From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-132268-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1RZ1Ag-0001jj-BQ
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2011 14:11:31 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 915FC21C16E;
Fri, 9 Dec 2011 14:11:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-iy0-f181.google.com (mail-iy0-f181.google.com [209.85.210.181])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92EA921C17B
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 9 Dec 2011 14:09:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by iaoo28 with SMTP id o28so4316204iao.40
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 09 Dec 2011 06:09:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:content-type;
bh=dUciyZDf4/35++3LMiOdMDF1aPASLPOktG8flQlLceE=;
b=DP/GCOT7dYt8qf7IeDvUO48rIVAw8AHbthBz3PLX7QjnL4C6uqbBVzRWyp+mMwTBea
B+E4ebemXs9IZbRX8W42zhjB8DYTAslA/B4KTjtQJ1auo6wBWsV6Yc8X/IUPKpfs0tk0
UU+PqnwuVKlae4f9fVbJ5hGakd7qln5+Tpm8E=
Received: by 10.50.76.131 with SMTP id k3mr3575531igw.22.1323439792980; Fri,
09 Dec 2011 06:09:52 -0800 (PST)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.43.45.9 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Dec 2011 06:09:31 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAJTyqKMczcenzzgkOeuaiF43FZ2H-vgJ8b4jP5n38LGX0KoCoQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAA2qdGWoqh9zZoHE_sP_oXoWGEGfE0Gpo87z5gyjff0kwjfQVQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAJTyqKMczcenzzgkOeuaiF43FZ2H-vgJ8b4jP5n38LGX0KoCoQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: James Broadhead <jamesbroadhead@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 14:09:31 +0000
Message-ID: <CA+hid6EZAiBVE72RWfVAxbEAjt-jx0nzfyNWjXSnHm+=v-XVVA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Lynx, Links, or Elinks?
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: 4e2c5efc-f05a-45de-92f9-82441761c1ee
X-Archives-Hash: ef5191b2200058f6ea37dba6bcf8c8dd
On 9 December 2011 12:44, Mariusz Ceier <mceier@gmail.com> wrote:
> w3m,links and elinks. w3m and links as they support displaying images
> under framebuffer, and elinks for it's javascript support.
> If you don't need these features, any text browser is good for
> browsing html documentation :)
Not too long ago, I was using elinks for the same reason, but found
that sites were complaining about the amount of js support, telling me
to upgrade :-(
Afterthought: it was actually the Oracle website where I was going to
get the jdk / documentation, which has gone back to being
fetch-restricted :-( :-( :-(