From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-131428-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>) id 1RTMXW-0000pK-Ud for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 23:47:43 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 456D021C066; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 23:47:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bw0-f53.google.com (mail-bw0-f53.google.com [209.85.214.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 064DD21C040 for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 23:46:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkaq10 with SMTP id q10so2668253bka.40 for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 15:46:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=+F+JYMP3SRKrXI1+mCVPZj2wfAGjr8CHKSmR6EvushY=; b=xfZSkowXgvL7sKH0e/EGU5xLPKRkAuSkSgDPoKmDfkrMqSMx2l/+7ZjH5vyOA65eKQ T0Mr5/mpO7npkv5QhpOklCskVtBTrP81aMM0hTwDxGDs78C5FkKjeD/hfPHZqyqE3epS sveit7QUwawE0y2TFxYTm2jnxe/evsSdGpYkw= Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.13.78 with SMTP id b14mr12300844bka.23.1322091961133; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 15:46:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.114.75 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 15:45:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.114.75 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 15:45:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4ECD7653.2050304@xunil.at> References: <20111112005129.003a54d3@digimed.co.uk> <CAG1KTJfU3hbGF-CAJnzsc4EPBwkhN=oEZX1-yEtTya1+vVr0+g@mail.gmail.com> <20111113115637.3766e813@digimed.co.uk> <4EC2FB10.6040106@xunil.at> <20111116002014.70c4fad4@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> <4EC388D7.6040907@xunil.at> <20111116100933.16d6c90f@digimed.co.uk> <4EC39A5D.2090801@xunil.at> <20111116112510.500a7f06@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> <4EC3A7C0.7010404@xunil.at> <ja0kgh$de8$1@dough.gmane.org> <4EC3DAE1.1050006@xunil.at> <ja0u23$r0r$1@dough.gmane.org> <20111116192327.5499e87b@digimed.co.uk> <4EC42C24.1090007@xunil.at> <20111117012727.050497db@digimed.co.uk> <4EC4E59D.4050407@xunil.at> <4EC5870B.4000301@xunil.at> <20111118000448.315087f7@digimed.co.uk> <4EC62982.1080709@xunil.at> <4ECA0F9A.4030509@xunil.at> <4ECA521E.4000500@xunil.at> <4ECD2583.2000709@xunil.at> <CA+czFiBfHTEdgbsV_VzDLMJBDCF3zKSiW+2bKi0EucNG4irOtg@mail.gmail.com> <4ECD4009.7030307@xunil.at> <CA+czFiBEyFvTJwwP7Wj2AesZ0=5OaNu=pmT2+Lg-QzGhJpSFiw@mail.gmail.com> <4ECD7653.2050304@xunil.at> Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 18:45:59 -0500 Message-ID: <CA+czFiB+DAL=c6sAbVie5Jf8wGPfrd4RqQpvvR9vkoJHq6Qxqw@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: Another hardware thread From: Michael Mol <mikemol@gmail.com> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00151750e2acb42c8204b26f8542 X-Archives-Salt: f6a565db-15fb-459c-8e8f-b5ad6209f98c X-Archives-Hash: 4509ad69285c174b9f3c193e30bc828c --00151750e2acb42c8204b26f8542 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 DVI-I outputs may be converted to VGA with a simple adapter; the connector at the computer contains both analog and digital signaling. ZZ On Nov 23, 2011 5:42 PM, "Stefan G. Weichinger" <lists@xunil.at> wrote: > Am 2011-11-23 20:02, schrieb Michael Mol: > > > ISTR gcc's i7 optimizations giving someone in here trouble within the > > last couple weeks. As I recall, they dropped back to march and > mtune=core2. > > I don't expect wonders from the new compiler and its options. For now I > am more constrained by the fact that the nvidia-card in that new and > shiny box only has one DVI-output, so I can't attach both of my > VGA-only-TFTs. > > This is more of a performance issue to me than some %s gained by > gcc-issues, I assume. > > Gotta go and buy another graphics card ... > > Thanks anyway for sharing, I will keep the new gcc and maybe compile > single pkgs for testing. > > Stefan > > > > --00151750e2acb42c8204b26f8542 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <p>DVI-I outputs may be converted to VGA with a simple adapter; the connect= or at the computer contains both analog and digital signaling.</p> <p>ZZ</p> <div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Nov 23, 2011 5:42 PM, "Stefan G. Weichin= ger" <<a href=3D"mailto:lists@xunil.at">lists@xunil.at</a>> wrot= e:<br type=3D"attribution"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margi= n:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> Am 2011-11-23 20:02, schrieb Michael Mol:<br> <br> > ISTR gcc's i7 optimizations giving someone in here trouble within = the<br> > last couple weeks. As I recall, they dropped back to march and mtune= =3Dcore2.<br> <br> I don't expect wonders from the new compiler and its options. For now I= <br> am more constrained by the fact that the nvidia-card in that new and<br> shiny box only has one DVI-output, so I can't attach both of my<br> VGA-only-TFTs.<br> <br> This is more of a performance issue to me than some %s gained by<br> gcc-issues, I assume.<br> <br> Gotta go and buy another graphics card ...<br> <br> Thanks anyway for sharing, I will keep the new gcc and maybe compile<br> single pkgs for testing.<br> <br> Stefan<br> <br> <br> <br> </blockquote></div> --00151750e2acb42c8204b26f8542--