From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-140809-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F8CE138010
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 19:34:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 69C41E072D;
	Thu, 23 Aug 2012 19:34:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f53.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f53.google.com [209.85.215.53])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7835CE07F8
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 19:30:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by lahc1 with SMTP id c1so680774lah.40
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 12:30:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=vZP71HiGM/5ML5Oq0WvCSAJr3nDdSp1TLV81R1fcaAc=;
        b=f7i5TxcGowNDNCRWv0wyywKgGRklOGl3OcrAi4R+ZLL01TYFOlUHu68PwTG1vILYZj
         CWv3/+cisPchw0JpZhXXe1u+u8zeMpZfo0EmDXiRLLOI4z08uBvuGbhEu47UTV/H9fkp
         uOr8zjj2ydC/G+vs573zaWmPScNLMGZCpAUoojdCaVd6ruUjbxyAYQFU/J+0YUSIq6Bz
         wmiffwcD1AnSC44r0a2eWzCrcI376cTh//kuUMfam98+RSpZgDKPfnOncSVU+/5pUNGy
         3jVYv2ezPJqqkkIwaLrDisLcWXRi7CL7Wnawj5XbFtGNgsYKc2O/G8KDP5sig9gQt5cO
         LH5Q==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.112.26.99 with SMTP id k3mr779433lbg.9.1345750250286; Thu, 23
 Aug 2012 12:30:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.41.197 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 12:30:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20120823202245.4678e3c1@hactar.digimed.co.uk>
References: <CAK2H+ed-_Y4=e1ZAtG4_LF=SD=1DAyAXKuTHQn8wCYnSKDg4gQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEH5T2N-FH91VN2U0_SCZ4EXAu4Vb8w8jPru9nLOYnsHw58DyA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAK2H+ed4r1rtEO0_YAtN8OTT0H+VkF=jHbRWdQuD_otKKVVxzg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAK2H+eeiT_L9Z=pnmuV_Q-tvzb8VVb9EsXiSxZp7Px5T5wayJA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120823202245.4678e3c1@hactar.digimed.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 15:30:49 -0400
Message-ID: <CA+czFiDeBUrD-t9-O1qSenyoQWL6jQa7kuWkSG6vP=cegW35LQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] SSD performance tweaking
From: Michael Mol <mikemol@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: 7146e367-5230-4256-b8ce-a18d9f420b38
X-Archives-Hash: 1dffa093af6c8f448908f50972742420

On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Neil Bothwick <neil@digimed.co.uk> wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 11:57:25 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
>
>> This limitation is likely just a byproduct of using a 1 lane
>> controller. If one was willing to spend a (fairly large) bit more one
>> could get a 16 lane SATA3 controller and would likely do much better
>> in terms of throughput...
>
> If you want real performance from SSD, you ditch SATA altogether and use
> a drive on a dedicated card. Of course, you're talking real money now.

Um. I'm pretty sure he's already getting 'real' performance from that
SSD, even a "mere" 200MB/s runs circles around my best set of platters
at home.

-- 
:wq