From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Q7Ubu-00073n-4H for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 15:25:35 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 538FE1C15E; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 15:16:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wy0-f181.google.com (mail-wy0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 080191C15E for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 15:16:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyi11 with SMTP id 11so1949025wyi.40 for ; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 08:16:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=ygJSEOgof/BUfQIkJ6pmUvbc51GJloktFrkMP5jkIYw=; b=BvVv6zffXw+umZ5xszegA1z0dpWzXiG9MY1MzijDbVOOBpSsrm5M8g/FmCUH74Vluw pTWc+kCkseKzmr+iBnygmpWSZ4uHtaqp6P/JVSdFEmBiBKRH3lgfR+TciLYSTSFYyM6P enauI6G8Kb2Uv1ldFOZP0cICyhcl+J9bga5ZE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=S8xmz+UEx8//LOnpJPYsmrqVua8B0Ia5syKdqPo2gKivAT5J1pTcyOUkCp5hdp6qGL x5q+APkHOTT7N9m1aIJf/6qhJh1HSYQpFm9vKRXIyhteOn1Uh0WrT0AcZCo7FwzjA1W3 fzQWCh9B/EgNeyl6DYfLtQEMe2RfLNZQJ5rlk= Received: by 10.216.142.165 with SMTP id i37mr1109469wej.106.1302102994170; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 08:16:34 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.182.136 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 08:16:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110406062125.46C252ED2@data.antarean.org> References: <20110406062125.46C252ED2@data.antarean.org> From: Gregory Fontenele Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 12:16:14 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: RAID on new install To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6db29426db35404a0417a0b X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: b33f4f338e1d0f4d5de7bcc9b06a605a --0016e6db29426db35404a0417a0b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 want to leave this list but I can not, can someone erase me from this list? On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 03:21, Joost Roeleveld wrote: > On Monday 04 April 2011 14:16:45 James wrote: > > Mark Shields gmail.com> writes: > > > The last guide recommends using raid0 on some > > > partitions; everytime I use LVM2, I use nothing > > > but raid1 partitions. I'd rather have the full > > > raid1 than partial raid 1 + speed of raid0. > > > > Well Raid 1 only would be keen. > > Even swap as raid 1 ? > > > > There are actually 2 docs that cross > > reference each other. See my post to > > Mark's input... > > > > thx > > James > > On my server, I use RAID-1 for swap as well. Why risk the system crashing > because half the swap dissappears suddenly because of a drive failure? > > There actually is only 1 system that I use regularly with a RAID-0 > partition. > And that machine is only used for virtual machines I use for testing. If > that > one dies, worst that happens is I need to recreate the images. Not a big > loss > for me. > > -- > Joost Roeleveld > > -- Atenciosamente, Gregory Fontenele --0016e6db29426db35404a0417a0b Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable want to lea= ve this list but I can not, can someone erase me from this list?
=
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 03:21, Joost Roelevel= d <joost@antarea= n.org> wrote:
On Monday 04 April 2011 14:16:45 James wrote:
> Mark Shields <laebshade <at> gmail.com> writes:
> > The last guide recommends using raid0 on some
> > partitions; everytime I use LVM2, I use nothing
> > but raid1 partitions. =A0I'd rather have the full
> > raid1 than partial raid 1 + speed of raid0.
>
> Well Raid 1 only would be keen.
> Even swap as raid 1 ?
>
> There are actually 2 docs that cross
> reference each other. See my post to
> Mark's input...
>
> thx
> James

On my server, I use RAID-1 for swap as well. Why risk the system cras= hing
because half the swap dissappears suddenly because of a drive failure?

There actually is only 1 system that I use regularly with a RAID-0 partitio= n.
And that machine is only used for virtual machines I use for testing. If th= at
one dies, worst that happens is I need to recreate the images. Not a big lo= ss
for me.

--
Joost Roeleveld




--
Atenciosamente,<= br>Gregory Fontenele
--0016e6db29426db35404a0417a0b--