From: Michael Mol <mikemol@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] ~gcc-4.7.0
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 08:58:52 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+czFiA-qO8DKiQmjj-=PGmj_wo4+sx9tZWbz1Ava6fZ+QJ=jA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMgqO2xMqKf30KK7fjOLYy1MBiTj1CXXhkpW96QPjm-wa7M6Ow@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 4:30 AM, microcai <microcai@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> 2012/5/29 Michael Mol <mikemol@gmail.com>
[snip]
>> I'm mostly looking forward to Bulldozer support and RDRAND.
>>
>
> LOL I thought no one buys it
The average decent-quality AMD-supporting motherboard that supports
the level of contemporary features I want costs 100-130 USD, and I
generally go for a CPU in the range of $150-$180. So that's a total
ticket price of about $250-$310 USD. I've been using AMD machines in
my home for five or six years, now; generally, when one box gets
upgraded, parts of it (especially the CPU) get put into a different
box to upgrade that. That hasn't been possible on Intel.
An Intel-supporting motherboard with the level of contemporary
features I want becomes my first hurdle. Just for the base set of
features I'd want (6 current-speed SATA ports, max "supported" RAM of
32GB, LGA1155), I'm looking at $230 and up. For a processor?
$200-$320. And I'd want an i7, not an i5, so we're talking upper
range.
Yes, the early Bulldozers don't measure up to the Phenom II, but
amdfam10 is going away, and Bulldozer will get past that mark. Rather
similar how Intel's early NetBurst cores didn't manage to beat Pentium
IIIs, but later ones did. (Yeah, NetBurst eventually bit the dust,
and for good reason. I have to think, though, that a lot of what Intel
learned with NetBurst went into preparing them for Sandy Bridge's
incredible overclocking range.)
So, yeah, while I'd love a performance-grade Intel desktop box, it's
going to be hard to justify the price ticket. Even if I don't manage
to get an IvyBridge desktop box, I do want to get my hands on an
IvyBridge i3 motherboard; that RDRAND instruction is going to be sweet
in a network gateway machine, and the power consumption deliciously
low.
--
:wq
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-29 13:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-28 20:04 [gentoo-user] ~gcc-4.7.0 Stefan G. Weichinger
2012-05-28 20:54 ` Sascha Cunz
2012-05-28 21:11 ` Stefan G. Weichinger
2012-05-29 2:19 ` Pandu Poluan
2012-05-29 2:26 ` Michael Mol
2012-05-29 8:30 ` microcai
2012-05-29 12:58 ` Michael Mol [this message]
2012-05-29 16:18 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2012-05-29 9:42 ` [gentoo-user] ~gcc-4.7.0 Nikos Chantziaras
2012-05-29 11:35 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2012-05-29 11:58 ` Stefan G. Weichinger
2012-05-29 11:51 ` Stefan G. Weichinger
2012-05-29 10:13 ` [gentoo-user] ~gcc-4.7.0 Andrey Moshbear
2012-05-29 10:26 ` Hinnerk van Bruinehsen
2012-05-29 13:01 ` Adam Carter
2012-05-29 14:11 ` Michael Orlitzky
2012-05-29 11:54 ` [gentoo-user] ~gcc-4.7.0 walt
2012-06-02 0:36 ` walt
2012-06-02 2:37 ` Nilesh Govindrajan
2012-06-02 6:52 ` Hinnerk van Bruinehsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CA+czFiA-qO8DKiQmjj-=PGmj_wo4+sx9tZWbz1Ava6fZ+QJ=jA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=mikemol@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox