[gentoo-user] can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse

[gentoo-user] can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse

[LinuxIsOne]

Hello,

Does one have the experience for the following:

gentoo vs openSUSE

for ease of use, better navigation, applications working perfectly
without any crash(es), better up gradations, smooth working,
etc..etc...

Best Regards.

Re: [gentoo-user] can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse

[Andrew Tchernoivanov]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1212 bytes --]

Hi!

I use gentoo on my desktop (P4, 2 Gb RAM) and openSuSe on laptop (Lenovo
x200s). They both work perfectly well, especially when you precisely know
what you are expecting from OS )) Regarding your questions:

About DE:
 I've tried to use Enlightenment with SuSe, and worked very well (only
little changes with networking).

Applications:
 I have texlive, pdftk, sipp and ns-2 working perfectly on both systems.
General applications like LibreOffice,
Gimp, browser works fine too.

The only thin is really annoying in openSuSe is /usr/lib/tracker-* which
loads CPU by 90% while searching
for media files, etc.. I recommend to disable it - I haven't found anything
useful by using this application.

Hope this helps you.

P.S. Sorry it there were some mistakes - English isn't my native language.


On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 6:41 PM, LinuxIsOne <linuxisone@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Does one have the experience for the following:
>
> gentoo vs openSUSE
>
> for ease of use, better navigation, applications working perfectly
> without any crash(es), better up gradations, smooth working,
> etc..etc...
>
> Best Regards.
>
>


-- 
С уважением,
Черноиванов Андрей

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1706 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse

[LinuxIsOne]

2011/12/2 Andrew Tchernoivanov:

> Hi!

Hello.

> I use gentoo on my desktop (P4, 2 Gb RAM) and openSuSe on laptop (Lenovo
> x200s). They both work perfectly well, especially when you precisely know
> what you are expecting from OS )) Regarding your questions:

Ok well.

> About DE:
>  I've tried to use Enlightenment with SuSe, and worked very well (only
> little changes with networking).

> Applications:
>  I have texlive, pdftk, sipp and ns-2 working perfectly on both systems.
> General applications like LibreOffice,
> Gimp, browser works fine too.

> The only thin is really annoying in openSuSe is /usr/lib/tracker-* which
> loads CPU by 90% while searching
> for media files, etc.. I recommend to disable it - I haven't found anything
> useful by using this application.

Okay.

> Hope this helps you.

Yeah.

> P.S. Sorry it there were some mistakes - English isn't my native language.

Not a problem, that is also not a native language for me!

Why I asked to just know if Gentoo is better or openSUSE is better for
a novice who want to learn Linux, just coming directly from
Windows...that's why...However, I have liked the Ubuntu (since it is
easy and nice) but don't know about all Linux in general....is Gentoo
is also using the same Linux which Ubuntu is using?

Cheers.

Re: [gentoo-user] can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse

[Dale]

LinuxIsOne wrote:
> Why I asked to just know if Gentoo is better or openSUSE is better for 
> a novice who want to learn Linux, just coming directly from 
> Windows...that's why...However, I have liked the Ubuntu (since it is 
> easy and nice) but don't know about all Linux in general....is Gentoo 
> is also using the same Linux which Ubuntu is using? Cheers. 

"Better" depends on what you expect.  If you want to learn about Linux, 
Gentoo will teach you a lot.  Heck, you will learn a lot by the time you 
get it installed and get to your first boot prompt.  I get the 
impression that you don't realize how in depth Gentoo is.  Gentoo can be 
installed by a Linux newcomer but it will not be a walk in the park.  I 
used Mandrake for 6 months or so and it took me about 3 tries to get to 
a point where Gentoo would boot up.  It took a while more to get 
everything working still.  I had to redo my kernel several times.

The point I am making is, it is not how different Gentoo is from other 
distros, it's whether it is something you need and want to put the time 
in to learn.  Gentoo doesn't have a GUI installer and you do have to 
compile everything you install.  I recently installed Kubuntu for my 
Brother.  It is a walk in the park compared to installing Gentoo.  Did I 
learn anything about Linux, not hardly.  I don't think Kubuntu is made 
to teach a lot about Linux.  It's just made to install easily and 
quickly without much fuss.

I do hope you will try Gentoo tho.  It is sort of addicting at times.  lol

Dale

:-)  :-)

-- 
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words!

Re: [gentoo-user] can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse

[Pandu Poluan]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3124 bytes --]

On Dec 3, 2011 3:06 AM, "Dale" <rdalek1967@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> LinuxIsOne wrote:
>>
>> Why I asked to just know if Gentoo is better or openSUSE is better for a
novice who want to learn Linux, just coming directly from Windows...that's
why...However, I have liked the Ubuntu (since it is easy and nice) but
don't know about all Linux in general....is Gentoo is also using the same
Linux which Ubuntu is using? Cheers.
>
>
> "Better" depends on what you expect.  If you want to learn about Linux,
Gentoo will teach you a lot.  Heck, you will learn a lot by the time you
get it installed and get to your first boot prompt.  I get the impression
that you don't realize how in depth Gentoo is.  Gentoo can be installed by
a Linux newcomer but it will not be a walk in the park.  I used Mandrake
for 6 months or so and it took me about 3 tries to get to a point where
Gentoo would boot up.  It took a while more to get everything working
still.  I had to redo my kernel several times.
>
> The point I am making is, it is not how different Gentoo is from other
distros, it's whether it is something you need and want to put the time in
to learn.  Gentoo doesn't have a GUI installer and you do have to compile
everything you install.  I recently installed Kubuntu for my Brother.  It
is a walk in the park compared to installing Gentoo.  Did I learn anything
about Linux, not hardly.  I don't think Kubuntu is made to teach a lot
about Linux.  It's just made to install easily and quickly without much
fuss.
>
> I do hope you will try Gentoo tho.  It is sort of addicting at times.  lol
>

Indeed! Especially control freaks like me :-)

But seriously, I personally found Gentoo to be the most logical Linux
distro. Yes, the initial barrier (installation) is daunting, so to speak,
but after doing it successfully, one can immediately intuit "what's going
on". Installing and configuring other packages becomes piece of  cake.

The logical way of Gentoo even extends to its packages. For instance,
packages that are meant to be run as services/daemons will *certainly* have
a pair of files in conf.d and init.d. Customizable environs are in env.d
and profile.d. And so on.

I've used Linux exclusively as servers, and I have dabbled with Red Hat,
CentOS, Ubuntu, Debian, and Arch, but Gentoo wins hands down for its
logicality.

Not to mention that I can customize my servers exactly to my
specifications, instead of having to put up with cruft that the distro
maintainer feel as a "must have". Case in point : how many distros allow
you to choose which cron daemon you want to use?

Another plus point is the almost complete devel tools provided out of the
box: the gcc suite. Now if I happen across an open source project that
hasn't made it yet to the portage tree, I can just download and compile it
myself.

Related to that, is the great job Portage did regarding dependency hell.
Since I am no longer hostage to the whims of the distro maintainer re:
versions of libraries installed, if a program needs a library that's newer
than the current 'stable' version, I can just keyword the needed version
and compile away.

Rgds,

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3481 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse

[Frank Steinmetzger]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 950 bytes --]

On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 07:53:58AM +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote:
> On Dec 3, 2011 3:06 AM, "Dale" <rdalek1967@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > LinuxIsOne wrote:
> >>
> >> Why I asked to just know if Gentoo is better or openSUSE is better for a
> novice who want to learn Linux, just coming directly from Windows...that's
> why...However, I have liked the Ubuntu (since it is easy and nice) but
> don't know about all Linux in general....is Gentoo is also using the same
> Linux which Ubuntu is using? Cheers.

A small off-topic hint, Pandu: your mailer is breaking the quoting, because it
only sets a quote marker to the first line of a paragraph, omitting the
following lines (See my quote of your message above). Can you please look into
your settings to correct it? Thanks.
-- 
Gruß | Greetings | Qapla'
I forbid any use of my email addresses with Facebook services.

Experience -- specialist term for tried mistakes of older employees.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse

[Pandu Poluan]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 944 bytes --]

On Dec 3, 2011 8:25 AM, "Frank Steinmetzger" <Warp_7@gmx.de> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 07:53:58AM +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote:
> > On Dec 3, 2011 3:06 AM, "Dale" <rdalek1967@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > LinuxIsOne wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Why I asked to just know if Gentoo is better or openSUSE is better
for a
> > novice who want to learn Linux, just coming directly from
Windows...that's
> > why...However, I have liked the Ubuntu (since it is easy and nice) but
> > don't know about all Linux in general....is Gentoo is also using the
same
> > Linux which Ubuntu is using? Cheers.
>
> A small off-topic hint, Pandu: your mailer is breaking the quoting,
because it
> only sets a quote marker to the first line of a paragraph, omitting the
> following lines (See my quote of your message above). Can you please look
into
> your settings to correct it? Thanks.

*sighs*

Blame it on Google...

I'm typing on Android's Gmail client.

Rgds,

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1267 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse

[Michael Mol]

On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Pandu Poluan <pandu@poluan.info> wrote:
> Another plus point is the almost complete devel tools provided out of the
> box: the gcc suite. Now if I happen across an open source project that
> hasn't made it yet to the portage tree, I can just download and compile it
> myself.

This. Very much this. My dive into Gentoo came as I was fed up with
Debian and Ubuntu having buggy and/or outdated versions of multimedia
encoding packages while trying to configure a box specced for live
transcoding of h.264 to something my PS3 would like.

