From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QKLQr-00016n-Fg for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 12 May 2011 02:15:17 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D45FD1C00A; Thu, 12 May 2011 02:13:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ww0-f53.google.com (mail-ww0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88B891C00A for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 02:13:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwj40 with SMTP id 40so1104884wwj.10 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 19:13:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ADvXnMuFOEEdVKnxWJcFv1Lm9cinKloLNMpFEbiE5NM=; b=A4LZGuXV3uYbdy8l8gcTnm3WT8A8NO3Jkx+CdGEN/Xj1yhQtjCn2vCTPi9H29kT9P8 Zvbu+uf3yo+M9JI0TwMEklOmqrb0w8pOQqfvBvpTmq9n1Myu1KTfUfiJu7Iq6Z10bnpX Y8H6mJ4Jw2ATKUZ8tiRd4G1fHFzf4Y7CeDZKY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=VNxGx7v+K/e5Faxqb9k5qqgyY+WcEZ41zQfdr6MUua4nCMsC4jU0ixicyhdPOLfdfo 0Fw8AIMvlExYWb3uMdz/Ls7rrlBGpbIDOFgVe4qWbqcmaw1NKJ1jczlWOJ8fwWMGIHst vBUhjcXpIV8SJqYIMMh7gBDPZVivXy5uULBTU= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.164.199 with SMTP id f7mr1052629wby.70.1305166418598; Wed, 11 May 2011 19:13:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.201.142 with HTTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 19:13:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <201105101653.35456.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> <201105102136.41151.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 19:13:38 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Prevent depclean from removing Python-2.6? From: "Kevin O'Gorman" To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf30025502c0dcd804a30abcc3 X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 15a9f196172d9deaa95ca20d36c229e0 --20cf30025502c0dcd804a30abcc3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Adam Carter wrote: > >>> Apparently so. It seems like it ought to pay attention to eselect. >> >>> If I've explicitly configured my system to use 2.6 instead of 2.7, >> >>> removing 2.6 doesn't seem like a good thing... >> > > Sounds to me like that should be made into a feature request. What does the > list think? If there's support I will log it. > +1 It bit me, and just seems stupid. -- Kevin O'Gorman, PhD --20cf30025502c0dcd804a30abcc3 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Adam Ca= rter <adamcar= ter3@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Apparently so. =C2=A0It seems like it ought to pay attention t= o eselect.
>>> If I've explicitly configured my system to use 2.6 instead= of 2.7,
>>> removing 2.6 doesn't seem like a good thing...

Sounds to me like that should be made into a feature r= equest. What does the list think? If there's support I will log it.

+1=C2=A0 It bit me, and just seems stupid.

--=
Kevin O'Gorman, PhD

--20cf30025502c0dcd804a30abcc3--