From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-131428-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1RTMXW-0000pK-Ud
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 23:47:43 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 456D021C066;
Wed, 23 Nov 2011 23:47:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-bw0-f53.google.com (mail-bw0-f53.google.com [209.85.214.53])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 064DD21C040
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 23:46:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by bkaq10 with SMTP id q10so2668253bka.40
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 15:46:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type;
bh=+F+JYMP3SRKrXI1+mCVPZj2wfAGjr8CHKSmR6EvushY=;
b=xfZSkowXgvL7sKH0e/EGU5xLPKRkAuSkSgDPoKmDfkrMqSMx2l/+7ZjH5vyOA65eKQ
T0Mr5/mpO7npkv5QhpOklCskVtBTrP81aMM0hTwDxGDs78C5FkKjeD/hfPHZqyqE3epS
sveit7QUwawE0y2TFxYTm2jnxe/evsSdGpYkw=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.13.78 with SMTP id b14mr12300844bka.23.1322091961133; Wed,
23 Nov 2011 15:46:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.204.114.75 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 15:45:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.204.114.75 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 15:45:59 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4ECD7653.2050304@xunil.at>
References: <20111112005129.003a54d3@digimed.co.uk>
<CAG1KTJfU3hbGF-CAJnzsc4EPBwkhN=oEZX1-yEtTya1+vVr0+g@mail.gmail.com>
<20111113115637.3766e813@digimed.co.uk>
<4EC2FB10.6040106@xunil.at>
<20111116002014.70c4fad4@zaphod.digimed.co.uk>
<4EC388D7.6040907@xunil.at>
<20111116100933.16d6c90f@digimed.co.uk>
<4EC39A5D.2090801@xunil.at>
<20111116112510.500a7f06@zaphod.digimed.co.uk>
<4EC3A7C0.7010404@xunil.at>
<ja0kgh$de8$1@dough.gmane.org>
<4EC3DAE1.1050006@xunil.at>
<ja0u23$r0r$1@dough.gmane.org>
<20111116192327.5499e87b@digimed.co.uk>
<4EC42C24.1090007@xunil.at>
<20111117012727.050497db@digimed.co.uk>
<4EC4E59D.4050407@xunil.at>
<4EC5870B.4000301@xunil.at>
<20111118000448.315087f7@digimed.co.uk>
<4EC62982.1080709@xunil.at>
<4ECA0F9A.4030509@xunil.at>
<4ECA521E.4000500@xunil.at>
<4ECD2583.2000709@xunil.at>
<CA+czFiBfHTEdgbsV_VzDLMJBDCF3zKSiW+2bKi0EucNG4irOtg@mail.gmail.com>
<4ECD4009.7030307@xunil.at>
<CA+czFiBEyFvTJwwP7Wj2AesZ0=5OaNu=pmT2+Lg-QzGhJpSFiw@mail.gmail.com>
<4ECD7653.2050304@xunil.at>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 18:45:59 -0500
Message-ID: <CA+czFiB+DAL=c6sAbVie5Jf8wGPfrd4RqQpvvR9vkoJHq6Qxqw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: Another hardware thread
From: Michael Mol <mikemol@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00151750e2acb42c8204b26f8542
X-Archives-Salt: f6a565db-15fb-459c-8e8f-b5ad6209f98c
X-Archives-Hash: 4509ad69285c174b9f3c193e30bc828c
--00151750e2acb42c8204b26f8542
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
DVI-I outputs may be converted to VGA with a simple adapter; the connector
at the computer contains both analog and digital signaling.
ZZ
On Nov 23, 2011 5:42 PM, "Stefan G. Weichinger" <lists@xunil.at> wrote:
> Am 2011-11-23 20:02, schrieb Michael Mol:
>
> > ISTR gcc's i7 optimizations giving someone in here trouble within the
> > last couple weeks. As I recall, they dropped back to march and
> mtune=core2.
>
> I don't expect wonders from the new compiler and its options. For now I
> am more constrained by the fact that the nvidia-card in that new and
> shiny box only has one DVI-output, so I can't attach both of my
> VGA-only-TFTs.
>
> This is more of a performance issue to me than some %s gained by
> gcc-issues, I assume.
>
> Gotta go and buy another graphics card ...
>
> Thanks anyway for sharing, I will keep the new gcc and maybe compile
> single pkgs for testing.
>
> Stefan
>
>
>
>
--00151750e2acb42c8204b26f8542
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<p>DVI-I outputs may be converted to VGA with a simple adapter; the connect=
or at the computer contains both analog and digital signaling.</p>
<p>ZZ</p>
<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Nov 23, 2011 5:42 PM, "Stefan G. Weichin=
ger" <<a href=3D"mailto:lists@xunil.at">lists@xunil.at</a>> wrot=
e:<br type=3D"attribution"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margi=
n:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Am 2011-11-23 20:02, schrieb Michael Mol:<br>
<br>
> ISTR gcc's i7 optimizations giving someone in here trouble within =
the<br>
> last couple weeks. As I recall, they dropped back to march and mtune=
=3Dcore2.<br>
<br>
I don't expect wonders from the new compiler and its options. For now I=
<br>
am more constrained by the fact that the nvidia-card in that new and<br>
shiny box only has one DVI-output, so I can't attach both of my<br>
VGA-only-TFTs.<br>
<br>
This is more of a performance issue to me than some %s gained by<br>
gcc-issues, I assume.<br>
<br>
Gotta go and buy another graphics card ...<br>
<br>
Thanks anyway for sharing, I will keep the new gcc and maybe compile<br>
single pkgs for testing.<br>
<br>
Stefan<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div>
--00151750e2acb42c8204b26f8542--