From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-143720-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C67E1381F3
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 16:40:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DBD8621C015;
Mon, 24 Dec 2012 16:39:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ob0-f169.google.com (mail-ob0-f169.google.com [209.85.214.169])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 593D7E06C1
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 16:34:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ob0-f169.google.com with SMTP id v19so6735616obq.28
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 08:34:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type;
bh=7aFqcNXmCE/k0ef3Lpl1tCw6zBk0rvQLlxJyAcB3yfE=;
b=y91GYbZD6nHG5u589RWksoDMdfwtquDLjw5KW/NVA4jc4o5sW+AJQGqoKc6AO8FrY4
HBriIunapkwmpplN/LvEE8WkT0gMmckH6hHVwH1Js387yfRXaPY44COI0C5kWu2hmjxz
T8KXu3XX60E/yxErFZ5HkCHptf2fPJequzWfXfM2wN2XtstqebP4/4nuyAlcJgiLc8jv
mGcRS2SDd54hwWa63uq/vKbdP+DGCDAzbLU3UEumUvTKx3W3/r7SqQxRy2OIy26gH3nc
6vGqjVxgci/sMr/3nd+mfUSdJPDDXcU+NeIewG0J5Tx/ZwFhUFfe6GU6qNX768UVIxCk
LPYg==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.226.103 with SMTP id rr7mr17956227obc.76.1356366850556;
Mon, 24 Dec 2012 08:34:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.76.20.243 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 08:34:10 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <50D87F73.90908@gmail.com>
References: <50CB1942.3020900@gmail.com>
<CAK2H+ecMZ5JO+SGBAdwhGO0HnB8Za-6_EaS1OiQcEJ03a0iQVg@mail.gmail.com>
<50CB4A3C.1030109@gmail.com>
<CAK2H+ecBb-nJ-ZY1efRT+sNCq6v9xgWnwL4GVpY-2j-GNTpJeA@mail.gmail.com>
<50CB5406.7040404@gmail.com>
<CAK2H+efpby+2NnbjReXyGjN3=Xe63j_2K69kCZjDhZcHvjusdA@mail.gmail.com>
<8738z7hgsa.fsf@ist.utl.pt>
<20121216171043.71084070@khamul.example.com>
<CAG2nJkNDLDp2hkz34XXEen4SO1_Mm18G8NNDMZK6tqDr+ddWtA@mail.gmail.com>
<20121217104621.735bf43a@khamul.example.com>
<CA+czFiD+Yv_PXctATd6EYws8kpqb3WFesLZU47jMN5ZJmy3oww@mail.gmail.com>
<20121218163332.7956f31a@khamul.example.com>
<87txrd6pb3.fsf@ist.utl.pt>
<20121223182037.1553813f@khamul.example.com>
<87bodk7lb6.fsf@ist.utl.pt>
<20121224085528.56f535ec@khamul.example.com>
<50D85167.9060309@gmail.com>
<50D85F68.609@gmail.com>
<878v8n5w1q.fsf@ist.utl.pt>
<CA+czFiDOoLuNHGWQCVb0Tphdingu44ttM7K+dUCKN9CP9yc82Q@mail.gmail.com>
<50D87EC3.2090304@gmail.com>
<50D87F73.90908@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2012 11:34:10 -0500
Message-ID: <CA+czFiBifVeskfVqsqh5Td=22rsDk2JWX9Kq5aPEeu+RkNHJCQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Anyone switched to eudev yet?
From: Michael Mol <mikemol@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: f033a694-67a4-4a23-9a5f-403f84d73938
X-Archives-Hash: 96c1f7553d9ccd2a3057fc9e77959b52
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 11:14 AM, Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dale wrote:
>> Michael Mol wrote:
>>> "you wouldn't have this problem if you did *something else*" is a
>>> terrible response. There are very good reasons to use LVM. There are
>>> good (IMO, at least) reasons to avoid using an initr* on Gentoo.
>>> (Those reasons are sprinkled through the thread, some spoken by me,
>>> some spoken by others.) You'll find most of the people in the
>>> discussion so far aren't against initr* in all cases. It's the
>>> increase in number of cases where it becomes technically required
>>> that's a problem. -- :wq
>> You are right on LVM. I put / on a normal partition specifically
>> because I wanted to avoid a init thingy. Only / and /boot are on normal
>> partitions, everything else is on LVM. LVM takes a bit to get used to
>> but when you run out of space or have way to much space, you can move
>> things around easily.
>>
>> LVM is the best move I made in a good while. Thanks to all the folks
>> who helped be convert too. :-D
>>
>> Dale
>>
>> :-) :-)
>>
>
> *me* convert. I proofed it three times and still missed that. I'm a
> awful typer and getting to be a bad proof reader too. :/
>
> Dale
Lay off the eggnog, Dale. Too early yet. :P
--
:wq