-- 
:wq

Re: [gentoo-user] can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse

[Pandu Poluan]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 845 bytes --]

On Dec 3, 2011 9:14 AM, "Michael Mol" <mikemol@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Pandu Poluan <pandu@poluan.info> wrote:
> > Another plus point is the almost complete devel tools provided out of
the
> > box: the gcc suite. Now if I happen across an open source project that
> > hasn't made it yet to the portage tree, I can just download and compile
it
> > myself.
>
> This. Very much this. My dive into Gentoo came as I was fed up with
> Debian and Ubuntu having buggy and/or outdated versions of multimedia
> encoding packages while trying to configure a box specced for live
> transcoding of h.264 to something my PS3 would like.
>

Ha, same with me :-)

But in my case, it's esoteric stuffs like: latest iptables, xtables-addons
(and its ipset modules), fetchmail, postgreSQL, ... and an initramfs-less
system :-)

Rgds,

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1086 bytes --]

[gentoo-user] Re: can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse

[Jack Byer]

Michael Mol wrote:

> This. Very much this. My dive into Gentoo came as I was fed up with
> Debian and Ubuntu having buggy and/or outdated versions of multimedia
> encoding packages while trying to configure a box specced for live
> transcoding of h.264 to something my PS3 would like.
> 

I came to Gentoo from Linux From Scratch because I wanted something more 
user friendly when it came to keeping track of package dependencies and 
compilation procedures.

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse

[Dale]

Jack Byer wrote:
> Michael Mol wrote:
>
>> This. Very much this. My dive into Gentoo came as I was fed up with
>> Debian and Ubuntu having buggy and/or outdated versions of multimedia
>> encoding packages while trying to configure a box specced for live
>> transcoding of h.264 to something my PS3 would like.
>>
> I came to Gentoo from Linux From Scratch because I wanted something more
> user friendly when it came to keeping track of package dependencies and
> compilation procedures.
>
>
>

That is how I describe Gentoo, Linux from Scratch with a package manager 
and other neat tools.  I think Gentoo is about as close to that as it 
gets.  We all know portage is getting really good and full of features 
over the past few years.  I may not agree with Zac on some recent 
default settings but he sure has pushed portage a long long ways 
forward.  If only Gentoo could wash dishes now.  File a feature request 
on b.g.o?  LOL

Dale

:-)  :-)

-- 
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words!

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse

[Jack Byer]

Dale wrote:
>> I came to Gentoo from Linux From Scratch because I wanted something more
>> user friendly when it came to keeping track of package dependencies and
>> compilation procedures.
>>
>>
>>
> 
> That is how I describe Gentoo, Linux from Scratch with a package manager
> and other neat tools.  I think Gentoo is about as close to that as it
> gets.  We all know portage is getting really good and full of features
> over the past few years.  I may not agree with Zac on some recent
> default settings but he sure has pushed portage a long long ways
> forward.  If only Gentoo could wash dishes now.  File a feature request
> on b.g.o?  LOL

I just came across a perfect example of why I started using Gentoo rather 
than LFS in the src_prepare() function of the openssh ebuilds. Look at all 
that complexity that someone else dealt with for you so that emerge Just 
Works.

Re: [gentoo-user] can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse

[Frank Steinmetzger]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1362 bytes --]

On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 09:09:38PM -0500, Michael Mol wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Pandu Poluan <pandu@poluan.info> wrote:
> > Another plus point is the almost complete devel tools provided out of the
> > box: the gcc suite. Now if I happen across an open source project that
> > hasn't made it yet to the portage tree, I can just download and compile it
> > myself.
> 
> This. Very much this. My dive into Gentoo came as I was fed up with
> Debian and Ubuntu having buggy and/or outdated versions of multimedia
> encoding packages while trying to configure a box specced for live
> transcoding of h.264 to something my PS3 would like.

Though Gentoo was my first distro to begin with, the devel stuff in
Debian/Ubuntu is also a big nuisance for me, because you have to “spam” the
equivalent of your world file with numerous dev packages or libs if you want to
install some application from source (like I once tried with Amarok in Debian
Squeeze).
On the other hand one could of course argue that Gentoo is wasting a lot of
space because it is always installing all dev files, like /usr/include,
/lib/**/*.a and stuff. But that’s something else. :)
-- 
Gruß | Greetings | Qapla'
I forbid any use of my email addresses with Facebook services.

Bosses are like timpani: the more hollow they are, the louder they sound.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse

[Dale]

Pandu Poluan wrote:
>
>
> Indeed! Especially control freaks like me :-)
>
> But seriously, I personally found Gentoo to be the most logical Linux 
> distro. Yes, the initial barrier (installation) is daunting, so to 
> speak, but after doing it successfully, one can immediately intuit 
> "what's going on". Installing and configuring other packages becomes 
> piece of  cake.
>
> The logical way of Gentoo even extends to its packages. For instance, 
> packages that are meant to be run as services/daemons will *certainly* 
> have a pair of files in conf.d and init.d. Customizable environs are 
> in env.d and profile.d. And so on.
>
> I've used Linux exclusively as servers, and I have dabbled with Red 
> Hat, CentOS, Ubuntu, Debian, and Arch, but Gentoo wins hands down for 
> its logicality.
>
> Not to mention that I can customize my servers exactly to my 
> specifications, instead of having to put up with cruft that the distro 
> maintainer feel as a "must have". Case in point : how many distros 
> allow you to choose which cron daemon you want to use?
>
> Another plus point is the almost complete devel tools provided out of 
> the box: the gcc suite. Now if I happen across an open source project 
> that hasn't made it yet to the portage tree, I can just download and 
> compile it myself.
>
> Related to that, is the great job Portage did regarding dependency 
> hell. Since I am no longer hostage to the whims of the distro 
> maintainer re: versions of libraries installed, if a program needs a 
> library that's newer than the current 'stable' version, I can just 
> keyword the needed version and compile away.
>
> Rgds,
>


This is true but the OP may not really need this type of control.  Most 
people, newcomers especially, just want something that is easy and sort 
of learn a bit and see if Linux is for them.  Some people just aren't 
wanting to be geeky at all.  They want a OS that will take care of 
everything for them.  In that case, Gentoo is not going to be worth the 
effort.

Me, I have a Desktop with no real special needs.  I just wanted to be 
able to learn about Linux, not have some bunch of junk that I never ever 
intend to use installed and be able to update without standing on my 
head with my small toe up one nostril trying to jump hoops.  Mandrake 
had a horrible update process and I got tired of it quick.  If you could 
insert CD, install and not need to update anything, then you were good 
to go.  If you install and then need to update something, oooops.  Flip 
upside down and assume the position.

Gentoo does have a lot of good points, especially for me.  It is just 
not going to be easy and hand holding at first for a newcomer.  The OP 
will learn a lot and as I pointed out, it can be addicting.  Just turn 
off the quiet output setting and see what Linux is really all about.  ;-)

Dale

:-)  :-)

-- 
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words!

Re: [gentoo-user] can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse

[Stroller]

On 2 December 2011, at 17:48, LinuxIsOne wrote:
> ...
> Why I asked to just know if Gentoo is better or openSUSE is better for
> a novice who want to learn Linux, just coming directly from
> Windows...that's why...However, I have liked the Ubuntu (since it is
> easy and nice) but don't know about all Linux in general....is Gentoo
> is also using the same Linux which Ubuntu is using?

IMO you need to try it for yourself. If you have an old PC or a spare hard-drive then it doesn't cost you anything to install a distro and try it for a few days.

IMO the most important thing about a distro is not it's technical pros and cons, but simply how it suits you - how you get along with it.

Having said that, you mention Ubuntu in your comment above. If you haven't used Ubuntu yet, then I suggest it for a few months first. If you have, can you tell us why you're thinking of changing?

Stroller.

Re: Re: [gentoo-user] can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse

[Volker Armin Hemmann]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1035 bytes --]

>Why I asked to just know if Gentoo is better or openSUSE is better for
>a novice who want to learn Linux, just coming directly from
>Windows...that's why...However, I have liked the Ubuntu (since it is
>easy and nice) but don't know about all Linux in general....is Gentoo
>is also using the same Linux which Ubuntu is using?


since you don't even know what linux is - go opensuse. It is much, much easier to install and setup.

Gentoo is only for you if you like tuning, configuring and if you want the system be as close as your personal ideal as possible. Which means:

reading and learning a lot
making a lot of mistakes
redoing
be prepared to pull out shell based text tools and fix the mess you created,

Go opensuse. it is much more usable for a novice.

And to answer your question:

no, gentoo is not using the same linux as ubuntu
nor does opensuse.

All distributions use some linux version and add their own patches.

With the exception of gentoo where you can easily use a completely unpatched linux kernel.

-- 
#163933

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 5733 bytes --]

[gentoo-user] Re: can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse

[Harry Putnam]

One point no one has mentioned and I've wondered from time to time
myself is whether one can expect gentoo to continue into the future
for a long while, as compared to the likely hood of opensuse or maybe
debian that has been around a very long time. 

It seemed at one time a year or so ago that gentoo's longevity was
questionable. (Possibly my own mis-perception)

For the OP, a few posters have mentioned that under gentoo, every
thing is compiled from scratch, but it was not made clear that it
happens again and again at most updates.

No one has made clear that there is a very HUGE amount of time sunk
into compiling absolutely everything.

A single update, if one lets updating slip a bit, can literally take
days to compile. And more days to reconfigure so that everything works
again. 

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse

[Neil Bothwick]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1324 bytes --]

On Sun, 04 Dec 2011 07:44:32 -0600, Harry Putnam wrote:

> It seemed at one time a year or so ago that gentoo's longevity was
> questionable. (Possibly my own mis-perception)

The discussions about Gentoo's imminent demise are an annual tradition.

> For the OP, a few posters have mentioned that under gentoo, every
> thing is compiled from scratch, but it was not made clear that it
> happens again and again at most updates.

If the OP had read so  little about Gentoo that they haven't gleaned that
much, it certainly is not the distro for them.

> No one has made clear that there is a very HUGE amount of time sunk
> into compiling absolutely everything.

> A single update, if one lets updating slip a bit, can literally take
> days to compile. And more days to reconfigure so that everything works
> again. 

Is the time it takes the computer (not you) to compile updates that much
of an issue. Unless you desperately need some feature only in the new
release, you can carry on using the computer while it compiles the new
versions for you. As for reconfiguring, that has nothing to do with
whether the packages were compiled on  your computer or a distro's build
server, but configs rarely change that significantly.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Love is grand. Divorce is a few grand more.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse

[Alan McKinnon]

On Sun, 4 Dec 2011 13:55:28 +0000
Neil Bothwick <neil@digimed.co.uk> wrote:

> > For the OP, a few posters have mentioned that under gentoo, every
> > thing is compiled from scratch, but it was not made clear that it
> > happens again and again at most updates.  
> 
> If the OP had read so  little about Gentoo that they haven't gleaned
> that much, it certainly is not the distro for them.

I'd go so far as to say that if a user does not already have a
reasonable grasp of how Gentoo works, can't give you a one-paragraph
description of Gentoo that is reasonably accurate, and can't describe
the concepts of how an ebuild would work, then Gentoo is not the
distro for that user.

Gentoo is like fine Italian vehicles - you can get stunning
performance IF you know what you are doing, know what all the bits mean
and are prepared to invest the insane amount of time and effort it
requires (per the rule of diminishing returns). There's always a few
edge cases like James, who simply cannot find any other useful way to
build his embedded images. I suspect James looked at the landscape and
saw two choices: build his own build machinery, or use Gentoo's which
fits most of his needs most of the time.

As soon as someone asks a question like "which is better, OpenSuSE
or Gentoo?" you almost always know the answer cannot possibly be
Gentoo. That user has to play with OpenSuSE for a while to discover for
himself why this is so.

I'm going to get flamed for this, and be accused of being elitist. It
happens every time. And that's OK:

If SuSE/RedHat were likened to good ready-made furniture, Debian would
be top-grade DIY kits (they follow a formula but the user has some
freedom to tweak what they build) and Gentoo wouldn't be furniture, it
would be a cabinet-maker (with a concession that the user doesn't have
to grow their own trees anymore, he can at least buy ready cut planks).
LFS is the one that requires you to grow your own trees as well.

There's a place in this world for amateur and professional
cabinet-makers, but do we really want to recommend that the average DIY
guy has to become one?

I say suggest that the potential tinkerers cut their teeth on Debian
first then switch to Gentoo on their own determinism when they
understand the cost/benefit ratio themselves and can make an informed
decision.

-- 
Alan McKinnnon
alan.mckinnon@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse

[Dale]

Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Dec 2011 13:55:28 +0000
> Neil Bothwick<neil@digimed.co.uk>  wrote:
>
>>> For the OP, a few posters have mentioned that under gentoo, every
>>> thing is compiled from scratch, but it was not made clear that it
>>> happens again and again at most updates.
>> If the OP had read so  little about Gentoo that they haven't gleaned
>> that much, it certainly is not the distro for them.
> I'd go so far as to say that if a user does not already have a
> reasonable grasp of how Gentoo works, can't give you a one-paragraph
> description of Gentoo that is reasonably accurate, and can't describe
> the concepts of how an ebuild would work, then Gentoo is not the
> distro for that user.
>
> Gentoo is like fine Italian vehicles - you can get stunning
> performance IF you know what you are doing, know what all the bits mean
> and are prepared to invest the insane amount of time and effort it
> requires (per the rule of diminishing returns). There's always a few
> edge cases like James, who simply cannot find any other useful way to
> build his embedded images. I suspect James looked at the landscape and
> saw two choices: build his own build machinery, or use Gentoo's which
> fits most of his needs most of the time.
>
> As soon as someone asks a question like "which is better, OpenSuSE
> or Gentoo?" you almost always know the answer cannot possibly be
> Gentoo. That user has to play with OpenSuSE for a while to discover for
> himself why this is so.
>
> I'm going to get flamed for this, and be accused of being elitist. It
> happens every time. And that's OK:

No flames from me.  I agree.  I wouldn't recommend Gentoo to someone who 
has no, or even very little, Linux experience.  Looking back, I was one 
heck of a noob when I installed Gentoo.  It had to be fools luck that I 
got it done.  Then again, the docs were, and still are, really good.  
You can dang near copy and paste the commands.

>
> If SuSE/RedHat were likened to good ready-made furniture, Debian would
> be top-grade DIY kits (they follow a formula but the user has some
> freedom to tweak what they build) and Gentoo wouldn't be furniture, it
> would be a cabinet-maker (with a concession that the user doesn't have
> to grow their own trees anymore, he can at least buy ready cut planks).
> LFS is the one that requires you to grow your own trees as well.
>
> There's a place in this world for amateur and professional
> cabinet-makers, but do we really want to recommend that the average DIY
> guy has to become one?
>
> I say suggest that the potential tinkerers cut their teeth on Debian
> first then switch to Gentoo on their own determinism when they
> understand the cost/benefit ratio themselves and can make an informed
> decision.
>

They can also do the install to a separate drive from within another 
distro too.  That way they can have the docs, forums and other useful 
tools available.  I know, I have heard of Knoppix too.  Just saying.

Dale

:-)  :-)

-- 
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words!

Miss the compile output?  Hint:
EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--quiet-build=n"

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse

[Alex Schuster]

Dale writes:

> No flames from me.  I agree.  I wouldn't recommend Gentoo to someone who 
> has no, or even very little, Linux experience.  Looking back, I was one 
> heck of a noob when I installed Gentoo.  It had to be fools luck that I 
> got it done.  Then again, the docs were, and still are, really good.  
> You can dang near copy and paste the commands.

I know some people who had very few experience with Linux. But they
succeeded in installing Gentoo. And they learnt a lot by doing so. If
you installed Gentoo, you know Linux.

That's what I like about Gentoo. You know what you are doing, and many
integral parts are easier to understand than with another distro, where
things are hidden by GUI config tools.

But if you just want to have a Linux to play around with, go with a
binary distro. You can install Gentoo later if you like, even while
using the Linux you already have. If you have some space onthe disk to
add other partitions. Did I mention yet that LVM is nice for this?

	Wonko

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse

[Alan McKinnon]

On Sun, 04 Dec 2011 18:16:19 +0100
Alex Schuster <wonko@wonkology.org> wrote:

> > No flames from me.  I agree.  I wouldn't recommend Gentoo to
> > someone who has no, or even very little, Linux experience.  Looking
> > back, I was one heck of a noob when I installed Gentoo.  It had to
> > be fools luck that I got it done.  Then again, the docs were, and
> > still are, really good. You can dang near copy and paste the
> > commands.  
> 
> I know some people who had very few experience with Linux. But they
> succeeded in installing Gentoo. And they learnt a lot by doing so. If
> you installed Gentoo, you know Linux.

I think we all know at least one person like that. Myself, I've
trained more than just a few (the training salesperson had a knack for
signing up people who had the smarts to cope with Gentoo).

But for every one like that, there are at least 10 more that can't, and
so often in this game I find that others are just not able to spot those
10. And worse, the 10 often give up and go back to Windows.

So the question is not really "can the user do it?", it is rather "how
will *this* person in front of me right now be best served?"

An equally good question is "does this person right now asking me a
question have what it takes to dive into Gentoo blindly, and swim?"

The answers to those questions are what should guide you.

> That's what I like about Gentoo. You know what you are doing, and many
> integral parts are easier to understand than with another distro,
> where things are hidden by GUI config tools.

Precisely, which is why RedHat is great for a Windows sysadmin who
really does want a plug-n-play distro.

Debian is great for people who want to tinker safely - you get the
plug-n-play of a binary distro and you also get build tools that don't
explode in your face every time you try do something that is not
exactly 100% TheTrueRedHatWay.

> But if you just want to have a Linux to play around with, go with a
> binary distro. You can install Gentoo later if you like, even while
> using the Linux you already have. If you have some space onthe disk to
> add other partitions. Did I mention yet that LVM is nice for this?

Don't forget VirtualBox/VMWare/KVM/Xen and everything else like them :-)



-- 
Alan McKinnnon
alan.mckinnon@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse

[Neil Bothwick]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 486 bytes --]

On Sun, 4 Dec 2011 19:37:27 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:

> An equally good question is "does this person right now asking me a
> question have what it takes to dive into Gentoo blindly, and swim?"

The other question is "do I have time to keep diving in to rescue this
person when they get out of their depth". When you recommend Gentoo, you
also volunteer to provide support.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

One of the nice things about standards is that there are so many of them.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse

[Alan McKinnon]

On Sun, 4 Dec 2011 20:45:26 +0000
Neil Bothwick <neil@digimed.co.uk> wrote:

> On Sun, 4 Dec 2011 19:37:27 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> 
> > An equally good question is "does this person right now asking me a
> > question have what it takes to dive into Gentoo blindly, and swim?"
> 
> The other question is "do I have time to keep diving in to rescue this
> person when they get out of their depth". When you recommend Gentoo,
> you also volunteer to provide support.

I was going to mention something like that too. But every time I do, I
get flamed badly for being an elitist dick. Must have something to do
with the way I express myself :-)

I reckoned this time I'd try a different tack and attempt to keep the
thread on-topic and relevant... 


-- 
Alan McKinnnon
alan.mckinnon@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse

[Neil Bothwick]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 862 bytes --]

On Mon, 5 Dec 2011 00:11:08 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:

> > The other question is "do I have time to keep diving in to rescue this
> > person when they get out of their depth". When you recommend Gentoo,
> > you also volunteer to provide support.  
> 
> I was going to mention something like that too. But every time I do, I
> get flamed badly for being an elitist dick. Must have something to do
> with the way I express myself :-)

No comment :P

> I reckoned this time I'd try a different tack and attempt to keep the
> thread on-topic and relevant... 

Well, it is relevant, although it is not specific to Gentoo. It's the
same when you recommend that a Windows using friend tries Linux (any
flavour) - be prepared for plenty of phone calls.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

What's the greatest world-wide use of cowhide? To hold cows together.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse

[Alan McKinnon]

On Sun, 04 Dec 2011 18:16:19 +0100
Alex Schuster <wonko@wonkology.org> wrote:

> > No flames from me.  I agree.  I wouldn't recommend Gentoo to
> > someone who has no, or even very little, Linux experience.  Looking
> > back, I was one heck of a noob when I installed Gentoo.  It had to
> > be fools luck that I got it done.  Then again, the docs were, and
> > still are, really good. You can dang near copy and paste the
> > commands.  
> 
> I know some people who had very few experience with Linux. But they
> succeeded in installing Gentoo. And they learnt a lot by doing so. If
> you installed Gentoo, you know Linux.
> 
> That's what I like about Gentoo. You know what you are doing, and many
> integral parts are easier to understand than with another distro,
> where things are hidden by GUI config tools.
> 
> But if you just want to have a Linux to play around with, go with a
> binary distro. You can install Gentoo later if you like, even while
> using the Linux you already have. If you have some space onthe disk to
> add other partitions. Did I mention yet that LVM is nice for this?



-- 
Alan McKinnnon
alan.mckinnon@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse

[Michael Mol]

On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Harry Putnam <reader@newsguy.com> wrote:
> One point no one has mentioned and I've wondered from time to time
> myself is whether one can expect gentoo to continue into the future
> for a long while, as compared to the likely hood of opensuse or maybe
> debian that has been around a very long time.
>
> It seemed at one time a year or so ago that gentoo's longevity was
> questionable. (Possibly my own mis-perception)

From my rudimentary gatherings while reading related blogs and
historical perspectives, there are just two or three people who have
been at the core of Gentoo for a very, very long time. Gentoo has long
been the work of many hands, but these guys have been around the block
a far more times. I don't know how well Gentoo would fare if one or
three of them were to drop off the face of the earth.

> For the OP, a few posters have mentioned that under gentoo, every
> thing is compiled from scratch, but it was not made clear that it
> happens again and again at most updates.
>
> No one has made clear that there is a very HUGE amount of time sunk
> into compiling absolutely everything.

I'd say "bull", but that depends *greatly* on your hardware. When I
talk about Gentoo with my friends, they admit to having tried it, but
then say it took them a long, long time to build a system on their
486.  You don't want to run Gentoo compiles on a 486. You probably
ought not to run Gentoo compiles on any x86 processor older than an
Athlon64 or Intel Core chip.

For me, an emerge -e @world takes somewhere between four and ten
hours, depending if it's the eight-core Xeon box or the quad-core
Phenom box. As others noted in the build-speed optimization thread,
it's pretty trivial to tune the system so that it doesn't impact many
(most?) normal user activities, and can go on in the background.
Otherwise, a full system rebuild isn't much more time consuming than
something like a dist-upgrade on Debian or Ubuntu.

There are factors you can tweak to go one way or the other, too. You
might use bindists for chromium, firefox, thunderbird, xulrunner,
libreoffice... That'd probably cut my Phenom system's compile time by
about a quarter. I know installing a full KDE package set would
*increase* build time on my system by about the same.

The vast majority of the time, you're not building a full package set,
but just ten or eleven packages. (if you let things slip a week or
two, like I'm apt to do)

>
> A single update, if one lets updating slip a bit, can literally take
> days to compile.

AFAIK, it can't take longer than an emerge -e @world, which I described above.

> And more days to reconfigure so that everything works
> again.

That seems very unusual, unless by "a bit" you're talking on the order
of six months.


-- 
:wq

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse

[Dale]

Harry Putnam wrote:
> One point no one has mentioned and I've wondered from time to time
> myself is whether one can expect gentoo to continue into the future
> for a long while, as compared to the likely hood of opensuse or maybe
> debian that has been around a very long time.
>
> It seemed at one time a year or so ago that gentoo's longevity was
> questionable. (Possibly my own mis-perception)
>
> For the OP, a few posters have mentioned that under gentoo, every
> thing is compiled from scratch, but it was not made clear that it
> happens again and again at most updates.
>
> No one has made clear that there is a very HUGE amount of time sunk
> into compiling absolutely everything.
>
> A single update, if one lets updating slip a bit, can literally take
> days to compile. And more days to reconfigure so that everything works
> again.
>

People have been claiming Gentoo is dying for years.  I seriously doubt 
that is going to happen anytime soon.

I did sort of mention the compile times.  Thing is, we don't know what 
sort of rig the OP has.  If he has a really old rig, that could result 
is some long compile times.  If it is a recently bought/built rig, then 
it may be fast enough to not matter.

It seems no matter how much info a post has, there is always something 
missing.  :/  I'm just glad I buy my tea loose.  I can read the tea 
leaves easier.  O_O

Dale

:-)  :-)

-- 
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words!

Re: [gentoo-user] can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse

[Mick]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 3072 bytes --]

On Friday 02 Dec 2011 14:41:29 LinuxIsOne wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Does one have the experience for the following:
> 
> gentoo vs openSUSE
> 
> for ease of use, better navigation, applications working perfectly
> without any crash(es), better up gradations, smooth working,
> etc..etc...
> 
> Best Regards.

If you want *exactly* what OpenSUSE have included in their distro then 
OpenSUSE is for you.  Some applications and the whole system will run slower 
than Gentoo.  Invariably some applications could experience crashes and what 
not - any distro would from time to time have such problems and may not be 
distro specific anyway, but application specific.

If you want to include additional applications or versions of applications 
that OpenSUSE repos do not cater for, then you may run into dependency hell.  
At best, some apps will just not install or work as intended.  At worst you 
could break the underlying distro if you try hard enough and have to 
reinstall.

With Gentoo you have higher flexibility on what you install and portage is 
definitely thousands times better than YaST, in terms of configurabilty.  You 
will still get the odd application that is buggy, but as a rule your system 
will run lighter and faster because each binary is compiled from source with 
the CFALGS and USE flags that you have specified for your system.  On the other 
hand it will take some time and effort to keep your Gentoo up to date.

Another difference between OpenSUSE and Gentoo is that you will not need to 
reinstall Gentoo to get the latest desktop, or init system or what-ever system 
wide upgrade is next.  With OpenSUSE upgrades imply a reinstallation (unless 
YaST got cleverer since the last time I used it).  Invariably you will also 
never need to reinstall Gentoo to fix any breakages - most problems you may 
come across you will learn how to recover from with clever use of portage.

In conclusion:

If you prefer quick installation and easy/quick updates, but with limited 
choice on what gets installed and how it is configured, and the OpenSUSE suite 
of packages will meet your application needs comprehensively, then OpenSUSE is 
a well polished distro that will fit the bill.

If you value higher performance and a much higher degree of configurability, 
then Gentoo will be your choice;  but that comes at the expense of a 
protracted installation process (especially if you have not done this before) 
and some admin time on a regular basis to keep your system and applications up 
to date.

With Gentoo you will be *forced* to learn a lot to install your system and 
keep it running.  With OpenSUSE the learning curve will likely be considerably 
flatter.

It would be advisable to try them both out in LiveCDs (or even install them in 
VMs) to see which you feel more comfortable working with.  For a Gentoo based 
LiveCD you could try Sabayon:  http://www.sabayon.org/ and this may also be 
used for a quick (binary) installation of a Gentoo-like system.

HTH.
-- 
Regards,
Mick

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse

[Indi]

On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 06:40:03PM +0100, Michael Mol wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 12:10 PM, LinuxIsOne <linuxisone@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Indi <thebeelzebubtrigger@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> In fact, I like gentoo and FreeBSD best for low-spoec hardware.
> >
> > What does low-spec hardware mean?
> 
> Whatever the default setup of the latest release of Ubuntu runs
> sluggish on. (Or what a previous version of Ubuntu ran on, but current
> versions won't)
> 
> While somewhat flippant, that seems a pretty reasonable way to think about it.
> 

Seems to me Ubuntu is sluggish no matter what hardware you have.
Peopple pay such a high price to avoid learning anything...

But I was thinking more about anything x86 or ppc and single core, 
or stuff like intel atom. Anything ARM. Anything pre core2duo from 
intel, for sure, as well as any ppc Mac.

-- 
caveat utilitor
♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ 

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse

[Michael Mol]

On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Indi <thebeelzebubtrigger@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 06:40:03PM +0100, Michael Mol wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 12:10 PM, LinuxIsOne <linuxisone@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Indi <thebeelzebubtrigger@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> In fact, I like gentoo and FreeBSD best for low-spoec hardware.
>> >
>> > What does low-spec hardware mean?
>>
>> Whatever the default setup of the latest release of Ubuntu runs
>> sluggish on. (Or what a previous version of Ubuntu ran on, but current
>> versions won't)
>>
>> While somewhat flippant, that seems a pretty reasonable way to think about it.
>>
>
> Seems to me Ubuntu is sluggish no matter what hardware you have.

That's why I gave the description I did. What seems sluggish to you
may not seem sluggish to me. It certainly won't seem sluggish to my
grandmother...

It tunes itself very nicely to the perceptions and needs of the
individual in question.

-- 
:wq

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse

[Mick]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 1472 bytes --]

On Monday 05 Dec 2011 20:20:38 Michael Mol wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Indi <thebeelzebubtrigger@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 06:40:03PM +0100, Michael Mol wrote:
> >> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 12:10 PM, LinuxIsOne <linuxisone@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Indi <thebeelzebubtrigger@gmail.com> 
wrote:
> >> >> In fact, I like gentoo and FreeBSD best for low-spoec hardware.
> >> > 
> >> > What does low-spec hardware mean?
> >> 
> >> Whatever the default setup of the latest release of Ubuntu runs
> >> sluggish on. (Or what a previous version of Ubuntu ran on, but current
> >> versions won't)
> >> 
> >> While somewhat flippant, that seems a pretty reasonable way to think
> >> about it.
> > 
> > Seems to me Ubuntu is sluggish no matter what hardware you have.
> 
> That's why I gave the description I did. What seems sluggish to you
> may not seem sluggish to me. It certainly won't seem sluggish to my
> grandmother...
> 
> It tunes itself very nicely to the perceptions and needs of the
> individual in question.

I no longer run Gentoo on my Pentium IBM laptop - let's face it with 72M RAM 
even fluxbox was a bit sluggish!  Ha!

I do however run it on my 1998 vintage Pentium 3 laptop and before that on a 
Pentium 3 Coppermine.  KDE is sluggish and rebuilding KDE takes a day or so.  
That's why I don't run a full KDE ...  ;p  Only some KDE apps on e17.
-- 
Regards,
Mick

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse

[LinuxIsOne]

On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Mick <michaelkintzios@gmail.com> wrote:

> I do however run it on my 1998 vintage Pentium 3 laptop and before that on a
> Pentium 3 Coppermine.  KDE is sluggish and rebuilding KDE takes a day or so.
> That's why I don't run a full KDE ...  ;p  Only some KDE apps on e17.

However, Getoo could be great (I really don't know) but installing
Ubuntu is working like a charm (I still don't know anything in Linux!)
But I don't know why the creators of Gentoo made it so difficult for
beginners! It is typical then....

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse

[Neil Bothwick]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 440 bytes --]

On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 05:54:22 -0500, LinuxIsOne wrote:

> But I don't know why the creators of Gentoo made it so difficult for
> beginners!

Because Gentoo is not for beginners, there are already plenty of distros,
like Mandriva and Ubuntu, catering for first time users. Gentoo is a
"power users" distro.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

A printer consists of three main parts: the case, the jammed paper tray
and the blinking red light.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse

[ny6p01]

On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 11:15:31AM +0000, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 05:54:22 -0500, LinuxIsOne wrote:
> 
> > But I don't know why the creators of Gentoo made it so difficult for
> > beginners!
> 
> Because Gentoo is not for beginners, there are already plenty of distros,
> like Mandriva and Ubuntu, catering for first time users. Gentoo is a
> "power users" distro.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Neil Bothwick
> 
> A printer consists of three main parts: the case, the jammed paper tray
> and the blinking red light.


And yet the documentation is clear enough for anyone to follow along. Which
leads me to my next point: the Gentoo documentation is far and away the best
of any distro I have tried. Whoever writes these docs deserves a heap of
accolades for his efforts.

Terry

[gentoo-user] Re: can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse

[Grant Edwards]

On 2011-12-06, ny6p01@gmail.com <ny6p01@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 11:15:31AM +0000, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 05:54:22 -0500, LinuxIsOne wrote:
>> 
>> > But I don't know why the creators of Gentoo made it so difficult for
>> > beginners!
>> 
>> Because Gentoo is not for beginners, there are already plenty of distros,
>> like Mandriva and Ubuntu, catering for first time users. Gentoo is a
>> "power users" distro.

> And yet the documentation is clear enough for anyone to follow along.
> Which leads me to my next point: the Gentoo documentation is far and
> away the best of any distro I have tried.

Definitely.

The Ubuntu documentation seems to be mainly user-forum threads full of
wrong answers posted by people who didn't understand the question.

> Whoever writes these docs deserves a heap of accolades for his
> efforts.

The Gentoo docs are indeed brilliant.

-- 
Grant Edwards               grant.b.edwards        Yow! Here I am in the
                                  at               POSTERIOR OLFACTORY LOBULE
                              gmail.com            but I don't see CARL SAGAN
                                                   anywhere!!

Re: [gentoo-user] can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse

[Stroller]

On 6 December 2011, at 23:25, Grant Edwards wrote:
> ...
> The Ubuntu documentation seems to be mainly user-forum threads full of
> wrong answers posted by people who didn't understand the question.

I tried Ubuntu, hated this *so* much.

I'm sure all the respondents were just trying to be helpful, but they made Ubuntu look like the distro of idiots.

Stroller.

Re: [gentoo-user] can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse

[LinuxIsOne]

On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 5:20 AM, Stroller <stroller@stellar.eclipse.co.uk> wrote:

> I tried Ubuntu, hated this *so* much.

> I'm sure all the respondents were just trying to be helpful, but they made Ubuntu look like the distro of idiots.

How do you say like this? Can you give me an example please?

Re: [gentoo-user] can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse

[James Broadhead]

On 8 December 2011 06:57, LinuxIsOne <linuxisone@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 5:20 AM, Stroller <stroller@stellar.eclipse.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> I tried Ubuntu, hated this *so* much.
>
>> I'm sure all the respondents were just trying to be helpful, but they made Ubuntu look like the distro of idiots.
>
> How do you say like this? Can you give me an example please?
>

The next time you have a problem with anything related to linux,
follow a link to an Ubuntu user forum. Unfortunately, the quality of
advice on them tends to be pretty low. :-(

Re: [gentoo-user] can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse

[LinuxIsOne]

On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 5:58 AM, James Broadhead
<jamesbroadhead@gmail.com> wrote:

> The next time you have a problem with anything related to linux,
> follow a link to an Ubuntu user forum. Unfortunately, the quality of
> advice on them tends to be pretty low. :-(

Really?

Re: [gentoo-user] can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse

[Alan McKinnon]

On Thu, 8 Dec 2011 08:55:48 -0500
LinuxIsOne <linuxisone@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 5:58 AM, James Broadhead
> <jamesbroadhead@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > The next time you have a problem with anything related to linux,
> > follow a link to an Ubuntu user forum. Unfortunately, the quality of
> > advice on them tends to be pretty low. :-(
> 
> Really?
> 

Don't take our word for it, go look for yourself.

I could give you examples of how that forum works, I could give you
links that show what we are saying, but NOTHING can prepare you for
what you really find on the Ubuntu user forums.

Like I said, just go there and have a look for yourself.

-- 
Alan McKinnnon
alan.mckinnon@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-user] can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse

[LinuxIsOne]

On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> wrote:

> Don't take our word for it, go look for yourself.

> I could give you examples of how that forum works, I could give you
> links that show what we are saying, but NOTHING can prepare you for
> what you really find on the Ubuntu user forums.

Okay but at least Ubuntu is good for new users and Windows convert and
for those doesn't it give a learning curve in Linux?

Re: [gentoo-user] can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse

[James Broadhead]

On 8 December 2011 15:10, LinuxIsOne <linuxisone@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Don't take our word for it, go look for yourself.
>
>> I could give you examples of how that forum works, I could give you
>> links that show what we are saying, but NOTHING can prepare you for
>> what you really find on the Ubuntu user forums.
>
> Okay but at least Ubuntu is good for new users and Windows convert and
> for those doesn't it give a learning curve in Linux?

That's debatable; it generally means that the amount of time that
passes before they realise that Linux is not Windows is increased. It
definitely gets them booted into a desktop environment quicker, but it
doesn't really save on the learning curve - something will go awry
sooner or later, and the fact that they've had the command-line hidden
from them until that first fateful trip to the forums won't feel like
such a benefit then.

Re: [gentoo-user] can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse

[LinuxIsOne]

On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 10:18 AM, James Broadhead
<jamesbroadhead@gmail.com> wrote:

> That's debatable; it generally means that the amount of time that
> passes before they realise that Linux is not Windows is increased. It
> definitely gets them booted into a desktop environment quicker, but it
> doesn't really save on the learning curve - something will go awry
> sooner or later, and the fact that they've had the command-line hidden
> from them until that first fateful trip to the forums won't feel like
> such a benefit then.

Ok, I agree with you but I have just installed since I had to Linux
experience but everything is working like a charm. I don't know if any
problem would come.

Re: [gentoo-user] can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse

[LinuxIsOne]

On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 10:35 AM, LinuxIsOne <linuxisone@gmail.com> wrote:

>> That's debatable; it generally means that the amount of time that
>> passes before they realise that Linux is not Windows is increased. It
>> definitely gets them booted into a desktop environment quicker, but it
>> doesn't really save on the learning curve - something will go awry
>> sooner or later, and the fact that they've had the command-line hidden
>> from them until that first fateful trip to the forums won't feel like
>> such a benefit then.

> Ok, I agree with you but I have just installed since I had to Linux
> experience but everything is working like a charm. I don't know if any
> problem would come.

I mean i have no Linux experience and everything is working like a
charm in Ubuntu and yes you are correct to say that command line is
hidden which is the real gem in linux. I agree with you in this
regard. But I guess (not sure) if Ubuntu would give me the Linux
learning environment?

Re: [gentoo-user] can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse

[Michael Mol]

On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 10:36 AM, LinuxIsOne <linuxisone@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 10:35 AM, LinuxIsOne <linuxisone@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> That's debatable; it generally means that the amount of time that
>>> passes before they realise that Linux is not Windows is increased. It
>>> definitely gets them booted into a desktop environment quicker, but it
>>> doesn't really save on the learning curve - something will go awry
>>> sooner or later, and the fact that they've had the command-line hidden
>>> from them until that first fateful trip to the forums won't feel like
>>> such a benefit then.
>
>> Ok, I agree with you but I have just installed since I had to Linux
>> experience but everything is working like a charm. I don't know if any
>> problem would come.
>
> I mean i have no Linux experience and everything is working like a
> charm in Ubuntu and yes you are correct to say that command line is
> hidden which is the real gem in linux. I agree with you in this
> regard. But I guess (not sure) if Ubuntu would give me the Linux
> learning environment?

As long as we're talking about *you*, and not about someone you're
setting things up for, here's what I'd suggest:

1) Keep your existing Ubuntu setup operational, at least for a while.
Gentoo isn't something you should dive into unless you have a
fallback, at least until you learn enough to be able to fix the things
you'll encounter.
2) Set up Gentoo as a second machine; it really is a great way to
learn how a lot of the moving parts in Linux work.

Once you've got Gentoo doing everything you want it to do, and you've
burned yourself a couple times, you'll be in a good position to make a
decision for yourself. I've actually bounced back and forth between
Ubuntu and Gentoo twice in the last three or four years, but I think
I'm finally ready to go steady with Gentoo. :)

Ubuntu is great for "it just works." Ubuntu isn't so great for "it
just keeps working." Neither is Gentoo, for that matter, but, at least
with Gentoo, you'll know how to fix it.


-- 
:wq

Re: [gentoo-user] can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse

[LinuxIsOne]

On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Michael Mol <mikemol@gmail.com> wrote:

> As long as we're talking about *you*, and not about someone you're
> setting things up for, here's what I'd suggest:

> 1) Keep your existing Ubuntu setup operational, at least for a while.
> Gentoo isn't something you should dive into unless you have a
> fallback, at least until you learn enough to be able to fix the things
> you'll encounter.
> 2) Set up Gentoo as a second machine; it really is a great way to
> learn how a lot of the moving parts in Linux work.

> Once you've got Gentoo doing everything you want it to do, and you've
> burned yourself a couple times, you'll be in a good position to make a
> decision for yourself. I've actually bounced back and forth between
> Ubuntu and Gentoo twice in the last three or four years, but I think
> I'm finally ready to go steady with Gentoo. :)

> Ubuntu is great for "it just works." Ubuntu isn't so great for "it
> just keeps working." Neither is Gentoo, for that matter, but, at least
> with Gentoo, you'll know how to fix it.

Ah, thanks for the nice suggestions, I would keep a note of it. I
would install in one old machine, I mean I would try to install Gentoo
after going through the docs..(of course, required in Gentoo). But one
more request can you also suggest about openSUSE? Is openSUSE lies in
the middle between Ubuntu and Gentoo?

Re: [gentoo-user] can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse

[Mick]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 2354 bytes --]

On Thursday 08 Dec 2011 16:11:56 LinuxIsOne wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Michael Mol <mikemol@gmail.com> wrote:
> > As long as we're talking about *you*, and not about someone you're
> > setting things up for, here's what I'd suggest:
> > 
> > 1) Keep your existing Ubuntu setup operational, at least for a while.
> > Gentoo isn't something you should dive into unless you have a
> > fallback, at least until you learn enough to be able to fix the things
> > you'll encounter.
> > 2) Set up Gentoo as a second machine; it really is a great way to
> > learn how a lot of the moving parts in Linux work.
> > 
> > Once you've got Gentoo doing everything you want it to do, and you've
> > burned yourself a couple times, you'll be in a good position to make a
> > decision for yourself. I've actually bounced back and forth between
> > Ubuntu and Gentoo twice in the last three or four years, but I think
> > I'm finally ready to go steady with Gentoo. :)
> > 
> > Ubuntu is great for "it just works." Ubuntu isn't so great for "it
> > just keeps working." Neither is Gentoo, for that matter, but, at least
> > with Gentoo, you'll know how to fix it.
> 
> Ah, thanks for the nice suggestions, I would keep a note of it. I
> would install in one old machine, I mean I would try to install Gentoo
> after going through the docs..(of course, required in Gentoo). But one
> more request can you also suggest about openSUSE? Is openSUSE lies in
> the middle between Ubuntu and Gentoo?

OpenSUSE is not that different from Ubuntu, but is a long way from Gentoo.

There is no way to meaningfully compare *Ubuntu and OpenSUSE, because it 
depends what suits your taste and preferences.  You can install both, run them 
for a few weeks and see which you feel more comfortable with.

Last time I installed OpenSUSE (some years ago) I had to reinstall it when 
time came to upgrade to the latest version.  With Ubuntu the upgrade path was 
pretty seamless.  The Ubuntu devs had it all scripted out via the update 
manager.  So, Ubuntu is I think easier to look after and keep upgrading than 
OpenSUSE was back then.  Not sure how things have evolved since then in the 
OpenSUSE world.  CentOS was no better than OpenSUSE in this regard.

So, for a newcomer to Linux I would recommend *Ubuntu.
-- 
Regards,
Mick

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse

[Frank Steinmetzger]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3134 bytes --]

On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 08:09:34PM +0000, Mick wrote:

> > > Ubuntu is great for "it just works." Ubuntu isn't so great for "it
> > > just keeps working." Neither is Gentoo, for that matter, but, at least
> > > with Gentoo, you'll know how to fix it.
> > 
> > Ah, thanks for the nice suggestions, I would keep a note of it. I
> > would install in one old machine, I mean I would try to install Gentoo
> > after going through the docs..(of course, required in Gentoo). But one
> > more request can you also suggest about openSUSE? Is openSUSE lies in
> > the middle between Ubuntu and Gentoo?
> 
> OpenSUSE is not that different from Ubuntu, but is a long way from Gentoo.
> 
> There is no way to meaningfully compare *Ubuntu and OpenSUSE, because it 
> depends what suits your taste and preferences.  You can install both, run them 
> for a few weeks and see which you feel more comfortable with.
> 
> Last time I installed OpenSUSE (some years ago) I had to reinstall it when 
> time came to upgrade to the latest version.  With Ubuntu the upgrade path was 
> pretty seamless.  The Ubuntu devs had it all scripted out via the update 
> manager.  So, Ubuntu is I think easier to look after and keep upgrading than 
> OpenSUSE was back then.  Not sure how things have evolved since then in the 
> OpenSUSE world.  CentOS was no better than OpenSUSE in this regard.
> 
> So, for a newcomer to Linux I would recommend *Ubuntu.

I did this in the past. But recently I’m reassessing this, with Ubuntu changing
the default look and the way it works with every other release (remember the
hassle about window buttons to the left by default?). I can’t really explain
-- let alone justify -- to a newbie, who had to adapt from Win to Ubuntu that
he has to do so again, whether he wants to or not. Plus it seems to me they
are trying to become Apple in the Linux world, with own services (and design).
I am totally at a loss with entry-level distros right now. 

I tried Mint, also the new one with Gnome 3. The praised Mint menu seems
overloaded to me (it shows too much at once IMHO). I somehow dislike custom
layers over a standard interface, much like, if I bought an HTC Android, I
would reflash it without Sense UI, but I’m digressing.

OpenSuse seems even more overloaded. Albeit it provides a whole environment,
Yast was full of stuff a simple user will never need. It also caused a very
long and voluminous installation process.
I must add though that I peeked into both Mint and Suse only for a day or so,
without ever using it myself, so I don’t know jack about update procedures.

A friend of mine wanted Linux, so I installed Debian stable for her with KDE
4.4. It’s not bleeding edge, but it works because it doesn’t change much (hence
keeps working) and because she doesn’t do a lot of fancy stuff. (And also
because I used Debian testing for a while, so I know a bit about how to do some
helpdesking).
-- 
Gruß | Greetings | Qapla'
I forbid any use of my email addresses with Facebook services.

Everything is poisonous -- it just comes down to the dosage.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse

[Claudio Roberto França Pereira]

Wait a minute, an actual doctor installed and maintain Gentoo boxes?

Re: [gentoo-user] can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse

[Frank Steinmetzger]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 356 bytes --]

On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 01:02:14AM -0200, Claudio Roberto França Pereira wrote:
> Wait a minute, an actual doctor installed and maintain Gentoo boxes?

??
-- 
Gruß | Greetings | Qapla'
I forbid any use of my email addresses with Facebook services.

A hammer is a wonderful tool,
but it is plain unsuitable for cleaning windows.  (SelfHTML forum)

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse

[Claudio Roberto França Pereira]

>By Lorenzo Badieri:
>[...] My high school was centered around
>humanities/classical studies: ancient greek, latin, philosophy; after
>high school, I managed to get into MED SCHOOL. So, no computer
>science/informatics at all. However, I was really curios about
>computers, and I messed up my family's desktop pc a couple of times :) [...]

Re: [gentoo-user] can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse

[LinuxIsOne]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1807 bytes --]

On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Frank Steinmetzger <Warp_7@gmx.de> wrote:


> I did this in the past. But recently I’m reassessing this, with Ubuntu
> changing
> the default look and the way it works with every other release (remember
> the
> hassle about window buttons to the left by default?). I can’t really
> explain
> -- let alone justify -- to a newbie, who had to adapt from Win to Ubuntu
> that
> he has to do so again, whether he wants to or not. Plus it seems to me they
> are trying to become Apple in the Linux world, with own services (and
> design).
> I am totally at a loss with entry-level distros right now.
>
> I tried Mint, also the new one with Gnome 3. The praised Mint menu seems
> overloaded to me (it shows too much at once IMHO). I somehow dislike custom
> layers over a standard interface, much like, if I bought an HTC Android, I
> would reflash it without Sense UI, but I’m digressing.
>
> OpenSuse seems even more overloaded. Albeit it provides a whole
> environment,
> Yast was full of stuff a simple user will never need. It also caused a very
> long and voluminous installation process.
> I must add though that I peeked into both Mint and Suse only for a day or
> so,
> without ever using it myself, so I don’t know jack about update procedures.
>
> A friend of mine wanted Linux, so I installed Debian stable for her with
> KDE
> 4.4. It’s not bleeding edge, but it works because it doesn’t change much
> (hence
> keeps working) and because she doesn’t do a lot of fancy stuff. (And also
> because I used Debian testing for a while, so I know a bit about how to do
> some
> helpdesking).
>

I have come to conclusion that almost all Linux work almost in the same way
since they have the same kernel, however, this is what I think.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2069 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse

[Pandu Poluan]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1149 bytes --]

On Dec 10, 2011 8:50 PM, "LinuxIsOne" <linuxisone@gmail.com> wrote:
>

----- >8 snip

>
> I have come to conclusion that almost all Linux work almost in the same
way since they have the same kernel, however, this is what I think.

I don't mean to scare you, but most Linux distros work differently.

First, there might be differences in how they install a package. There's
RPM, apt, pacman, portage, and others.

Second, there are differences in the "init" system. Gentoo users OpenRC,
Ubuntu uses upstart, and others use SysVinit, systemd, and so on.

And even you can't guarantee that the kernels are the same. Many distros
introduce their own distro-specific patches to the vanilla kernel. With
Gentoo, it's even more complicated, as most experienced Gentooroids will
configure and compile their own kernels.

(The last paragraph, however, is the reason why Gentoo is so secure:
attackers can't be sure that the vuln they're targeting is located at the
right spot, *if* the vuln exists at all. Throw in hardened patches like
GrSecurity, PAX, and SELinux... well, you get the idea.)

((No wonder NASDAQ uses Gentoo for its infrastructure))

Rgds,

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1350 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse

[LinuxIsOne]

On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Pandu Poluan <pandu@poluan.info> wrote:

> I don't mean to scare you, but most Linux distros work differently.

> First, there might be differences in how they install a package. There's
> RPM, apt, pacman, portage, and others.

> Second, there are differences in the "init" system. Gentoo users OpenRC,
> Ubuntu uses upstart, and others use SysVinit, systemd, and so on.

"init" system? I am first time hearing this, may be, I would read it
later or sometimes about what is it....

> And even you can't guarantee that the kernels are the same. Many distros
> introduce their own distro-specific patches to the vanilla kernel. With
> Gentoo, it's even more complicated, as most experienced Gentooroids will
> configure and compile their own kernels.

> (The last paragraph, however, is the reason why Gentoo is so secure:
> attackers can't be sure that the vuln they're targeting is located at the
> right spot, *if* the vuln exists at all. Throw in hardened patches like
> GrSecurity, PAX, and SELinux... well, you get the idea.)

Oh I see. Thanks for clarification Pandu.

> ((No wonder NASDAQ uses Gentoo for its infrastructure))

Great to hear.

Re: [gentoo-user] can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse

[Alan McKinnon]

On Sat, 10 Dec 2011 08:46:16 -0500
LinuxIsOne <linuxisone@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Frank Steinmetzger <Warp_7@gmx.de>
> wrote:
> 
> 
> > I did this in the past. But recently I’m reassessing this, with
> > Ubuntu changing
> > the default look and the way it works with every other release
> > (remember the
> > hassle about window buttons to the left by default?). I can’t really
> > explain
> > -- let alone justify -- to a newbie, who had to adapt from Win to
> > Ubuntu that
> > he has to do so again, whether he wants to or not. Plus it seems to
> > me they are trying to become Apple in the Linux world, with own
> > services (and design).
> > I am totally at a loss with entry-level distros right now.
> >
> > I tried Mint, also the new one with Gnome 3. The praised Mint menu
> > seems overloaded to me (it shows too much at once IMHO). I somehow
> > dislike custom layers over a standard interface, much like, if I
> > bought an HTC Android, I would reflash it without Sense UI, but I’m
> > digressing.
> >
> > OpenSuse seems even more overloaded. Albeit it provides a whole
> > environment,
> > Yast was full of stuff a simple user will never need. It also
> > caused a very long and voluminous installation process.
> > I must add though that I peeked into both Mint and Suse only for a
> > day or so,
> > without ever using it myself, so I don’t know jack about update
> > procedures.
> >
> > A friend of mine wanted Linux, so I installed Debian stable for her
> > with KDE
> > 4.4. It’s not bleeding edge, but it works because it doesn’t change
> > much (hence
> > keeps working) and because she doesn’t do a lot of fancy stuff.
> > (And also because I used Debian testing for a while, so I know a
> > bit about how to do some
> > helpdesking).
> >
> 
> I have come to conclusion that almost all Linux work almost in the
> same way since they have the same kernel, however, this is what I
> think.


Not quite.

A very small selection of all possible Unixes work the same.
Ubuntu and Debian are quite similar as they have common roots.
RedHat works rather like an old Fedora (and to some degree that's almost
exactly what it is).
Gentoo looks and feels like whatever you decide to make it to be
(because it is so highly configurable and adaptable)

The fact is that the kernel make very little difference to how the
overall system works. YOU do not interact with the kernel, YOU interact
with a collection of programs called "userland", and these things can
all be very different. For example, I'm looking at three computers
right now that all run Linux, and they are all very very different:

- this laptop, which is set up as a traditional Unix with X,
- my phone running Android 
- my wireless router/modem which runs busybox

Be careful of making rash conclusions about Linux. A Linux system is not
"like" anything particularly, it is whatever the person who built it
decided it should be.

What you will find is that desktop Linuxes share many common elements.
This is not surprising - all versions of Windows share many common
elements too.

-- 
Alan McKinnnon
alan.mckinnon@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-user] can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse

[LinuxIsOne]

On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> wrote:

> A very small selection of all possible Unixes work the same.
> Ubuntu and Debian are quite similar as they have common roots.
> RedHat works rather like an old Fedora (and to some degree that's almost
> exactly what it is).
> Gentoo looks and feels like whatever you decide to make it to be
> (because it is so highly configurable and adaptable)

> The fact is that the kernel make very little difference to how the
> overall system works. YOU do not interact with the kernel, YOU interact
> with a collection of programs called "userland", and these things can
> all be very different. For example, I'm looking at three computers
> right now that all run Linux, and they are all very very different:

> - this laptop, which is set up as a traditional Unix with X,
> - my phone running Android
> - my wireless router/modem which runs busybox

> Be careful of making rash conclusions about Linux. A Linux system is not
> "like" anything particularly, it is whatever the person who built it
> decided it should be.

> What you will find is that desktop Linuxes share many common elements.
> This is not surprising - all versions of Windows share many common
> elements too.

Thanks for this explanation. I earlier (before this post) used to
think that it is the kernel which is a deciding factor..., but yes it
is correct to say NO for this. Linux is really highly configurable at
least for this reason is a better choice and especially Gentoo - which
could be made to work like anything we wish (as you say)  --- really
great to know. ON one of the machine and in the time to come, I wold
first read how to install Gentoo and then would definitely (100%) try
to install Gentooo ---- at least a successful installation would make
me know many things as far as Gentoo is considered.. Eventually I
would come to these great mailing lists for the help, but since I am
in another job, so it would take much time, but I would try....

Thanks.

Re: [gentoo-user] can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse

[Sebastian Beßler]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 430 bytes --]

On 08.12.2011 17:11, LinuxIsOne wrote:

> Ah, thanks for the nice suggestions, I would keep a note of it. I
> would install in one old machine, 

You could use virtualbox to create a virtual PC and install Gentoo
there. That would eliminate the required space for a second monitor,
keyboard and mouse.

Virtualbox is mostly self-explaining so that should not be so much of a
problem.

Greetings

Sebastian Beßler


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 900 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse

[LinuxIsOne]

On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Sebastian Beßler
<sebastian@darkmetatron.de> wrote:

> Virtualbox is mostly self-explaining so that should not be so much of a
> problem.

VB works from within another OS or needs memory of HDD?

Re: [gentoo-user] can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse

[Alan McKinnon]

On Sat, 10 Dec 2011 08:47:47 -0500
LinuxIsOne <linuxisone@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Sebastian Beßler
> <sebastian@darkmetatron.de> wrote:
> 
> > Virtualbox is mostly self-explaining so that should not be so much
> > of a problem.
> 
> VB works from within another OS or needs memory of HDD?
> 

VirtualBox is a program that runs on a working system with a
functioning OS. Like all programs it needs resources like memory and
hard disk space. Unlike most programs it usually uses a LOT of memory
and hard disk space to be useful.

-- 
Alan McKinnnon
alan.mckinnon@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-user] can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse

[LinuxIsOne]

On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> wrote:

> VirtualBox is a program that runs on a working system with a
> functioning OS. Like all programs it needs resources like memory and
> hard disk space. Unlike most programs it usually uses a LOT of memory
> and hard disk space to be useful.

Oh I see. I see VB in Ubuntu...(how to) since right now I have Ubuntu.....

Re: [gentoo-user] can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse

[Michael Mol]

On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 10:18 AM, James Broadhead
<jamesbroadhead@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 8 December 2011 15:10, LinuxIsOne <linuxisone@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Don't take our word for it, go look for yourself.
>>
>>> I could give you examples of how that forum works, I could give you
>>> links that show what we are saying, but NOTHING can prepare you for
>>> what you really find on the Ubuntu user forums.
>>
>> Okay but at least Ubuntu is good for new users and Windows convert and
>> for those doesn't it give a learning curve in Linux?
>
> That's debatable; it generally means that the amount of time that
> passes before they realise that Linux is not Windows is increased. It
> definitely gets them booted into a desktop environment quicker, but it
> doesn't really save on the learning curve - something will go awry
> sooner or later, and the fact that they've had the command-line hidden
> from them until that first fateful trip to the forums won't feel like
> such a benefit then.
>

I got started with Linux via Red Hat 5.2. (Pre-Fedora, pre-RHEL days).
I used it for only a few days before switching to Debian. If I hadn't
seen Red Hat's relatively automagic setup of X, and the availability
of all the tools to do things I wanted using a GUI interface, I
probably would have hopped back to Windows 95.

As it was, seeing that GUI and knowing that a familiar interface was
what left me willing to deal with the couple weeks it took me to learn
how to set up XFree86 3.3.6 on Debian.[1] Fortunately, just about
every Linux distro, including Gentoo, has much better resource for
getting a GUI up and running, so a modern newbie experience shouldn't
be nearly so taxing on initial patience.

Sure, being able to learn a system inside and out is a good thing, but
you need to get past that initial hurdle before you're ready to tackle
it, and Ubuntu handles that initial hurdle quite well. Give a user six
months to a year, and they'll grow tired of Ubuntu constantly breaking
their customizations, and they'll probably switch to Debian or Linux
Mint. I've watched that leap several times now. A few of them
eventually leave Debian or Mint for Gentoo. Some land on Fedora or
OpenSuSE, but they're usually heavily working with RHEL or CentOS in
other contexts.

[1] Luckily, I wasn't even an adolescent yet; I don't think I'd have
had the time or patience for that as an adult.

-- 
:wq

Re: [gentoo-user] can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse

[Lorenzo Bandieri]

2011/12/8 LinuxIsOne <linuxisone@gmail.com>:
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Don't take our word for it, go look for yourself.
>
>> I could give you examples of how that forum works, I could give you
>> links that show what we are saying, but NOTHING can prepare you for
>> what you really find on the Ubuntu user forums.
>
> Okay but at least Ubuntu is good for new users and Windows convert and
> for those doesn't it give a learning curve in Linux?
>

Well, maybe my experience will be useful to you. Ubuntu was my
introduction to linux. First, I'll start by saying that before linux I
didn't know absolutely nothing about computers and the like. I had my
first desktop pc at home (windows xp) when I was 15 or 16 years old.
Before that, only my father owned a pc, for his work, and I was not
allowed to use it. My high school was centered around
humanities/classical studies: ancient greek, latin, philosophy; after
high school, I managed to get into med school. So, no computer
science/informatics at all. However, I was really curios about
computers, and I messed up my family's desktop pc a couple of times :)
At 19, I was given a laptop, only for me (windows vista, if I remember
correctly). I decided to install linux on it, and I chose Ubuntu
because it was the distro of wich I heard about the most. After some
months, I decided to move away from ubuntu because I felt it was too
limited - I wanted to learn. In the following two years I tried other
distros, but at last I felt that only two were apt to me: Gentoo and
Arch Linux. Of these two, I tend to prefer Gentoo.

What's the point in this story: I started as a computer illiterate. I
think that, had I chosen Gentoo (or Arch, or Slackware) as my first
distro, probably I would have given up with linux. I could never get
started so abruptly with the terminal, CLI etc. I needed a gradual
introduction, to get familiar with filesystems, directory hierarchy,
basilar command line usage etc. Ubuntu, at the time, provided this.
Just remember that *probably* you won't learn much by using Ubuntu. If
you want to learn, when you're ready, you will have to move on. You
learn more after an attempt to install Gentoo than in one year of
plain Ubuntu usage :)

At least, that is my real life experience and my opinion. I'm just one
user; on this ML there are really knowledgeable users, so you should
listen to them[1].

[1] BTW, I just want to say that I really love this ML. Thanks guys.

Hope this helps,

Lorenzo

-- 
Nothing is interesting if you're not interested.

Re: [gentoo-user] can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse

[LinuxIsOne]

On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Lorenzo Bandieri
<lorenzo.bandieri@gmail.com> wrote:

> Well, maybe my experience will be useful to you. Ubuntu was my
> introduction to linux. First, I'll start by saying that before linux I
> didn't know absolutely nothing about computers and the like. I had my
> first desktop pc at home (windows xp) when I was 15 or 16 years old.
> Before that, only my father owned a pc, for his work, and I was not
> allowed to use it. My high school was centered around
> humanities/classical studies: ancient greek, latin, philosophy; after
> high school, I managed to get into med school. So, no computer
> science/informatics at all. However, I was really curios about
> computers, and I messed up my family's desktop pc a couple of times :)
> At 19, I was given a laptop, only for me (windows vista, if I remember
> correctly). I decided to install linux on it, and I chose Ubuntu
> because it was the distro of wich I heard about the most. After some
> months, I decided to move away from ubuntu because I felt it was too
> limited - I wanted to learn. In the following two years I tried other
> distros, but at last I felt that only two were apt to me: Gentoo and
> Arch Linux. Of these two, I tend to prefer Gentoo.

That's really nice to know.

> What's the point in this story: I started as a computer illiterate. I
> think that, had I chosen Gentoo (or Arch, or Slackware) as my first
> distro, probably I would have given up with linux. I could never get
> started so abruptly with the terminal, CLI etc. I needed a gradual
> introduction, to get familiar with filesystems, directory hierarchy,
> basilar command line usage etc. Ubuntu, at the time, provided this.
> Just remember that *probably* you won't learn much by using Ubuntu. If
> you want to learn, when you're ready, you will have to move on. You
> learn more after an attempt to install Gentoo than in one year of
> plain Ubuntu usage :)

> At least, that is my real life experience and my opinion. I'm just one
> user; on this ML there are really knowledgeable users, so you should
> listen to them[1].

> [1] BTW, I just want to say that I really love this ML. Thanks guys.

Yeahs thanks and your story really gives nice things to remember. I
would definitely try now Gentoo and since it is an advanced version of
Linux usage, so people here are, of course, having more knowledge and
more mature, including you. When you say 'You learn more after an
attempt to install Gentoo than in one year of plain Ubuntu usage :)',
this line is really good to know. If this is true, I guess after some
initial learning I would step towards Gentoo, I bet. But since Gentoo
was not in top 5 at distrowatch.org so that also (earlier) made me
thought that Ubuntu or openSUSE are more matured Linux distributions
but I forgot that the rating I saw was of popularity and not of more
advanced or the one giving more learning curvature.

Thanks.

Re: [gentoo-user] can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse

[Indi]

On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 03:40:02PM +0100, Pandu Poluan wrote:
>    On Dec 10, 2011 8:50 PM, "LinuxIsOne" <[1]linuxisone@gmail.com> wrote:
>    >
> 
>    ----- >8 snip
> 
> >
> > I have come to conclusion that almost all Linux work almost in the
> > same way since they have the same kernel, however, this is what I
> > think.
> 
>    I don't mean to scare you, but most Linux distros work differently.
> 
>    First, there might be differences in how they install a package.
>    There's RPM, apt, pacman, portage, and others.
> 
>    Second, there are differences in the "init" system. Gentoo users
>    OpenRC, Ubuntu uses upstart, and others use SysVinit, systemd, and so
>    on.
> 
>    And even you can't guarantee that the kernels are the same. Many
>    distros introduce their own distro-specific patches to the vanilla
>    kernel. With Gentoo, it's even more complicated, as most experienced
>    Gentooroids will configure and compile their own kernels.
> 
>    (The last paragraph, however, is the reason why Gentoo is so secure:
>    attackers can't be sure that the vuln they're targeting is located at
>    the right spot, *if* the vuln exists at all. Throw in hardened patches
>    like GrSecurity, PAX, and SELinux... well, you get the idea.)

Probably he doesn't; one has to learn a bit before any of this will
make sense to them. Imagine having this converstaion with your
great-aunt Agnes... ;)

> 
>    ((No wonder NASDAQ uses Gentoo for its infrastructure))
> 

Indeed.

-- 
♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ 

Re: [gentoo-user] can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse

[James Broadhead]

On 12 December 2011 23:52, Indi <thebeelzebubtrigger@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 03:40:02PM +0100, Pandu Poluan wrote:
>>    On Dec 10, 2011 8:50 PM, "LinuxIsOne" <[1]linuxisone@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>    ((No wonder NASDAQ uses Gentoo for its infrastructure))
>>
>
> Indeed

What a bunch of ricers :P

Re: [gentoo-user] can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse

[Indi]

On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 01:10:02AM +0100, James Broadhead wrote:
> On 12 December 2011 23:52, Indi <thebeelzebubtrigger@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 03:40:02PM +0100, Pandu Poluan wrote:
> >>    On Dec 10, 2011 8:50 PM, "LinuxIsOne" <[1]linuxisone@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>    ((No wonder NASDAQ uses Gentoo for its infrastructure))
> >>
> >
> > Indeed
> 
> What a bunch of ricers :P

I LOL'd. :)

-- 
caveat utilitor
♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ 

Re: [gentoo-user] can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse

[Pandu Poluan]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 787 bytes --]

On Dec 13, 2011 7:09 AM, "James Broadhead" <jamesbroadhead@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 12 December 2011 23:52, Indi <thebeelzebubtrigger@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 03:40:02PM +0100, Pandu Poluan wrote:
> >>    On Dec 10, 2011 8:50 PM, "LinuxIsOne" <[1]linuxisone@gmail.com>
wrote:
> >>
> >>    ((No wonder NASDAQ uses Gentoo for its infrastructure))
> >>
> >
> > Indeed
>
> What a bunch of ricers :P
>

I'm sure they are. In the interview [1], Lameter said that <quote> NASDAQ
uses a modified version of the Gentoo Linux distribution. </quote>

"modified version"? That practically screams "ricers!" to me :-D

[1]
http://m.itworld.com/open-source/193823/how-linux-mastered-wall-street?mm_ref=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.gossamer-threads.com%2Flists%2Fgentoo%2Fuser%2F236472

Rgds,

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1348 bytes --]