From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B5BD138010 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 20:26:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 96615E06FE; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 20:26:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bk0-f53.google.com (mail-bk0-f53.google.com [209.85.214.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55140E0655 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 20:24:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkwj4 with SMTP id j4so940bkw.40 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 13:24:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=eVk59ADN9UC7af0FSTHC78UxZhX6zP8x51cWHEGB49s=; b=W077EHwOv1UM+Qr6KSarpZkG8sIJhmkQDLQzEkxekyoJikX6F2hTUSnGEH2RFoqJqZ ++NXWQYzwqTXOaO80gHeB0SOtmSr6Wkn7RQkejKB1YHc7BuLsIvgbEj7GpPghETw3xyY GwJ0GSKq1tNV39sPUk/+ed9JHki93LlOsIQ8OepTlgn7svDkj+3vEGWSYVZgehk6SDyI Y+gEUtY26jO6ghtF3uDJp/qmV3p8wMuAhn9AISViQde0SWoqiHJB3qeCMfwynXqStqv4 6SlpZhtuDj0+elHlU8yMi2I30G/pO3VSla3KbfFCqScp5nzQjhLxeAYCoMWZB2GYCY5l VNtw== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.136.205 with SMTP id s13mr6987957bkt.22.1345667060363; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 13:24:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.205.25.8 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 13:24:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120822211201.29856d64@hactar.digimed.co.uk> References: <20120822211201.29856d64@hactar.digimed.co.uk> Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 16:24:20 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] xz memory hungry? From: Michael Mol To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: b405db90-bfeb-4569-9032-3bfb5f65ac82 X-Archives-Hash: 343206abe7be0d3fc6c4ac8bf7f8c420 On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 15:05:38 -0400, Michael Mol wrote: > >> You could download the .tar.xz file, decompress it on a different box, >> and then recompress it with lighter settings. >> >> unxz filename.tar.xz >> xz -1 filename.tar > > You'd have to rebuild the ebuild's manifest after doing that, or portage > will download the original again. Fair point. -- :wq