* [gentoo-user] "net-firewall/xtables-addons" issues
@ 2012-03-02 10:23 Pandu Poluan
2012-03-02 10:38 ` [gentoo-user] " Pandu Poluan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Pandu Poluan @ 2012-03-02 10:23 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
Okay, after compiling hardened-sources-3.2.2-r1, I follow through with
remerging net-firewall/xtables-addons-1.39 ...
... and it failed with an error, about unknown symbol or something.
A Google search led me to this solution:
http://groups.google.com/group/linux.debian.bugs.dist/browse_thread/thread/8ef017a863038724?pli=1
Although the attached patch in that thread *seems* to be meant for
xtables-addons-1.40 (not in portage yet), I tried applying the patches
to xtables-addons-1.39 ...
... and it worked!
However, a quick glance at upstream [1] indicates that upstream is
already at version 1.41!!
So...
1. Should I file a bugreport for xtables-addons-1.39?
2. Or should I request for xtables-addons-1.41 in the portage tree?
[1] http://sourceforge.net/projects/xtables-addons/files/Xtables-addons/
Rgds,
--
FdS Pandu E Poluan
~ IT Optimizer ~
• LOPSA Member #15248
• Blog : http://pepoluan.tumblr.com
• Linked-In : http://id.linkedin.com/in/pepoluan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-user] Re: "net-firewall/xtables-addons" issues
2012-03-02 10:23 [gentoo-user] "net-firewall/xtables-addons" issues Pandu Poluan
@ 2012-03-02 10:38 ` Pandu Poluan
2012-03-02 10:42 ` Pandu Poluan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Pandu Poluan @ 2012-03-02 10:38 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
Silly me...
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 17:23, Pandu Poluan <pandu@poluan.info> wrote:
>
> 1. Should I file a bugreport for xtables-addons-1.39?
>
> 2. Or should I request for xtables-addons-1.41 in the portage tree?
>
>
> [1] http://sourceforge.net/projects/xtables-addons/files/Xtables-addons/
>
>
Upstream's 1.41 already incorporated the necessary fixes for
xtables-addons to be compilable on kernel 3.2/3.3:
http://xtables-addons.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=xtables-addons/xtables-addons;a=commitdiff;h=076610e3af86b4b3f87f9c7811d36e38ec8a39cd
So there's just one question: Why haven't the package maintainer pull
xtables-addons-1.41 into the portage tree?
Rgds
--
FdS Pandu E Poluan
~ IT Optimizer ~
• LOPSA Member #15248
• Blog : http://pepoluan.tumblr.com
• Linked-In : http://id.linkedin.com/in/pepoluan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-user] Re: "net-firewall/xtables-addons" issues
2012-03-02 10:38 ` [gentoo-user] " Pandu Poluan
@ 2012-03-02 10:42 ` Pandu Poluan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Pandu Poluan @ 2012-03-02 10:42 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 17:38, Pandu Poluan <pandu@poluan.info> wrote:
> Silly me...
>
> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 17:23, Pandu Poluan <pandu@poluan.info> wrote:
>>
>> 1. Should I file a bugreport for xtables-addons-1.39?
>>
>> 2. Or should I request for xtables-addons-1.41 in the portage tree?
>>
>>
>> [1] http://sourceforge.net/projects/xtables-addons/files/Xtables-addons/
>>
>>
>
> Upstream's 1.41 already incorporated the necessary fixes for
> xtables-addons to be compilable on kernel 3.2/3.3:
>
> http://xtables-addons.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=xtables-addons/xtables-addons;a=commitdiff;h=076610e3af86b4b3f87f9c7811d36e38ec8a39cd
>
> So there's just one question: Why haven't the package maintainer pull
> xtables-addons-1.41 into the portage tree?
>
Bugs #397749, #403749, and #405197, apparently.
Rgds,
--
FdS Pandu E Poluan
~ IT Optimizer ~
• LOPSA Member #15248
• Blog : http://pepoluan.tumblr.com
• Linked-In : http://id.linkedin.com/in/pepoluan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-03-02 10:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-03-02 10:23 [gentoo-user] "net-firewall/xtables-addons" issues Pandu Poluan
2012-03-02 10:38 ` [gentoo-user] " Pandu Poluan
2012-03-02 10:42 ` Pandu Poluan
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox