From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QzYCb-0003Lr-OQ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 18:10:53 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 26F1B21C108; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 18:10:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bw0-f53.google.com (mail-bw0-f53.google.com [209.85.214.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74FB5E050E for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 18:09:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkbzs8 with SMTP id zs8so3770458bkb.40 for ; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 11:09:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=RYxfm7uwg9kA4riGyyCU+GU3uWOYRM0Z5SYWxgQjVx0=; b=jpBU40VSphvz/J5nvHtrjlNGEsCYTrnACvRrkFkcZLBQOqN/Z2fjgSwI3TLIoWkaLj aoNFK+xpwyzspNMAKHQ3AwojadsolBmon8riUOlESGSsbkpbYkY69r1isZmotSBYyRpV fVluHAx92gSEDc/QB1hXMDn8aWYYLHqgiUQZg= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.146.151 with SMTP id h23mr799747bkv.156.1314986979592; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 11:09:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.134.153 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 11:09:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.134.153 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 11:09:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 14:09:39 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: 10 G eth (10000) on Gentoo From: Michael Mol To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00151747bb10cd88e404abf9434b X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 933628de4e54ee8133a0a440714b8360 --00151747bb10cd88e404abf9434b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Honestly, I'd just test. There are so many factors that the only way to know the appropriate choice is to try... On Sep 2, 2011 11:35 AM, "James" wrote: > Adam Carter gmail.com> writes: > > >> Looks like intel made multiqueue available in Nov. 2010. You can set >> up to 16 queues. >> http://downloadmirror.intel.com/14687/eng/README.txt > > > Thanks guys, for the discussion. Kinda reminds me back in > in the day of "jumbo frames" and the arguments as to if/when > jumbo frame support helps in routing..... > > Any anecdotal comments as to how poor-bad 10 G eth crawls/fails > on a Microsoft server, would give me ammo to shoot down > the opposition... > > > James > > > > > --00151747bb10cd88e404abf9434b Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Honestly, I'd just test. There are so many factors that the only way= to know the appropriate choice is to try...

On Sep 2, 2011 11:35 AM, "James" <<= a href=3D"mailto:wireless@tampabay.rr.com">wireless@tampabay.rr.com>= wrote:
> Adam Carter <adamcarter3 <at>= gmail.com> writes:
>
>
>> Looks like intel made multiqueue available in No= v. 2010. You can set
>> up to 16 queues.
>> http://downloadmirror.i= ntel.com/14687/eng/README.txt
>
>
> Thanks guys, for the discussion. Kinda reminds me ba= ck in
> in the day of "jumbo frames" and the arguments as t= o if/when
> jumbo frame support helps in routing.....
>
> Any anecdotal comments as to how poor-bad 10 G eth crawls/fails
>= ; on a Microsoft server, would give me ammo to shoot down
> the oppos= ition...
>
>
> James
>
>
>
>
>
--00151747bb10cd88e404abf9434b--