From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-134843-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1RxQ2Y-0007H8-8T
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:35:58 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 01B20E0D22;
	Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:35:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-bk0-f53.google.com (mail-bk0-f53.google.com [209.85.214.53])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1510E073C
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:34:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by bkcit16 with SMTP id it16so455986bkc.40
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:34:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=m66B6nmT4xrfhLoU5LkeO6BowZZys5wmg036BUjzQss=;
        b=wftMMNO0YRVFRWS15SHtgzp4qBd8aQyKLpWK0qMIo7691gnXk8tmf6ZQAEKuEzlx5s
         ixei5sM1pHsomkIRaYkumil+rXxZipKRZqhqC2f3tJlXbJ+ppBSkC7R+l7JYUiCZBVcy
         Jm1hbZBFOE51l74zKZBEn0aaEcYsPv1MSjpEI=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.205.133.133 with SMTP id hy5mr10628285bkc.94.1329255286765;
 Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:34:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.205.124.129 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:34:46 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CABMYmBakAPaDiEc0j8uNNeetr5ND75C=X2Wj9NjiK_Z5zGAY0g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAN0CFw2iCtd+Tip23w0EXdm5SEMhTajsHhn=Lp_gHXE0528_xQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEH5T2MZ_4jxPT2d+oEnim+5++SiEfmw-pFxmxFukQtCo767_w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABMYmBakAPaDiEc0j8uNNeetr5ND75C=X2Wj9NjiK_Z5zGAY0g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:34:46 -0500
Message-ID: <CA+czFiBLzD4xa=1uwwtZ4KK5Rad3=Tg2_wi4PwOZr0mqwQR-2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Alternative to firefox?
From: Michael Mol <mikemol@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: ffe04603-e429-4fca-8674-aa6797cf7385
X-Archives-Hash: 8999bbb205b8bd8ac445277bcacef678

On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Alecks Gates <fuzzylunkinz@gmail.com> wrot=
e:
>
> On Feb 14, 2012 4:16 PM, "Paul Hartman" <paul.hartman+gentoo@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Grant <emailgrant@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Has anyone found a GUI alternative to firefox they like that's in
>> > portage? =C2=A0Something minimal preferably but with flash support?
>>
>> Chromium/Chrome, Opera, Konqueror... flash works in all of those and
>> are all fast and minimalistic compared to Firefox. Probably Epiphany,
>> too, but I don't use Gnome so I haven't tried it in years.
>>
> Firefox is quite fast and is also the only browser I've found that can
> easily manage hundreds of tabs + amazing addons.=C2=A0 Firefox has no tru=
e
> alternative, if you consider everything.=C2=A0 The last time I tried Epip=
hany
> flash didn't appear to work out of the box, but I might have done somethi=
ng
> wrong too.

Try Chromium and Seamonkey.

Also, the phrase "...has no true alternative, if you consider
everything." makes you sound like a fanboy. Be careful with that.

--=20
:wq