public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stroller <stroller@stellar.eclipse.co.uk>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Anything better than procmail?
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2010 20:32:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <C2ADCE96-0F5D-4F7B-AB46-1E1EE0AF8CE4@stellar.eclipse.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100612123547.491fdec0@karnak.local>

Hi David,

Your setup looks fairly similar to my own, but I am intrigued by the  
differences.


On 12 Jun 2010, at 12:35, David W Noon wrote:
> ... Dovecot, but quickly replaced by dbmail.

Can I ask you why?

I have found the author of Dovecot to be wonderfully responsive,  
pushing out a fix for a deal-breaker issue for my site within hours of  
me reporting it.

> This allows you to use a sieve script, instead of procmail "recipes".

Can I ask you what the advantage of this is, please?

Looking at the example at <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sieve_(mail_filtering_language) 
 >, the language looks basically very similar to maildrop, and it  
seems to do pretty much the same thing.

The reject syntax seems nice and clear, but if the MX server (for your  
email's domain name) has already accepted the message then it's not  
really much good rejecting it. In fact, doing so is surely frowned  
upon, isn't it?

> Moreover, each user maintains his/her own sieve script.

As certainly would be the case with maildrop, and surely too with  
procmail?

Stroller.




  reply	other threads:[~2010-06-12 20:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <eUoaR-7XR-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
2010-06-12 11:35 ` [gentoo-user] Anything better than procmail? David W Noon
2010-06-12 19:32   ` Stroller [this message]
     [not found] <eUGhs-Yv-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found] ` <eUGhs-Yv-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]   ` <eUGhs-Yv-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]     ` <eUGhs-Yv-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]       ` <eUZWO-4jP-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
2010-06-13 22:37         ` David W Noon
2010-06-14  8:34           ` Neil Bothwick
2010-06-14 11:15           ` Tanstaafl
2010-06-14 13:09             ` Neil Bothwick
2010-06-14 13:51               ` Tanstaafl
     [not found] <eUxea-4y0-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found] ` <eUxea-4y0-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]   ` <eUEIF-73A-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
2010-06-12 21:17     ` David W Noon
2010-06-13 17:53       ` Tanstaafl
2010-06-12  1:55 meino.cramer
2010-06-12  6:52 ` Neil Bothwick
2010-06-12 10:15 ` Peter Schuller
2010-06-12 12:18 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2010-06-12 13:37 ` Enrico Weigelt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=C2ADCE96-0F5D-4F7B-AB46-1E1EE0AF8CE4@stellar.eclipse.co.uk \
    --to=stroller@stellar.eclipse.co.uk \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox