From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RV7K2-0003hg-8l for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 19:57:02 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0687021C268; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 19:56:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bw0-f53.google.com (mail-bw0-f53.google.com [209.85.214.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12ED021C064 for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 19:55:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkaq10 with SMTP id q10so10572515bka.40 for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 11:55:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=XoMYoacs5R3dq/TgdD7UFF5h72PjhDzEJtmaz5rnbRg=; b=h+ax1AmJYNauWFWdbLuiFVssGDrbsjh2llIoeFX9WltIIo3cpeoSH7ga+2JrMQBg1d nHHimFWaG/eTx2hZTpBmiErhVrRu+XgsnyZ5Xv+XAxEEvQaskCH4FkY1aeXzogn/8NZU MgrBj9mUPCMV+qrpcXm3huePu3zKV+qwo0NL0= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.13.68 with SMTP id b4mr46406758bka.32.1322510115116; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 11:55:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.14.7 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 11:55:15 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4ED3E30C.8060302@binarywings.net> References: <4ED3D954.8040904@binarywings.net> <4ED3E30C.8060302@binarywings.net> Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 14:55:15 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Devs and rice flags (Was: Re: [gentoo-user] emerge -j, make -j and make -l ) From: Michael Mol To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: f99687c8-d0c9-442d-a4da-2329f29520fb X-Archives-Hash: 42812fdea99775a75610382f9f60751b On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Florian Philipp wrote: > Am 28.11.2011 20:14, schrieb Michael Mol: >> Upstream devs might take issue with them, but I'm still not sure they >> should affect bug reports of build-time failures. I would *hope* >> upstream gcc is doing tests on its own build tools compiled with its >> graphite optimizations. I don't know about make and autotools, though. >> > > Agreed. Even if upstream for failing package doesn't want to handle it, > you can still redirect it to the gcc folks. Even a bug report flagged > WONTFIX or INVALID is helpful for the next user who stumbles upon weird > compile issues. I'd love to see what CSmith is making of graphite. http://embed.cs.utah.edu/csmith/ -- :wq