From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-144908-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B60601387A3
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 18:29:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1F00B21C03E;
Thu, 31 Jan 2013 18:29:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ob0-f178.google.com (mail-ob0-f178.google.com [209.85.214.178])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99D2CE0639
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 18:29:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ob0-f178.google.com with SMTP id wd20so3200117obb.37
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 10:29:06 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=o1UmkA/bX/zIpc3MOYnGJpoX5M0Chs09GZ/RVlOv3Bs=;
b=anOAivUqXJrYvKinnTZbSlSXyaPcY8PeyPZJVBvcmzRheBb7+WKb6FwAQZ2QXCI5kP
WhhYdY1gkP7JWeXHThm9xSudwdAtSXhgodfjBEAw1VOim+Hv7b07B6qZiGnGoiR2PkHR
tBO0VAT4diYO9vir7Q4QoW+G9xVygIbigAGcOshKQCN5Jexz6EwcOWZ++wwFUTzr4OkS
e8d2oSki5pIYOnCWrxu5zO2Au2hhiuq1AqYQTOqtuWyVVD6bQUj80chaKS6ZV3eaFeXw
ydqN8p6msYKlM69jOEH0lmEQFGEg45tGjNa77/g34xZOJCRfKiNP33Qd+DK47dM1hzSh
o36w==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.30.201 with SMTP id u9mr7534789oeh.28.1359656946802; Thu,
31 Jan 2013 10:29:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.76.20.243 with HTTP; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 10:29:06 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <201301311824.29755.michaelkintzios@gmail.com>
References: <CA+czFiD0PYZ7tDr_zbq0gYeLPPp-MrTsjL4ahJL0yCr1h1bYfg@mail.gmail.com>
<201301311430.06572.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org>
<CA+czFiD=H8fmwBV-vhEuXZJbH_cKAvDP+6w=BUgZKFa2vG6itA@mail.gmail.com>
<201301311824.29755.michaelkintzios@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 13:29:06 -0500
Message-ID: <CA+czFiDdWHya4D6WPgUXH8zTKm5C3EYi78mHdzUHvq_3p-FNsQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] udev-191 bit me. Insufficient ptys
From: Michael Mol <mikemol@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: d14f98fe-a541-4a2e-b7f2-e554a140e944
X-Archives-Hash: 2e4503f29a5dbc3f29188414224c450a
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Mick <michaelkintzios@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thursday 31 Jan 2013 14:37:00 Michael Mol wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Peter Humphrey
>>
>> <peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org> wrote:
>> > On Thursday 31 January 2013 14:05:07 Michael Mol wrote:
>> >> OK, it looks like /dev/pts is not mounted. But darned if I know
>> >> why...Isn't udev supposed to handle that?
>> >
>> > Why did you remove udev-mount from the sysinit level? I left mine alone
>> > and it all works just fine.
>>
>> Because, when I initially rebooted, openrc failed to launch the
>> udev-mount service, and I couldn't get any farther in the boot
>> sequence until I removed it. (Which involved removing the symlink in
>> /etc/runlevels, since rc-update kept failing while complaining about
>> being unable to update dependencies.)
>>
>> It seems possible now that the reason the udev-mount service failed to
>> start was because of the missing CONFIG_DEVTMPFS kernel config option.
>> I can try adding udev-mount back to see if it works.
>
> Well, I have udev-mount running:
>
> rc-update -s -v | grep udev
> udev | sysinit
> udev-mount | sysinit
>
> and do not have CONFIG_DEVTMPFS_MOUNT enabled. devpts is created fine and I
> have no problems booting:
>
> mount | grep devpts
> devpts on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,nosuid,noexec,relatime,gid=5,mode=620)
>
>
> You may want to try the same in case it works?
I probably will re-add udev-mount. It's certainly plausible it only
failed because of the lack of CONFIG_DEVTMPFS, and having
CONFIG_DEVTMPFS_MOUNT enabled fixed basic pty and shm functionality
for me.
It's also worth noting that whether or not you use an initramfs (I
don't on this machine) can make a difference.
--
:wq