From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-138839-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1Sb2FV-0006RQ-PC
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 04:17:06 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 56B13E079D;
Sun, 3 Jun 2012 04:16:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-lb0-f181.google.com (mail-lb0-f181.google.com [209.85.217.181])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6288CE045E
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 3 Jun 2012 04:15:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by lbbgk8 with SMTP id gk8so2718709lbb.40
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 02 Jun 2012 21:15:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=DhU6QT9aZVgUYQEf2e3EezYUlgqHYdIcAOsB0bwtFFI=;
b=neS1iaFPaYWU6Kt9BadXu+3wjp1jDUWv6ZH/aM/8JgI0ggDcADln3NHPGMZU4op08t
NjJO8RW0bLHD5Xt33lIINGKye8Eg8UTNG9CceBTJu9uLPJqjuWteloGBwHzww0HCKtJN
qnR+94bpNV5JHo7PTfv6dqXwyEGGNwDtaKORLEM+R6fNAUTyQk7PfcYJnKknvfIDaUSU
/dQwFCXdKW7iuOSsPF9DLJXAnzaKy5n/UiIDsxwrl6/SpNcfjfTc37yO2wsosLtuehRw
QHo8ye249S5cSughP8jfJm2zXX7llasxuNm7Vn1JBAWplylhWPpx1PjS16pyNeCcfzb/
+1Gg==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.112.41.2 with SMTP id b2mr4267066lbl.58.1338696937199; Sat, 02
Jun 2012 21:15:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.130.98 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Jun 2012 21:15:37 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20120603040814.GD12597@madrid>
References: <CA+czFiAsW0+7=4zFjekZjyTPX8kAVLx1g5OSXqDsGBV8Pke6FA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAC=wYCG0Nfh1zth+ZNpD464gM2E+fJ-UXQtA6r+Ex3vOFjAb7g@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+czFiCcVi54B6dgvmzqcR-HMWTFumjXnsvm8bp9wvtOmaRomg@mail.gmail.com>
<CAA2qdGXffqw4gpY1UpKJbM_VghX0XRrEybyXtmc33LksVpUU-w@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+czFiC5ZEo3k0hnFVpL4P6dUeYRB9sX6CRmm4CTAwKP-m_VGA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAA2qdGXHaEA8khehqTbpNrqnJaWAqhbdOq67VQ-2fc2Wceo=Rw@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+czFiAaxkGRY-6dsj_7BRL+xarrxAwr3bR3C4eNeRqCx0fv=A@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+czFiCuQPJVWo7LpnfaD6zr4WAaOnTGL9TCQeYmnvYhk6tZrQ@mail.gmail.com>
<20120603033410.GC12597@madrid>
<CA+czFiB3nvcUTUh7-LRapQ0v_OHWTnL=S=AY5k__XYNXvvO0Cw@mail.gmail.com>
<20120603040814.GD12597@madrid>
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2012 00:15:37 -0400
Message-ID: <CA+czFiA78pOCY_Fu3C-2XFpN3cS86RK62A4S0Rhpv8ve4hPchQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Just a heads-up, I think =sys-libs/glibc-2.14.1-r3
is a stinker.
From: Michael Mol <mikemol@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: 1d462a6e-d625-405b-a824-933965620bd1
X-Archives-Hash: 8640d548a92224b1a5e5614e2877c584
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 12:08 AM, Dmitry Goncharov
<dgoncharov@users.sf.net> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 11:56:01PM -0400, Michael Mol wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Dmitry Goncharov
>> <dgoncharov@users.sf.net> wrote:
>> > On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 10:52:12PM -0400, Michael Mol wrote:
>> >> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Michael Mol <mikemol@gmail.com> wro=
te:
>> >> Wow. Just wow. This is incredible.
>> >>
>> >> This is repeatable for me.
>> >>
>> > <snip>
>> >> =C2=A0* The problem occurred while executing the ebuild file named
>> >> =C2=A0* 'glibc-2.14.1-r3.ebuild' located in the '/var/db/pkg/sys-
>> >>
>> > <snip>
>> >> CFLAGS=3D"-O2 -pipe -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3D2 -march=3Dcore2 -mcx16 -msah=
f
>> >> --param l1-cache-size=3D32 --param l1-cache-line-size=3D64 --param
>> >> l2-cache-size=3D4096 -mtune=3Dcore2 -ggdb3"
>> >> CXXFLAGS=3D"${CFLAGS}"
>> >
>> > Can you upgrage to glibc-2.15?
>>
>> Sure. It's going to be another full reinstall.
>>
>> > Can you tweak you gcc flags to something more conventional and see if =
the
>> > problem persists?
>>
>> Those CFLAGS should be equivalent to:
>> CFLAGS=3D"-O2 -pipe -ggdb3 --march=3Dnative".
>>
>> But I'll try making it just -O2 -pipe --march=3Dnative.
>>
>> > If you are interested in submitting a patch to the upstream then you c=
an build
>> > the glibc test suite with your gcc flags and check if the tests pass.
>>
>> If it gets things fixed. I have two machines which have been offline
>> for almost two months from this.
>>
>> --
>> :wq
>>
> Also, which gcc are you using? Can you try a different version?
It updated gcc immediately before glibc, IIRC, so I expect it's newest
stable. Kaylee is offline until I do a new reinstall again, but it
looks like latest stable in portage is 4.5.3-r2.
--=20
:wq