From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SNRyk-0006DP-PW for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 16:55:39 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1AA81E07A7; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 16:55:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bk0-f53.google.com (mail-bk0-f53.google.com [209.85.214.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B925E0746 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 16:53:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkcjk13 with SMTP id jk13so884585bkc.40 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 09:53:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=FW6J3yywyLpnz1FEsOo13VUY188Ez5CRg+bz0HctgP0=; b=fN2lYe+dHzsDU+Z3ZgfYkFNkrQ9E07j4yMjvMfWbKeIM0S/uUSUP8V+xGvUklN3f1C 85qYNJZ8TksNy6ROcwGf5gb1u8vD4nXWQ1PTzQkvC57IzjMawoPrpanMoIrqyvx0eYS7 VuAotuVTli8keYcmAhrVkg61qeVTgJP71SyhjMbgiHSOKks7cdVlFfNZnTHW+8ejMKXw cFn7jvJKsfhexZA7g8vAAsnHuG+greV32v2jVH0mf2TqifzjuzVyNGDBqY+AHDnXMdsF EZbSeIEmcgbeKe+1A4Pqg3+R57rkgeMrcWMdSXwI5LnIlXCQ85lHrXWxzAm8UQ6LbWyR TNtQ== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.152.137 with SMTP id g9mr1183891bkw.95.1335459209111; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 09:53:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.153.213 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 09:53:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 12:53:28 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Just a heads-up, I think =sys-libs/glibc-2.14.1-r3 is a stinker. From: Michael Mol To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: 97aab9bf-16e6-4f09-801d-bea93704812b X-Archives-Hash: c1ad5cf5f8fe361d266a1f11f90ee4c0 On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Mark Knecht wrote: > On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 7:41 AM, Michael Mol wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Qian Qiao wrote: >>> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 19:40, Michael Mol wrote: >>>> >>>> MAKEOPTS="-j1" didn't fix it. Off to find another solution. >>>> -- >>>> :wq >>>> >>> >>> Does sound like it's just you. I've been running with MAKEOPTS="-j13" >>> and everything compiled and ran just fine. >> >> Checking to see if it's a distcc problem, now. If it is, it'll only be >> the third time I've ever had issues from distcc, and the first time a >> distcc issue resulted in a successful build of a package that broke >> things. >> >> -- >> :wq >> > > Late to the party as I've been travelling. Running glibc-2.14.1-r3 > here with no problems. > > For the i7 i980x here's my make.conf stuff > > FEATURES="buildpkg" > > EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--with-bdeps=y --jobs=5" > MAKEOPTS="-j13 -l8" > PORTAGE_NICENESS=5 > PORTAGE_IONICE_COMMAND="ionice -c 3 -p \${PID}" > > This machine is mostly stable. For comparison, here's the current setup on my Phenom 9650: #expanded form of -march=native. Nothing special here. Noting this here because people keep freaking out when they see it in-line. SYS_CFLAGS_MARCH_NATIVE_EXP="-march=amdfam10 -mcx16 -msahf -mpopcnt --param l1-cache-size=64 --param l1-cache-line-size=64 --param l2-cache-size=512 -mtune=amdfam10" CFLAGS="${SYS_CFLAGS_MARCH_NATIVE_EXP} -O2 -pipe -ggdb3" CXXFLAGS="${CFLAGS}" FEATURES="splitdebug" MAKEOPTS="--jobs --load=5" EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--jobs --load-average=6 --verbose --tree --with-bdeps=y --keep-going" -- :wq