From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-143710-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1A5E1381F3
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 16:04:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A939621C0D7;
Mon, 24 Dec 2012 16:04:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ob0-f181.google.com (mail-ob0-f181.google.com [209.85.214.181])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 057EAE05F8
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 16:00:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ob0-f181.google.com with SMTP id oi10so6784240obb.12
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 08:00:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type;
bh=lPRW6NeFQ4nKkKYf/HFPKfu+HDtOmujkd0ZVbQNeg5E=;
b=D7wGGbtjRCJClQ2spAJjfwqziJWdyCZ1d//iWxa+PVjzCMNsx4UuzVbNuwSXS89NAh
CyYZ9wGjecg7oHNGfSCuRacqIr76bmHGsv7SOYPWv16x5ual6jPovkJeLmHcyNOpZqTT
JgC84aGA4Z9aHm0Jy4lSPKEnGRkF3x8PulufGfpihVGm0URbGiBGb9zHh46A4lyyrbkr
5QscAAZJH9POu7Up/gWq/JtTRGGYF9v5Avxw/IZtDj7zwyJGNX4VuGv7KJwiGARBI2n1
XczWlPo4USwa+ciOrTMYD/HUrw4qy3fqNUWmNonNTbbHDZkN5mhcyzGhKyROpQphmcLI
iUfg==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.60.30.201 with SMTP id u9mr6377900oeh.28.1356364813220; Mon,
24 Dec 2012 08:00:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.76.20.243 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 08:00:13 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <87wqw74f6q.fsf@ist.utl.pt>
References: <50CB1942.3020900@gmail.com>
<CAK2H+ecMZ5JO+SGBAdwhGO0HnB8Za-6_EaS1OiQcEJ03a0iQVg@mail.gmail.com>
<50CB4A3C.1030109@gmail.com>
<CAK2H+ecBb-nJ-ZY1efRT+sNCq6v9xgWnwL4GVpY-2j-GNTpJeA@mail.gmail.com>
<50CB5406.7040404@gmail.com>
<CAK2H+efpby+2NnbjReXyGjN3=Xe63j_2K69kCZjDhZcHvjusdA@mail.gmail.com>
<8738z7hgsa.fsf@ist.utl.pt>
<20121216171043.71084070@khamul.example.com>
<CAG2nJkNDLDp2hkz34XXEen4SO1_Mm18G8NNDMZK6tqDr+ddWtA@mail.gmail.com>
<20121217104621.735bf43a@khamul.example.com>
<CA+czFiD+Yv_PXctATd6EYws8kpqb3WFesLZU47jMN5ZJmy3oww@mail.gmail.com>
<20121218163332.7956f31a@khamul.example.com>
<87txrd6pb3.fsf@ist.utl.pt>
<20121223182037.1553813f@khamul.example.com>
<87bodk7lb6.fsf@ist.utl.pt>
<20121224085528.56f535ec@khamul.example.com>
<50D85167.9060309@gmail.com>
<50D85F68.609@gmail.com>
<878v8n5w1q.fsf@ist.utl.pt>
<CA+czFiDOoLuNHGWQCVb0Tphdingu44ttM7K+dUCKN9CP9yc82Q@mail.gmail.com>
<87wqw74f6q.fsf@ist.utl.pt>
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2012 11:00:13 -0500
Message-ID: <CA+czFiC7XM-5qAB64PQwkS5cEtWcp62cZbEbPXfMqboJr7jowQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Anyone switched to eudev yet?
From: Michael Mol <mikemol@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: f0790500-a418-49a9-90ee-6122f07d988e
X-Archives-Hash: 2753dada41375b465da93f245b98ef52
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Nuno J. Silva <nunojsilva@ist.utl.pt> wrote:
> On 2012-12-24, Michael Mol wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Nuno J. Silva <nunojsilva@ist.utl.pt> wrote:
>>> On 2012-12-24, Dale wrote:
>>>
> [...]
>>>> From my understanding, if I upgrade my system to the later version of
>>>> udev and bypass the init system, my system will not boot. I have not
>>>> tested the theory but that is what people have been saying. Not only is
>>>> my /usr separate but it is on LVM partitons too.
>>>
>>> Your problem would be LVM (if that's an issue at all, as I said I don't
>>> know LVM), you'd not need udevd to mount /usr if it were a regular
>>> partition.
>>
>> "you wouldn't have this problem if you did *something else*" is a
>> terrible response. There are very good reasons to use LVM. There are
>> good (IMO, at least) reasons to avoid using an initr* on Gentoo.
>> (Those reasons are sprinkled through the thread, some spoken by me,
>> some spoken by others.)
>
> A shame that was not what I meant at all, the only thing I said was
> "yes, the problem is probably caused by it being on LVM, not because of
> /usr being separate". Just pointing the specific part of Dale's config
> that would be the problem.
Miscommunication, then. Happens. :)
--
:wq