public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Mol <mikemol@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] LibreOffice 3.4.4: required HDD space
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 09:07:33 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+czFiDKj3WGGcTpS60+uaom+tAuxSr8JwMwKOEL4DBEzRAusw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111120110905.1c443c4a.v_2e@ukr.net>

On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 4:09 AM,  <v_2e@ukr.net> wrote:
>  Hello!
>  I decided to upgrade LibreOffice this week to the verstion 3.4.4.
>  Before trying to build this package, emerge performed the pre-check
> of available space on my hard disk - 9GB. I did have this amount of
> free space on the drive, but I noticed that after about 8 hours of
> compiling it took only ~4 GB on my HDD. First of all, I thought that it
> was compiling *really* slowly and that it hadn't even made a half of
> the job. However, after about a half an hour it finished with success
> and I noticed that altogether it took about 4.5 GB on HDD.
>  So it checked 9GB (and earlier versions of LO indeed needed almost
> such amount of free space), but took only as much as 4.5 GB.
>
>  The question is: why?

I'll venture a guess that it may have approached 9GB either with some
short-lived files, or *would* have approached 9GB with a different USE
flag or other configuration combination.

> P.S. Today I tried to install LO v.3.4.4 on the machine with about 6 GB
> of free space. Emerge performed its regular pre-check and refused to
> build the package. I changed the
>    CHECKREQS_DISK_BUILD="9G"
> to
>    CHECKREQS_DISK_BUILD="5G"
> in "libreoffice-3.4.4.2-r1.ebuild" and everything went fine.

Ok, then I'll narrow my guess to the size required being dependent on
USE flag combinations.

-- 
:wq



  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-11-20 14:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-11-20  9:09 [gentoo-user] LibreOffice 3.4.4: required HDD space v_2e
2011-11-20 11:12 ` Philip Webb
2011-11-20 11:52 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2011-11-20 14:43   ` smalker
2011-11-20 14:07 ` Michael Mol [this message]
2011-11-20 18:32   ` Neil Bothwick
2011-11-20 18:58     ` James Broadhead
2011-11-20 19:07       ` Michael Mol
2011-11-20 19:30       ` Dale
2011-11-20 20:09       ` Alan McKinnon
2011-11-26 13:49         ` James Broadhead
2011-11-26 14:10           ` Alan McKinnon
2011-11-27  1:06             ` Dale
2011-11-27 16:07         ` [gentoo-user] " Grant Edwards
2011-11-20 19:07   ` [gentoo-user] " v_2e
2011-11-20 19:18     ` Michael Mol

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CA+czFiDKj3WGGcTpS60+uaom+tAuxSr8JwMwKOEL4DBEzRAusw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=mikemol@gmail.com \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox