From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QDy6e-0000Pi-Vp for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 12:08:05 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2A2941C016; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 12:06:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtpout.karoo.kcom.com (smtpout.karoo.kcom.com [212.50.160.34]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBD891C016 for ; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 12:06:31 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.64,262,1301871600"; d="scan'208";a="763852686" Received: from 213-152-39-90.dsl.eclipse.net.uk (HELO compaq.stroller.uk.eu.org) ([213.152.39.90]) by smtpout.karoo.kcom.com with ESMTP; 24 Apr 2011 13:06:30 +0100 Received: from [192.168.1.101] (unknown [192.168.1.101]) by compaq.stroller.uk.eu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF6CC6C514 for ; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 13:06:11 +0100 (BST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] zlib and WOFF From: Stroller In-Reply-To: <20110424010757.172dc29d@acme7.acmenet> Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2011 13:06:28 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <20110424010757.172dc29d@acme7.acmenet> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 93af0130da4b80066f9eb8590d4a1300 On 24/4/2011, at 5:07am, luis jure wrote: > ... > any idea what's wrong here? who's the culprit? zlib? lilypond? me? I looked at Lilypond myself a week or two ago, and installed their = binary package under OS X. Whilst glancing at their documentation again now the wording I'm finding = is not so strong, I had the impression that Lilypond was a bit finicky = and difficult to compile. Again, I can't immediately find the reference, = but I thought that it was sufficiently demanding in terms of environment = and versioning that they provided a VM for development purposes. I would guess that the fault is simply versioning. I would suggest = filing a bug, but also trying to resolve this though the Lilipond IRC = channel &/or mailing list - Lilipond's developers may well have seen = this before. Stroller.