public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Mol <mikemol@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] rng-tools
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 21:14:27 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+czFiBk8R2vRvQQUTBHvF-_VPvvCPy1zA_LyAamenQYizoUBg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F55E7A8.9040803@gentoo.org>

On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 5:32 AM, Sebastian Pipping <sping@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Hello Michael,
>
>
> On 03/03/2012 02:48 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
>> The version of the rng-tools Debian package I'm using is
>> '2-unofficial-mt.14-1~60squeeze1'. Are the -T and -R parameters unique
>> to Debian, or is the Gentoo package simply out of date?
>
> Yes, version 2-unofficial-mt.14* is a Debian fork.  Quoting from its
> README file:
>
>  rng-tools, unofficial Debian fork
>  =================================
>
>  NOTICE:
>  This is an unofficial version of rng-tools with a lot of added
>  functionality and bugs, for which I assume total blame.  Don't bother
>  rng-tools upstream with problems you find in this version of
>  rng-tools.
>
>  rng-tools unofficial-mt is a living reminder to myself to not modify
>  upstream code without sending the changes upstream at every step.
>  Suddenly, you have a mass of changes too big to send upstream, and
>  yet you find yourself without the energy to break them into smallish
>  patches to submit upstream (i.e. to "unfork").
>
>  [..]
>
> If you would rather use Debian's version in Gentoo, give
>
>  sys-apps/rng-tools-2_p14
>
> a try, which I have just added to overlay betagarden:
>
>  # layman -a betagarden
>  # emerge =sys-apps/rng-tools-2_p14
>
> If you would like to see features from Debian's fork in rng-tools 3.x
> and beyond, please step up and help rng-tools' upstream integrate
> Debian's changes.

Thanks to all who replied...I haven't pursued rng-tools on gentoo as I
got a TRNG that's plugged into one of my Gentoo systems.

Meanwhile, I've been working on a package called etools, which may be
of interest and use to people who care about their system's entropy.

https://github.com/mikemol/etools

entwatch works and is useful now.

entbuff worked before I started putting stuff in git. When I've got it
working again, and once I've written manpages for it, the etools
package will be ready for a 1.0 release.

entmesh doesn't have a single line of code written yet, but it's going
to be the jewel of the thing, intended to help solve entropy
starvation issues in servers and virtual machines in environments
where a trusted external entropy source might be found.

-- 
:wq



      reply	other threads:[~2012-04-13  1:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-03 13:48 [gentoo-user] rng-tools Michael Mol
2012-03-03 14:00 ` Alan McKinnon
2012-03-03 15:04   ` Pandu Poluan
2012-03-03 15:32     ` Alan McKinnon
2012-03-06 10:32 ` Sebastian Pipping
2012-04-13  1:14   ` Michael Mol [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CA+czFiBk8R2vRvQQUTBHvF-_VPvvCPy1zA_LyAamenQYizoUBg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=mikemol@gmail.com \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox