From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RqQ3G-0005XG-Su for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:11:47 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2870DE08BF; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:11:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bk0-f53.google.com (mail-bk0-f53.google.com [209.85.214.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6637EE085D for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:10:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkbzt19 with SMTP id zt19so516514bkb.40 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 06:10:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=xY5UyusofKm4NBXY3sfO6jyJ6oq3C93deKXi4vfYEJA=; b=Z5LHfZTzprwQjRvw/KQyRcFmG+tOOLXGVZJDjgWd76E3j9QmTS6xMgR0/JtHA9uji0 w6JD3OCInN+JN3geckQBjX2ei7dkSNqwIJh3zuxZuuWNQlFQyuuqWp6QlCZYYCVV4YsZ gBYTPwyfy1KvnGUDG3s6P5hamSYP5JdmC0R4s= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.130.150 with SMTP id t22mr1112160bks.1.1327587030489; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 06:10:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.177.18 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 06:10:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4F215DA5.4010003@hadt.biz> References: <4F20FDB1.1030100@gmail.com> <201201261007.53041.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> <20120126113314.28857d24@digimed.co.uk> <201201261257.00153.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> <20120126135046.196f8c4b@digimed.co.uk> <4F215DA5.4010003@hadt.biz> Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:10:30 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Google privacy changes From: Michael Mol To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: 2a6a5261-ad16-4237-9f12-efb3c577c7d8 X-Archives-Hash: 16e6e37bb2745752cbbe1a483119044d On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 9:05 AM, Michael Hampicke wrote: >> There is actually a huge amount of information available, giving a high >> level of pseudo-uniqueness. There was a web site that showed you how >> much it could glean from even an anonymous session, but I can't remember >> where is was. Somewhere like the EFF. > > I guess you mean https://panopticlick.eff.org/ > My results from work: Your browser fingerprint appears to be unique among the 1,939,102 tested so far. Currently, we estimate that your browser has a fingerprint that conveys at least 20.89 bits of identifying information. -- :wq