seamless VM migration
on my XenServer-equipped boxen, but for some VMs, i.e., those requiring me
to wring out every last drop of performance, I go native.)
>>
>> That said, if you want to experience fully the "GCC Graphite"
optimizations, you'll also want to do emerge -ev ;-)
>>
>> Rgds,
>>
>
>
> Is Graphite worthwhile on a desktop system or is it better suited for
servers or both? I found this but still not sure what it is intended for:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Graphite/4.5
>
> Are there any reasons to leave this be for a while? You know, bugs or
packages that don't work with it?
>
In my experience, I've never encountered any bugs due to graphite. And I've
"graphite-ed" 4 production servers, including 2 firewalls, 1 DNS server,
and 1 mail server.
Of course, YMMV.
Rgds,
--0015175d094c26c37404b46d8a88
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<p><br>
On Dec 19, 2011 1:18 PM, "Dale" <<a href=3D"mailto:rdalek1967@=
gmail.com">rdalek1967@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> Pandu Poluan wrote:<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> Kind of like what I always do when I switch from -march=3Dnocona t=
o -march=3Dnative. (Usually I use -march=3Dnocona to ensure seamless VM mig=
ration on my XenServer-equipped boxen, but for some VMs, i.e., those requir=
ing me to wring out every last drop of performance, I go native.)<br>
>><br>
>> That said, if you want to experience fully the "GCC Graphite&=
quot; optimizations, you'll also want to do emerge -ev ;-)<br>
>><br>
>> Rgds,<br>
>><br>
><br>
><br>
> Is Graphite worthwhile on a desktop system or is it better suited for =
servers or both? =C2=A0I found this but still not sure what it is intended =
for:<br>
><br>
> <a href=3D"http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Graphite/4.5">http://gcc.gnu.org/wi=
ki/Graphite/4.5</a><br>
><br>
> Are there any reasons to leave this be for a while? =C2=A0You know, bu=
gs or packages that don't work with it?<br>
></p>
<p>In my experience, I've never encountered any bugs due to graphite. A=
nd I've "graphite-ed" 4 production servers, including 2 firew=
alls, 1 DNS server, and 1 mail server.</p>
<p>Of course, YMMV.</p>
<p>Rgds,<br>
</p>
--0015175d094c26c37404b46d8a88--