From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-164251-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABF26138CCE
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sat, 16 May 2015 15:57:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E3BEBE08AE;
	Sat, 16 May 2015 15:57:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wg0-f46.google.com (mail-wg0-f46.google.com [74.125.82.46])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA99DE089C
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 16 May 2015 15:57:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wguv19 with SMTP id v19so83304530wgu.1
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 16 May 2015 08:57:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=QpPeW83z/tZjNMAvl01RVcEKP8pZSb0c4l8UJe4fSpg=;
        b=iktSzI+VIux+f4925I16IzOcF0Vjem0SMuZTRJd8oDRd92gjYygLdPxu4csEY+/jcV
         tdS0cCtyM8zCUJHXAh/JtLnwDOiCa46G0K3RFMfHLIxsKe9ddMp1mSiLu7R3PwJb8byk
         7kEA/vR7KtiJuerd/JLtSbL7ikUA1lxt3AajNXJVmNxRt0UzhqMI55Gs0Tw4lsGMrnf7
         GfYe+ZwKfX1hv/VCL/gSORzcm61HAtsE14Fwecq0bZtuz5JVlP6x1IxZJNEXV//94fKC
         VlD8i0qIxx5SsRXbb28ccM7TyeCb71GN1xN+3YSnkf3yUSbZlq6P+WPhF8FdEi40o9rW
         ixOA==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.92.198 with SMTP id co6mr7015690wib.34.1431791820516;
 Sat, 16 May 2015 08:57:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.27.178.16 with HTTP; Sat, 16 May 2015 08:57:00 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAGfcS_=nGmPs0eHfc1DRQy91jSQiZJAkhbOCWNeOpsgTegD4Fg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+t6X7fiKHXxwo07-gvDO5w6mMqf=EvScZod_fdM=ptLLk09Aw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJoOjx-NOeeNBVHfBNZwAfgsZtixzTcwVRE=fHa4peO3ZKJ1aw@mail.gmail.com>
	<55558dda.42dfc20a.6ffb.3e3d@mx.google.com>
	<CAJ1xhMWhkZ92Z4nWhHJC7WryU3NMu0hX_fQhq_9aVhOzwsGiiQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+t6X7dQaR+vp2OOLy4EZtaSvC=XNpF4D5xDevwnmrA=0bXUyg@mail.gmail.com>
	<5556E74B.9000903@gmail.com>
	<CA+t6X7fTrmeo8=dTwmmiQfjOsdJG4-Hjx7z0KJ449j8+asQmmg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+t6X7cppAmvy1uXwiO+LU1xx4xO6TQXziF5GP8_ax5UkXmTwA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+t6X7fxcAW98Pn4wMEJi52SVF-n5os+uF_Vsd=r0RHhM4XErA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGfcS_=nGmPs0eHfc1DRQy91jSQiZJAkhbOCWNeOpsgTegD4Fg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 16 May 2015 18:57:00 +0300
Message-ID: <CA+t6X7ezgQJnavry3Phgpibb-ZwxSce8aWdpHoOsvAkCTZWjuA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] libav and ffmpeg on the same computer issue once again
From: gevisz <gevisz@gmail.com>
To: "gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org" <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: 9c8a70b0-a225-47eb-89c3-0ec6498a4ad4
X-Archives-Hash: 31d1bbc6cdcf662f8009f66a1bfc9c8c

2015-05-16 17:12 GMT+03:00 Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org>:
> On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 8:53 AM, gevisz <gevisz@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I am inattentive today. :(
>>
>> Some blockers remained but I hope it will not broke the system.
>>...
>> [blocks b      ] <dev-qt/assistant-4.8.6:4
>> ("<dev-qt/assistant-4.8.6:4" is blocking dev-qt/qtchooser-0_p20150102)
>>...
>> Would you like to merge these packages? [Yes/No] y
>>
>
> This is pretty normal for a qt upgrade.  You haven't updated this
> system recently, so you have a couple of relatively large updates that
> are all getting mashed together in your emerge output - they're easier
> to follow individually.

My last update was on only a week ago, on May 9.

I think that the "large updates" are caused by switching to global abi_x86_32
from doing it on per package base.

> Blockers with a lower-case b are ones that portage can handle on its
> own.  Blockers with a capital B are ones it needs help from you with.
> A clue is the fact that portage went ahead with asking you whether to
> proceed, which indicates that it thinks it knows what it is doing.
> You should be fine answering Y.

Ok, thank you for explanation.

P.S. I am still compiling.