From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QyJww-0001ij-Je for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 08:45:39 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E1AFA21C1BB; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 08:45:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from svr-us4.tirtonadi.com (unknown [69.65.43.212]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B67C821C25E for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 08:43:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bw0-f53.google.com ([209.85.214.53]) by svr-us4.tirtonadi.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QyJv1-001XYt-3i for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 15:43:39 +0700 Received: by bkd1 with SMTP id 1so7022692bkd.40 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 01:43:33 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.13.137 with SMTP id c9mr4611957faa.140.1314693813603; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 01:43:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.79.10 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 01:43:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110830085630.18aaed0d@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> References: <20110830022716.GC6313@solfire> <20110830032927.GF6313@solfire> <20110830085630.18aaed0d@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 15:43:33 +0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Important package blocked by another important package From: Pandu Poluan To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - svr-us4.tirtonadi.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - lists.gentoo.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - poluan.info X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 247fc9d6c957d2f66c9ce23816e26ae9 That's right. Not unknown, but incorrect. Sorry for not writing that, I just kind of forgot. (Been forgetful about many things, lately.) Rgds, On 2011-08-30, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 14:15:07 +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote: > >> It is not that unknown -- in the Gentoo world -- for a stable package >> to pull in an unstable package, because packages don't get stabilized >> at the same time. > > It is not unknown, but it is wrong. Stable packages should never pull in > testing packages and a bug report should be filed. > > > -- > Neil Bothwick > > Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about. > -- -- Pandu E Poluan - IT Optimizer My website: http://pandu.poluan.info/