From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-127451-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1QyJww-0001ij-Je
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 08:45:39 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E1AFA21C1BB;
Tue, 30 Aug 2011 08:45:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from svr-us4.tirtonadi.com (unknown [69.65.43.212])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B67C821C25E
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 08:43:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-bw0-f53.google.com ([209.85.214.53])
by svr-us4.tirtonadi.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <pandu@poluan.info>)
id 1QyJv1-001XYt-3i
for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 15:43:39 +0700
Received: by bkd1 with SMTP id 1so7022692bkd.40
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 01:43:33 -0700 (PDT)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.13.137 with SMTP id c9mr4611957faa.140.1314693813603; Tue,
30 Aug 2011 01:43:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.223.79.10 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 01:43:33 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20110830085630.18aaed0d@zaphod.digimed.co.uk>
References: <20110830022716.GC6313@solfire>
<CAA2qdGWDzbuWx5C_i1G8ZKH0q4c1_bsbJjJNYkgkxucs_6=7hg@mail.gmail.com>
<20110830032927.GF6313@solfire>
<CAA2qdGWhgmQpf3bOd4h82WUqGYpO11YVf7J1eXViopKU6sMLnA@mail.gmail.com>
<20110830085630.18aaed0d@zaphod.digimed.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 15:43:33 +0700
Message-ID: <CAA2qdGUF9Vg8G4nLSdm-qrxZfRNbY8zfomHfF0if=BesJRCMWQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Important package blocked by another important package
From: Pandu Poluan <pandu@poluan.info>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - svr-us4.tirtonadi.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - lists.gentoo.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - poluan.info
X-Archives-Salt:
X-Archives-Hash: 247fc9d6c957d2f66c9ce23816e26ae9
That's right. Not unknown, but incorrect.
Sorry for not writing that, I just kind of forgot.
(Been forgetful about many things, lately.)
Rgds,
On 2011-08-30, Neil Bothwick <neil@digimed.co.uk> wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 14:15:07 +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote:
>
>> It is not that unknown -- in the Gentoo world -- for a stable package
>> to pull in an unstable package, because packages don't get stabilized
>> at the same time.
>
> It is not unknown, but it is wrong. Stable packages should never pull in
> testing packages and a bug report should be filed.
>
>
> --
> Neil Bothwick
>
> Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.
>
--
--
Pandu E Poluan - IT Optimizer
My website: http://pandu.poluan.info/