From: Michael Mol <mikemol@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] LibreOffice 3.4.4: required HDD space
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 09:07:33 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+czFiDKj3WGGcTpS60+uaom+tAuxSr8JwMwKOEL4DBEzRAusw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111120110905.1c443c4a.v_2e@ukr.net>
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 4:09 AM, <v_2e@ukr.net> wrote:
> Hello!
> I decided to upgrade LibreOffice this week to the verstion 3.4.4.
> Before trying to build this package, emerge performed the pre-check
> of available space on my hard disk - 9GB. I did have this amount of
> free space on the drive, but I noticed that after about 8 hours of
> compiling it took only ~4 GB on my HDD. First of all, I thought that it
> was compiling *really* slowly and that it hadn't even made a half of
> the job. However, after about a half an hour it finished with success
> and I noticed that altogether it took about 4.5 GB on HDD.
> So it checked 9GB (and earlier versions of LO indeed needed almost
> such amount of free space), but took only as much as 4.5 GB.
>
> The question is: why?
I'll venture a guess that it may have approached 9GB either with some
short-lived files, or *would* have approached 9GB with a different USE
flag or other configuration combination.
> P.S. Today I tried to install LO v.3.4.4 on the machine with about 6 GB
> of free space. Emerge performed its regular pre-check and refused to
> build the package. I changed the
> CHECKREQS_DISK_BUILD="9G"
> to
> CHECKREQS_DISK_BUILD="5G"
> in "libreoffice-3.4.4.2-r1.ebuild" and everything went fine.
Ok, then I'll narrow my guess to the size required being dependent on
USE flag combinations.
--
:wq
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-20 14:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-20 9:09 [gentoo-user] LibreOffice 3.4.4: required HDD space v_2e
2011-11-20 11:12 ` Philip Webb
2011-11-20 11:52 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2011-11-20 14:43 ` smalker
2011-11-20 14:07 ` Michael Mol [this message]
2011-11-20 18:32 ` Neil Bothwick
2011-11-20 18:58 ` James Broadhead
2011-11-20 19:07 ` Michael Mol
2011-11-20 19:30 ` Dale
2011-11-20 20:09 ` Alan McKinnon
2011-11-26 13:49 ` James Broadhead
2011-11-26 14:10 ` Alan McKinnon
2011-11-27 1:06 ` Dale
2011-11-27 16:07 ` [gentoo-user] " Grant Edwards
2011-11-20 19:07 ` [gentoo-user] " v_2e
2011-11-20 19:18 ` Michael Mol
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CA+czFiDKj3WGGcTpS60+uaom+tAuxSr8JwMwKOEL4DBEzRAusw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=mikemol@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox