From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Sb1wr-0003oA-1J for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 03:57:49 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2A038E0230; Sun, 3 Jun 2012 03:57:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lb0-f181.google.com (mail-lb0-f181.google.com [209.85.217.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E83A6E075C for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2012 03:56:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lbbgk8 with SMTP id gk8so2714709lbb.40 for ; Sat, 02 Jun 2012 20:56:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8p4VCPqqGettMdu2CH5hXpLkIrxMAdV9JJiPdasM/Fc=; b=hPDxnQ/Yhq6wxcxABhR66yAv9YG+6+hdeQKsAYfctlCBJcuR13czcpRpXsJhy0+EF4 t1qrQbVsqG+swHmyMrqAvSP7xJ4sNudEkxJRpNuWFOdz27MdvMAtKBlv5br1LQiiCic9 kYR1gwRmUPBt9dF0mnmyUFxwGQxM1x8d9069E0KBykUl9qqSx5PCyhGRFKIYaCqosYcE QcozSVDcO77xEY5nYhneBrD1W5/LY5Qzb9LMrktxUbLEkiITV7rCfiJEIHQq043H3nyC QErRX2FtklJO3Pgm6Olef4DJYMSdR22a9w6U9LC8RM/fCHV+Va+PZer82gh20xMSxCFq EpgA== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.144.138 with SMTP id sm10mr8109575lab.22.1338695761966; Sat, 02 Jun 2012 20:56:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.130.98 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Jun 2012 20:56:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120603033410.GC12597@madrid> References: <20120603033410.GC12597@madrid> Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2012 23:56:01 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Just a heads-up, I think =sys-libs/glibc-2.14.1-r3 is a stinker. From: Michael Mol To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: e1fe8f06-0742-442f-86fa-58c3fd6c2bc6 X-Archives-Hash: a698f378ef513134c765c8307fb732ac On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Dmitry Goncharov wrote: > On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 10:52:12PM -0400, Michael Mol wrote: >> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Michael Mol wrote: >> Wow. Just wow. This is incredible. >> >> This is repeatable for me. >> > >> =C2=A0* The problem occurred while executing the ebuild file named >> =C2=A0* 'glibc-2.14.1-r3.ebuild' located in the '/var/db/pkg/sys- >> > >> CFLAGS=3D"-O2 -pipe -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3D2 -march=3Dcore2 -mcx16 -msahf >> --param l1-cache-size=3D32 --param l1-cache-line-size=3D64 --param >> l2-cache-size=3D4096 -mtune=3Dcore2 -ggdb3" >> CXXFLAGS=3D"${CFLAGS}" > > Can you upgrage to glibc-2.15? Sure. It's going to be another full reinstall. > Can you tweak you gcc flags to something more conventional and see if the > problem persists? Those CFLAGS should be equivalent to: CFLAGS=3D"-O2 -pipe -ggdb3 --march=3Dnative". But I'll try making it just -O2 -pipe --march=3Dnative. > If you are interested in submitting a patch to the upstream then you can = build > the glibc test suite with your gcc flags and check if the tests pass. If it gets things fixed. I have two machines which have been offline for almost two months from this. --=20 :wq