From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RV3Ey-00072E-4M for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 15:35:32 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9616821C13B; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 15:35:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-fx0-f53.google.com (mail-fx0-f53.google.com [209.85.161.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB46621C104 for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 15:33:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by faaq2 with SMTP id q2so1732273faa.40 for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 07:33:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=D+BslTHucsATRC0GR1w4ljc6exRgo/uRA5T6qJWBB2I=; b=fH2FsoDDj2aOnE26ODMbPNduiP/k2wMKJEuWsVMZ+WpYtLbf0LhFaIqLq7u1M+IzTe DqNwjxwYyjpOcVC2FldtAknRKbF7HBwnH1xwtCIAdbVuv5jXsHtzrhbqWTbLqX0gTyS3 yn1juZNXBFvarKfdHhiLM8eQEvCuoqLUhVYno= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.128.208 with SMTP id l16mr26956943bks.14.1322494411869; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 07:33:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.14.7 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 07:33:31 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 10:33:31 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Devs and rice flags (Was: Re: [gentoo-user] emerge -j, make -j and make -l ) From: Michael Mol To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: 2ec01357-f549-4551-b6bc-2360900889fc X-Archives-Hash: c75f45003f1f2b83e2e50861401e68e8 On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Pandu Poluan wrote: > Won't file a bug report, though. I have a feeling that my bug report re: > emerge failure will be marked WONTFIX thanks to the 'ricer special' CFLAGS The CFLAGS you showed me weren't any more ricer than "-O2 -march=native". (I didn't know that -D_FORTIFY=2 came from gcc) They wouldn't have a leg to stand on... -- :wq