From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1R0vbS-00021p-8o for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 06 Sep 2011 13:22:14 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8D59321C0F2; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 13:21:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bw0-f53.google.com (mail-bw0-f53.google.com [209.85.214.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B98621C0BC for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 13:20:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkbzs8 with SMTP id zs8so7300431bkb.40 for ; Tue, 06 Sep 2011 06:20:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=voLkV4gtoXjcwFymDrOtaJqIw2yJ+5QoXhYcbqZFVzQ=; b=wWSff0owqo0jUToolwZQKghaH0tC3pJHuNBkEsOwQqcFX+e2Aq9nvAY8zaH+LYRBfG 0XOwlj61NQVQjhaz+/WknQOdafQQ9ocEoSWMY/pnLPs6xYT0xXah9U7HaPb07r13G43S 4m/A71xB6pH75gIGp5IZ0GrU5mjBS3gDxqK8I= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.4.138 with SMTP id 10mr2922791bkr.374.1315315245268; Tue, 06 Sep 2011 06:20:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.134.153 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 06:20:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <9B39665D-9010-41DC-B5C3-A259E741F498@stellar.eclipse.co.uk> References: <87ehzuiu1y.fsf@newton.gmurray.org.uk> <4E65405E.8020809@wonkology.org> <20110906015104.GB2510@acm.acm> <20110906111208.393cc39d@weird.wonkology.org> <9B39665D-9010-41DC-B5C3-A259E741F498@stellar.eclipse.co.uk> Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 09:20:45 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] What is up with the libreoffice ebuild? From: Michael Mol To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: cdf6936213f0eea541a8856652a309c8 On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 7:25 AM, Stroller w= rote: > > On 6 September 2011, at 10:12, Alex Schuster wrote: >> ... >>> Just to make things clear, I utterly detest cups, with its arrogance, >>> its wierd, non-standard, and its non-text-based configuration. =C2=A0Su= rely >>> I'm not going to be faced by the choice of abandoning libreoffice or >>> using cups? >> >> ... >> I never liked CUPS, but then, at least there is some interface >> to configure its options. I don't do much printing anyway, so I can live >> with that. Well, seems I have to. > > There's something about the *idea* of CUPS that I think I disliked at one= time. > > Isn't CUPS really bug and bloaty and horrible? > It has it's own web-interface, which one doesn't seem able to disable - w= hy can't I just configure text files? The web interface is on port 631, the port for the Internet Printing Protocol--which operates using HTTP (or something sufficiently like it that you can tell Windows to find a printer at http://yourhostname:631/printer_queue_name) as a baseline. That's why it has a 'web' interface--the IPP folks looked at HTTP, saw that it did much of what they needed, and built on top of it. For giggles...read the HTTP RFC and compare request types like 'PUT' vs 'POST'. HTTP is a *monster* of a protocol. --=20 :wq