From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Q7IHE-0001Qh-AA for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 02:15:24 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 458C11C042; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 02:13:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ww0-f41.google.com (mail-ww0-f41.google.com [74.125.82.41]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED7371C042 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 02:13:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwi18 with SMTP id 18so3516436wwi.4 for ; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 19:13:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=pZNjPUqBtXe2mh6ZgJn2dd+r83di3/DHEW96HyUOrO8=; b=lvQ3E4IGAFiybBiugXdyZ55i1aA1oD8rSseUVsIG+cFsWhIZoS76nTKel8AW+PMVha pJJaGjzPhQqveVFmQinh04b/gKANSSd6ksTUhrn0j4JulUAXVP/yywHFOctLUPU4ZLyW iSES+6aQOKq8gELmGxF+qbh/Nnp+Dnt53wJ6A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=lKa99wYLCc9NZ9kJ8W34AsZujEwlD82FjRQ7HyDDly4x1dC14DkR5UgB+xTZUoKsVu Rl5ZoTRnzhEqwSPLuyK2noQTF0ZCM55aO3DoKPXpTJzGydh7oJ/jdtpeDDkOgO6WWBmD XcaxPRXeylQ14o6o8mbcgwf6Ymg8VUBn2EkI8= Received: by 10.227.12.13 with SMTP id v13mr377148wbv.134.1302055994139; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 19:13:14 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.21.141 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Apr 2011 19:12:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Mark Shields Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 21:12:54 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: RAID on new install To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=002215974a760226e304a036890e X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 0314b693109e5ed4339404a190e6b0d1 --002215974a760226e304a036890e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 9:16 AM, James wrote: > Mark Shields gmail.com> writes: > > > > The last guide recommends using raid0 on some > > partitions; everytime I use LVM2, I use nothing > > but raid1 partitions. I'd rather have the full > > raid1 than partial raid 1 + speed of raid0. > > > Well Raid 1 only would be keen. > Even swap as raid 1 ? > > There are actually 2 docs that cross > reference each other. See my post to > Mark's input... > > thx > James > > > > > > Well, no. I don't use raid 1 with swap; I just use a separate swap partition on each drive. But all the other partitions, I use raid 1. --002215974a760226e304a036890e Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 9:16 AM, James <wireless@tampabay.= rr.com> wrote:
Mark Shields <laebshade <at> gmail.com> writes:


> The last guide recommends using raid0 on some
> partitions; everytime I use LVM2, I use nothing
> but raid1 partitions. =A0I'd rather have the full
> raid1 than partial raid 1 + speed of raid0.


Well Raid 1 only would be keen.
Even swap as raid 1 ?

There are actually 2 docs that cross
reference each other. See my post to
Mark's input...

thx
James





=A0
Well, no. =A0I don't use ra= id 1 with swap; I just use a separate swap partition on each drive. =A0But = all the other partitions, I use raid 1. --002215974a760226e304a036890e--