From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-124945-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1QbZhA-0002mY-Bs
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 14:55:21 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 360421C007;
	Tue, 28 Jun 2011 14:53:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-vx0-f181.google.com (mail-vx0-f181.google.com [209.85.220.181])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0240C1C007
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 14:53:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by vxa40 with SMTP id 40so240688vxa.40
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 07:53:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=4fpwNj0iDCq3OwzNVhXT66WeapSksjZboFP4Dvc+XF8=;
        b=jW8XrpjTltM8xbtMm/otCnrpopEw8xwBOFAW1YuvaRMOQc2wUNKHu+cvt/fuPq1EIn
         nBioBYspDOGDiPR+lbbTHZP8O43HLGeVsxMxl6/KGJZu/hYPGLmtenWV4AfRjNLEtYYG
         ofQpkOVcK3KNdv9Xt49eNZnNx+0qwl32SlPvo=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.25.203 with SMTP id e11mr10647825vdg.201.1309272834468;
 Tue, 28 Jun 2011 07:53:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.113.97 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 07:53:54 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20110628150312.0bdbd8bc@zaphod.digimed.co.uk>
References: <op.vxsbnkd7daowif@melezhik.x>
	<20110628150312.0bdbd8bc@zaphod.digimed.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 16:53:54 +0200
Message-ID: <BANLkTincDrTzHrSZXPPV+VdcApQfD3Ntcw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] portage for chef-0.10.0
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jes=C3=BAs_J=2E_Guerrero_Botella?= <jesus.guerrero.botella@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: 
X-Archives-Hash: e03c34dc6665bcbdf4ec1008612563c3

2011/6/28 Neil Bothwick <neil@digimed.co.uk>:
> On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 16:00:46 +0400, Alexey Melezhik wrote:
>
>> Current chef-client portage is only for version 0.9.12 (according to
>> http://packages.gentoo.org/package/app-admin/chef), while version
>> 0.10.0 of chef was released at May, 02. When portage for chef-client,
>> version 0.10.0 will be ready?
>
> Bugzilla is the place to ask this, in this case at
>
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D369391

Sometimes the problem is that there's not enough dev power, or that
there's no developer interested in maintaining that concrete package.

In any case, submitting an updated ebuild to bugzilla sometimes can
help to speed up the process.


--=20
Jes=C3=BAs Guerrero Botella