From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SiI7y-0001sJ-EG for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 04:39:18 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D1190E0384; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 04:39:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lb0-f181.google.com (mail-lb0-f181.google.com [209.85.217.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF5B2E0A88 for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 04:37:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lbbgk8 with SMTP id gk8so4628050lbb.40 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 21:37:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=CkHQoLK5pvZQf39gce2S0pwa1GMKiV1ucOZOXE90I74=; b=ZzDgfHg3RdM6odQc7Fz9Drv2x5bXYYEv/K8EFP8T3HRB61ngAr1ZVT96ytZM1+1f9+ V661rK8Ykb4X/StTxGlc4q9Gzd4TR28UJGVGNjGvgi6ZLUe6qof/UBG9SRjSImc7+HUr M6elrfnhCp/4wIdaCyzAVZjEohftvNFnxjQz56BqUeVZmbg6Nkvwgqtlv0M5IFgYes/p 2oL4r3ZmBlqk9vIyqa1qVFWcowuLTt02zl9VbikRFFIPUGb2KxE0J29xcWUlYtBRiwP+ dderj6nI4mlbf2gX0wVE/wekEi1lJCuCKtTgw8LD+K3lOtVP13M81RnQfAniKpknDK9D wCrA== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.48.169 with SMTP id m9mr2370409lbn.93.1340426259759; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 21:37:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.44.229 with HTTP; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 21:37:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20120603033410.GC12597@madrid> Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2012 00:37:39 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Just a heads-up, I think =sys-libs/glibc-2.14.1-r3 is a stinker. From: Michael Mol To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 4515f5a6-288e-4e0c-9768-dbefc44b75a7 X-Archives-Hash: 25541cf60fb15de1980c509d1c487759 On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 11:56 PM, Michael Mol wrote: > On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Dmitry Goncharov > wrote: >> On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 10:52:12PM -0400, Michael Mol wrote: >>> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Michael Mol wrote= : >>> Wow. Just wow. This is incredible. >>> >>> This is repeatable for me. >>> >> >>> =C2=A0* The problem occurred while executing the ebuild file named >>> =C2=A0* 'glibc-2.14.1-r3.ebuild' located in the '/var/db/pkg/sys- >>> >> >>> CFLAGS=3D"-O2 -pipe -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3D2 -march=3Dcore2 -mcx16 -msahf >>> --param l1-cache-size=3D32 --param l1-cache-line-size=3D64 --param >>> l2-cache-size=3D4096 -mtune=3Dcore2 -ggdb3" >>> CXXFLAGS=3D"${CFLAGS}" >> >> Can you upgrage to glibc-2.15? > > Sure. It's going to be another full reinstall. Forgot to try this. Will do tomorrow. > >> Can you tweak you gcc flags to something more conventional and see if th= e >> problem persists? > > Those CFLAGS should be equivalent to: > CFLAGS=3D"-O2 -pipe -ggdb3 --march=3Dnative". > > But I'll try making it just -O2 -pipe --march=3Dnative. Just an update: Tried CFLAGS=3D"-O2 -pipe --march=3Dnative -ggdb3". Same re= sults. > >> If you are interested in submitting a patch to the upstream then you can= build >> the glibc test suite with your gcc flags and check if the tests pass. I do still have a working gentoo laptop I could try this on...but it has an i3 proc, as opposed to the core 2 xeon or the phenom 9650. Have a link to instructions? --=20 :wq