From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QNLsG-0003Df-5N for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 20 May 2011 09:20:00 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4D82B1C044; Fri, 20 May 2011 09:18:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from svr-us4.tirtonadi.com (unknown [69.65.43.212]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2631E1C044 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 09:18:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-iw0-f181.google.com ([209.85.214.181]) by svr-us4.tirtonadi.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QNLqf-004CFy-Ld for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 20 May 2011 16:18:21 +0700 Received: by iwn38 with SMTP id 38so3889623iwn.40 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 02:18:17 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.153.195 with SMTP id n3mr2285342icw.523.1305883097931; Fri, 20 May 2011 02:18:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.227.198 with HTTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 02:18:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4DD61C2C.6030604@alyf.net> References: <4DCEE522.6010504@binarywings.net> <4DD61C2C.6030604@alyf.net> Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 16:18:17 +0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Gentoo-based 'filer' / GentooFiler How-To? From: Pandu Poluan To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - svr-us4.tirtonadi.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - lists.gentoo.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - poluan.info X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 4518ce81f198bfbf621e5916ea279f3f On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 14:45, Andrea Conti wrote: > > Hello, > > > Is it true that tgt will replace IET? > > Last time someone asked that question on the IET mailing list the answer > was "no". I can't find the relevant thread right now but I think the > general idea was that IET concentrates on code stability (thus no > inclusion in the kernel sources) and enterprise-oriented features, while > STGT follows kernel development and supports lots of fancy things. > > Also, I think there is/was at least a partial overlap in the developers > behind the two projects. > > > If true, are there any links/howtos/tutorial on using tgt? And tuning it? > > I would start from the project home page, http://stgt.sourceforge.net/ > > HTH, > andrea > Ahh, thanks for the explanation. I'd go the IET route, then; I value stability over features. Rgds, -- Pandu E Poluan ~ IT Optimizer ~ Visit my Blog: http://pepoluan.posterous.com