From: gevisz <gevisz@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Upgrading gcc from 6.4 to 7.3
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 15:49:43 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+t6X7e=VAGS0OAABHpduFpGDCrEhiMpUznogz-Ggpu6XBp8FA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+t6X7fsXFW7+-CXZGYP1_-Pr7gVAc0H75UC7zxODKDbvMmzUA@mail.gmail.com>
2018-06-20 15:01 GMT+03:00 gevisz <gevisz@gmail.com>:
> 2018-06-20 14:16 GMT+03:00 Mick <michaelkintzios@gmail.com>:
>> On Wednesday, 20 June 2018 11:43:32 BST gevisz wrote:
>>> After updating portage tree today, portage
>>> suggested to upgrade gcc from 6.4 to 7.3
>>> version what I have done just now.
>>>
>>> Nevertheless,
>>> # gcc-config --list-profiles
>>> [1] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-6.4.0 *
>>> [2] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-7.3.0
>>> shows that I still have version 6.4 as a default.
>>
>> I'm on gcc-7.3.0-r3 and have not noticed any problems on 3 boxen so far.
>>
>>
>>> As https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Upgrading_GCC
>>> still do not have any specific instructions on
>>> switching to gcc version 7.3, I am still afread
>>> of switching to gcc version 7.3 and would like
>>> to ask if anybody encountered some problem
>>> after switching to gcc version 7.3 and which
>>> packages should be rebuild after such switching.
>>>
>>> Thank you in advance for your help.
>>
>> I didn't have to rebuild anything, but if you have reasons to fear breakage
>> you can rebuild your toolchain:
>>
>> 1. Use gcc-config to select x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-7.3.0
>> 2. Re-source /etc/profile by running in your current console/terminal:
>> . /etc/profile
>> 3. Re-emerge libtool:
>> emerge -1 sys-devel/libtool
>> 4. Re-emerge the following packages in this order:
>> emerge -1 sys-devel/gcc-7.3.0-r3
>> emerge -1 sys-devel/binutils
>> emerge -1 sys-libs/glibc
>> 5. You could if you want re-emerge your entire system, 'emerge -e @world' or
>> if you would rather conserve electricity wait as different packages come up
>> for an update over time.
>>
>> If my experience to date holds true and for a general purpose desktop none of
>> the above rebuilds are necessary, other than switching your gcc to 7.3.0.
>
> Thank you for your reply. I do not want to rebuild gcc-7.3 for the second time
> today (as far as the temperature in my room is already +30°C). So, I will stick
> to your last advice: I will just switch the default gcc version to 7.3
> and wait for problems to appear. :)
Just have rebuilt libtool and llvm, to have less problems. :)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-20 12:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-20 10:43 [gentoo-user] Upgrading gcc from 6.4 to 7.3 gevisz
2018-06-20 11:16 ` Mick
2018-06-20 12:01 ` gevisz
2018-06-20 12:49 ` gevisz [this message]
2018-07-10 12:09 ` gevisz
2018-07-24 19:00 ` gevisz
2018-07-24 19:02 ` gevisz
2018-08-02 11:55 ` Thomas
2018-06-21 21:16 ` Andreas K. Huettel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CA+t6X7e=VAGS0OAABHpduFpGDCrEhiMpUznogz-Ggpu6XBp8FA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=gevisz@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox