From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QKhC4-0000BC-7X for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 13 May 2011 01:29:28 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 66D6E1C00F; Fri, 13 May 2011 01:27:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pw0-f53.google.com (mail-pw0-f53.google.com [209.85.160.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DAD31C00F for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 01:27:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pwj5 with SMTP id 5so1496941pwj.40 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 18:27:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ILA4rF8gZQzxgkfCoD/+yIWxaULCSOhRFIgGVnpI1zA=; b=wrg8iOe/TQwdLH03dukQQmFLy2duKcuvRkG2przNd4rp4T29ywxg2iyp8wo+GGFfvU mcXlFYt+hBjebCkqJr/07iM70dXa9WXG6fkzwwWDqdKmtbojcEK3+VnpdJTBbaL2Gcdc GlU0mINne8eNKyE/kuoNMcjDKbQr5eW7gjqGU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=s5URlmUAx+zdbfAPHlyGo4D/7mb52whrwyWA+HsH7zBPQJX4KA34lA/Mr8jWgjDLrM dvhUGdKiS6HPle7u6aFMLh/VFhbQtgYYyDx7spkK8EWIVhBnXcRN2IzV/rg4cvQUnzjE SpX+FGWy/bD+Pk62mrttfR3aHsrVChIozYrRM= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.4.201 with SMTP id m9mr1309269pbm.177.1305250044468; Thu, 12 May 2011 18:27:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.57.4 with HTTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 18:27:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4DCBE806.3040904@asyr.hopto.org> References: <20110512124315.GA27239@gaurahari> <4DCBE806.3040904@asyr.hopto.org> Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 09:27:24 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Will the next auto-build stage tar ball include OpenRC update? From: =?UTF-8?B?5YiY5YuH5rOw?= To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec520e5213e5df704a31e350c X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: b72d61fd82a0e9ea3bae71b53ae38664 --bcaec520e5213e5df704a31e350c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2011/5/12 Thanasis > on 05/12/2011 03:43 PM Indi wrote the following: > > On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 02:40:02PM +0200, Joost Roeleveld wrote: > >> On Thursday 12 May 2011 17:12:30 dong l wrote: > >>> =E4=B8=AA=E4=BA=BA=E7=BB=8F=E5=8E=86=EF=BC=8Cbaselayout=E7=9A=84=E6= =9B=B4=E6=96=B0=E5=85=B6=E5=AE=9E=E9=83=BD=E4=B8=8D=E6=80=8E=E4=B9=88suffer= ,=E5=91=B5=E5=91=B5=EF=BD=9E > >> > >> huh? > >> > > > > It surely does look cool though, wish I could read and write in such > > a picturesque manner. :) > > > The wonders of UTF8 ... the topic of another thread .... :) > > Can Chinese character be displayed correctly when there is no zh* setting i= n LINGUAS variant? --bcaec520e5213e5df704a31e350c Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

2011/5/12 Thanasis <= ;thanasis@asyr.hopto.org>=
on 05/12/2011 03:43 PM Indi wrote the following:
> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 02:40:02PM +0200, Joost Roel= eveld wrote:
>> On Thursday 12 May 2011 17:12:30 dong l wrote:
>>> =E4=B8=AA=E4=BA=BA=E7=BB=8F=E5=8E=86=EF=BC=8Cbaselayout=E7=9A= =84=E6=9B=B4=E6=96=B0=E5=85=B6=E5=AE=9E=E9=83=BD=E4=B8=8D=E6=80=8E=E4=B9=88= suffer,=E5=91=B5=E5=91=B5=EF=BD=9E
>>
>> huh?
>>
>
> It surely does look cool though, wish I could read and write in such > a picturesque manner. :)
>
The wonders of UTF8 ... the topic of another thread .... :)

=C2=A0
Can Chinese character be displayed = correctly when there is no zh* setting in LINGUAS variant?
--bcaec520e5213e5df704a31e350c--