From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1S0eHj-0001c7-6j for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 19:24:59 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 52484E077F; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 19:24:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bk0-f53.google.com (mail-bk0-f53.google.com [209.85.214.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 246E9E0D33 for ; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 19:23:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkcit16 with SMTP id it16so1561360bkc.40 for ; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 11:23:46 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of mikemol@gmail.com designates 10.205.121.16 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.205.121.16; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of mikemol@gmail.com designates 10.205.121.16 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=mikemol@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=mikemol@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.205.121.16]) by 10.205.121.16 with SMTP id ga16mr1302826bkc.104.1330025026316 (num_hops = 1); Thu, 23 Feb 2012 11:23:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=TYjQBKc1xmMK2Y52EN//02omiRazdRna+U3QGjqLfjY=; b=XPA+C0o7zfikz2E3SXtXk0K7jzeVkLCy9Wcon2TDZIwNL+M9RZJ5zPh5GAWGB2lDmy 6E3wvtgWUsfL6cmE15H/4+q6eK1oHjfik6OCT942EpDKgXw/eVp2Utfxx6HoBIjs+MO1 HC3RS7ZaV1c5a9CcgPftE71oPYyoNDqJtPYrY= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.205.121.16 with SMTP id ga16mr1076044bkc.104.1330025026150; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 11:23:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.14.19 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 11:23:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 14:23:46 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] gcc fails and then succeeds - definitely a problem? From: Michael Mol To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: bc76baf5-fba4-4627-97d4-addecc81b1f7 X-Archives-Hash: 6514154b7cca814fd93a48a280912f8f On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Grant wrote: > The gcc update just failed to compile on one of my systems with a > segfault, but then succeeded after trying again even though I didn't > change anything. =C2=A0Does that indicate a hardware problem for sure? > Should I run memtester? =C2=A0Any other tests to run? =C2=A0Nothing in dm= esg. Not definitively anything; it could have been a race condition. Memtest if you like. prime95 is designed for CPU and memory burning, too, and wouldn't require you to shutdown your system. --=20 :wq