public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Mol <mikemol@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Updating libpng: another libtool cockup?
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 10:36:52 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+czFiBfRHQQdV_b5vN6DQETq=npadmuRqsYBwn2W1KKg6F85Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <yu9zki0wr4m.fsf@nyu.edu>

On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Allan Gottlieb <gottlieb@nyu.edu> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19 2011, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>> > revdep-rebuild checks everything, revdep-rebuild --library
>>> > checks just some things.
>>> >
>>> > ebuilds sometimes issue messages to check just the libraries known
>>> > to have been updated, but a full revdep-rebuild after an update
>>> > will catch those anyway.
>>>
>>> Until recently I skipped the "--library" step exactly because I knew
>>> revdep-rebuild will find and fix the broken packages after I delete
>>> the old library.  So, why bother with the --library step, right?
>>>
>>> However.  A few weeks ago I got caught when I deleted one of those
>>> obsolete libraries and only then did I find out that gcc is one of
>>> the packages that depend on it :(
>>>
>>> I don't skip the --library step any more.
>>
>> That's odd behaviour, I wonder what caused the difference.
>>
>> Surely revdep-rebuild itself can't do this different just because you
>> specified a library to compare? I wonder if that lib was maybe in the
>> revdep-rebuild exclude list.
>>
>> I'd be interested to track it down for reference, do you remember the
>> library involved?
>
> It occurs exactly in the case we are discussing libpng
>
> ajglap gottlieb # revdep-rebuild; revdep-rebuild --library '/usr/lib64/libpng14.so.14'
>  * Configuring search environment for revdep-rebuild
>
>  * Checking reverse dependencies
>  * Packages containing binaries and libraries broken by a package update
>  * will be emerged.
>
>  * Collecting system binaries and libraries
>  * Generated new 1_files.rr
>  * Collecting complete LD_LIBRARY_PATH
>  * Generated new 2_ldpath.rr
>  * Checking dynamic linking consistency
> [ 100% ]
>
>  * Dynamic linking on your system is consistent... All done.
>  * Configuring search environment for revdep-rebuild
>
>  * Checking reverse dependencies
>  * Packages containing binaries and libraries using /usr/lib64/libpng14.so.14
>  * will be emerged.
>
>  * Collecting system binaries and libraries
>  * Generated new 1_files.rr
>  * Checking dynamic linking
> [ 8% ]  *   found /usr/bin/dia
> [ 46% ]  *   found /usr/lib64/dia/libaadl_objects.so
>  *   found /usr/lib64/dia/libart_filter.so
>  *   found /usr/lib64/dia/libcairo_filter.so
>  *   found /usr/lib64/dia/libcgm_filter.so
>  *   found /usr/lib64/dia/libchronogram_objects.so
>  *   found /usr/lib64/dia/libcustom_lines_objects.so
>  *   found /usr/lib64/dia/libcustom_objects.so
>  *   found /usr/lib64/dia/libdb_objects.so
>  *   found /usr/lib64/dia/libdia.so
>  *   found /usr/lib64/dia/libdxf_filter.so
>  *   found /usr/lib64/dia/liber_objects.so
>  *   found /usr/lib64/dia/libflowchart_objects.so
>  *   found /usr/lib64/dia/libfs_objects.so
>  *   found /usr/lib64/dia/libgrafcet_objects.so
>  *   found /usr/lib64/dia/libhpgl_filter.so
>  *   found /usr/lib64/dia/libistar_objects.so
>  *   found /usr/lib64/dia/libjackson_objects.so
>  *   found /usr/lib64/dia/libkaos_objects.so
>  *   found /usr/lib64/dia/libmetapost_filter.so
>  *   found /usr/lib64/dia/libmisc_objects.so
>  *   found /usr/lib64/dia/libnetwork_objects.so
>  *   found /usr/lib64/dia/libpgf_filter.so
>  *   found /usr/lib64/dia/libpixbuf_filter.so
>  *   found /usr/lib64/dia/libpostscript_filter.so
>  *   found /usr/lib64/dia/libpstricks_filter.so
>  *   found /usr/lib64/dia/libpython_plugin.so
> ^C *   ...terminated. Removing incomplete 3_broken.rr 3_errors.rr.

Is there no automated way to catch these? --library expects an
argument; how do I know which libraries to feed it?

-- 
:wq



  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-09-19 14:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-18 20:10 [gentoo-user] Updating libpng: another libtool cockup? walt
2011-09-18 20:48 ` Michael Mol
2011-09-18 20:57 ` Thanasis
2011-09-18 21:54   ` Mick
2011-09-18 21:58 ` Allan Gottlieb
2011-09-18 23:39   ` Alan McKinnon
2011-09-19 10:06     ` [gentoo-user] " walt
2011-09-19 14:10       ` Alan McKinnon
2011-09-19 14:20         ` Allan Gottlieb
2011-09-19 14:34           ` Michael Schreckenbauer
2011-09-19 14:58             ` [gentoo-user] Re: Updating libpng: another lib tool cockup? Allan Gottlieb
2011-09-19 15:19               ` Michael Schreckenbauer
2011-09-19 15:28               ` Alan McKinnon
2011-09-19 15:49                 ` Michael Schreckenbauer
2011-09-19 15:49               ` Paul Hartman
2011-09-19 17:57                 ` Allan Gottlieb
2011-09-19 18:19                   ` Paul Hartman
2011-09-19 20:08                     ` Allan Gottlieb
2011-09-20 10:38                   ` Neil Bothwick
2011-09-20 12:57                     ` Allan Gottlieb
2011-09-19 16:30               ` covici
2011-09-19 14:36           ` Michael Mol [this message]
2011-09-19 20:33             ` [gentoo-user] Re: Updating libpng: another libtool cockup? Mark Knecht
2011-09-19 20:41               ` Michael Mol
2011-09-19 20:52                 ` Mark Knecht
2011-09-19 21:10                   ` Michael Schreckenbauer
2011-09-19 21:28                     ` Mark Knecht
2011-09-19 15:07         ` walt
2011-09-19 15:49         ` David W Noon
2011-09-19 20:54           ` Peter Humphrey
2011-09-19 22:29             ` covici
2011-09-20 10:41               ` Neil Bothwick
2011-09-19 14:06     ` [gentoo-user] " Allan Gottlieb
2011-09-19 21:04 ` [gentoo-user] " Nikos Chantziaras

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CA+czFiBfRHQQdV_b5vN6DQETq=npadmuRqsYBwn2W1KKg6F85Q@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=mikemol@gmail.com \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox