From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Sb2FV-0006RQ-PC for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 04:17:06 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 56B13E079D; Sun, 3 Jun 2012 04:16:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lb0-f181.google.com (mail-lb0-f181.google.com [209.85.217.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6288CE045E for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2012 04:15:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lbbgk8 with SMTP id gk8so2718709lbb.40 for ; Sat, 02 Jun 2012 21:15:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=DhU6QT9aZVgUYQEf2e3EezYUlgqHYdIcAOsB0bwtFFI=; b=neS1iaFPaYWU6Kt9BadXu+3wjp1jDUWv6ZH/aM/8JgI0ggDcADln3NHPGMZU4op08t NjJO8RW0bLHD5Xt33lIINGKye8Eg8UTNG9CceBTJu9uLPJqjuWteloGBwHzww0HCKtJN qnR+94bpNV5JHo7PTfv6dqXwyEGGNwDtaKORLEM+R6fNAUTyQk7PfcYJnKknvfIDaUSU /dQwFCXdKW7iuOSsPF9DLJXAnzaKy5n/UiIDsxwrl6/SpNcfjfTc37yO2wsosLtuehRw QHo8ye249S5cSughP8jfJm2zXX7llasxuNm7Vn1JBAWplylhWPpx1PjS16pyNeCcfzb/ +1Gg== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.41.2 with SMTP id b2mr4267066lbl.58.1338696937199; Sat, 02 Jun 2012 21:15:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.130.98 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Jun 2012 21:15:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120603040814.GD12597@madrid> References: <20120603033410.GC12597@madrid> <20120603040814.GD12597@madrid> Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2012 00:15:37 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Just a heads-up, I think =sys-libs/glibc-2.14.1-r3 is a stinker. From: Michael Mol To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 1d462a6e-d625-405b-a824-933965620bd1 X-Archives-Hash: 8640d548a92224b1a5e5614e2877c584 On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 12:08 AM, Dmitry Goncharov wrote: > On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 11:56:01PM -0400, Michael Mol wrote: >> On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Dmitry Goncharov >> wrote: >> > On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 10:52:12PM -0400, Michael Mol wrote: >> >> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Michael Mol wro= te: >> >> Wow. Just wow. This is incredible. >> >> >> >> This is repeatable for me. >> >> >> > >> >> =C2=A0* The problem occurred while executing the ebuild file named >> >> =C2=A0* 'glibc-2.14.1-r3.ebuild' located in the '/var/db/pkg/sys- >> >> >> > >> >> CFLAGS=3D"-O2 -pipe -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3D2 -march=3Dcore2 -mcx16 -msah= f >> >> --param l1-cache-size=3D32 --param l1-cache-line-size=3D64 --param >> >> l2-cache-size=3D4096 -mtune=3Dcore2 -ggdb3" >> >> CXXFLAGS=3D"${CFLAGS}" >> > >> > Can you upgrage to glibc-2.15? >> >> Sure. It's going to be another full reinstall. >> >> > Can you tweak you gcc flags to something more conventional and see if = the >> > problem persists? >> >> Those CFLAGS should be equivalent to: >> CFLAGS=3D"-O2 -pipe -ggdb3 --march=3Dnative". >> >> But I'll try making it just -O2 -pipe --march=3Dnative. >> >> > If you are interested in submitting a patch to the upstream then you c= an build >> > the glibc test suite with your gcc flags and check if the tests pass. >> >> If it gets things fixed. I have two machines which have been offline >> for almost two months from this. >> >> -- >> :wq >> > Also, which gcc are you using? Can you try a different version? It updated gcc immediately before glibc, IIRC, so I expect it's newest stable. Kaylee is offline until I do a new reinstall again, but it looks like latest stable in portage is 4.5.3-r2. --=20 :wq