From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SiYWu-0001gi-NU for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 22:10:09 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 980D0E0CD4; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 22:09:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bk0-f53.google.com (mail-bk0-f53.google.com [209.85.214.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C866621C0C9 for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 22:08:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkcjk13 with SMTP id jk13so2665204bkc.40 for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 15:08:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kIpnIWodwis1Hu8cqxSwe5ii/5On14zHFxfC/eqhT5Y=; b=hAOmSwFhTT7bapLXAsvoyB5+pB0Tq8NY4A2v5uMa+bgTxiJYaIQNAq475EP0GF7kX9 aSQdjBSfAmkE/VVlm7g4u8qZV3oizQ3GosK5gvN0KkJOUJfGC3HzqADjYW3NcRCceun4 kZjEPRCi3KCUD4DASre952DQ27YnfOfpdFBPmJfj7OdDolq7EfFzQyfcFFEToXhdfw7m PcK9fj5eSgNTMj39MwfvM+1FiqdciYi3pSx6B/uEvg5WBX9zpdpSRoLHc2y7ADvOQI+b fgJY75hrOJrSbOVJlykWy2x4IIHYrZ7zLgZqFO9SAxTnMH0BuwJeODd1fsIatnJcSg8P A4ig== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.151.199 with SMTP id d7mr2312498bkw.73.1340489292864; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 15:08:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.205.83.139 with HTTP; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 15:08:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20120603033410.GC12597@madrid> Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2012 18:08:12 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Just a heads-up, I think =sys-libs/glibc-2.14.1-r3 is a stinker. From: Michael Mol To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 580e0585-e8ee-43e4-817d-b7ead721627e X-Archives-Hash: 3c752d15c57163bb4e03144dbd97b578 On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 12:37 AM, Michael Mol wrote: > On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 11:56 PM, Michael Mol wrote: >> On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Dmitry Goncharov >> wrote: >>> On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 10:52:12PM -0400, Michael Mol wrote: >>>> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Michael Mol wrot= e: >>>> Wow. Just wow. This is incredible. >>>> >>>> This is repeatable for me. >>>> >>> >>>> =C2=A0* The problem occurred while executing the ebuild file named >>>> =C2=A0* 'glibc-2.14.1-r3.ebuild' located in the '/var/db/pkg/sys- >>>> >>> >>>> CFLAGS=3D"-O2 -pipe -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3D2 -march=3Dcore2 -mcx16 -msahf >>>> --param l1-cache-size=3D32 --param l1-cache-line-size=3D64 --param >>>> l2-cache-size=3D4096 -mtune=3Dcore2 -ggdb3" >>>> CXXFLAGS=3D"${CFLAGS}" >>> >>> Can you upgrage to glibc-2.15? >> >> Sure. It's going to be another full reinstall. > > Forgot to try this. Will do tomorrow. > >> >>> Can you tweak you gcc flags to something more conventional and see if t= he >>> problem persists? >> >> Those CFLAGS should be equivalent to: >> CFLAGS=3D"-O2 -pipe -ggdb3 --march=3Dnative". >> >> But I'll try making it just -O2 -pipe --march=3Dnative. > > Just an update: Tried CFLAGS=3D"-O2 -pipe --march=3Dnative -ggdb3". Same = results. > >> >>> If you are interested in submitting a patch to the upstream then you ca= n build >>> the glibc test suite with your gcc flags and check if the tests pass. > > I do still have a working gentoo laptop I could try this on...but it > has an i3 proc, as opposed to the core 2 xeon or the phenom 9650. Have > a link to instructions? For anyone following or interested, this is now reported as bug #423149. I'll be tracking progress there, so I have a common place to keep notes and discoveries as I try to work it out. https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D423149 --=20 :wq