From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-121350-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>) id 1Q7RXv-0004kv-BQ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 12:09:15 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 12ABC1C063; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 12:07:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yi0-f53.google.com (mail-yi0-f53.google.com [209.85.218.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D95B11C063 for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 12:07:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yia25 with SMTP id 25so825216yia.40 for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 05:07:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=s+BLYcHNlWP1Zv0ckJvLCTBEqGGtOjdVSrIN3oYQNSQ=; b=L9sCHK4eXx9Ba3pslOca1bIJMvJ665CZztKs8JrAZVS5BR47P6Mw1ayIjokGlugzs+ UktjNwYPbyfcwi8I2AFrBC5ICqTVLWS40QrNfpJzWvo73cN+PQzFxHUysyyEZaEuKNOO Y6bu4kMzSB5VLKtQ9wG1aFzVc3C5YVSSSbsTM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=RLt6y0/y1h1zyzw7nZHZG/fLvaFvL3y1BEqQKc/6tBqioEVAYVg4clMZJwBDUeDzTz 90J8yEkF5N3tYaEVm88IJb2+/LQSkGHVmCuZV8CUGUU9MjGwPa7afaJMjV7UMLy8SoGt SBqVfqDZkM+azF9MORHDR6AefTsz+iRxodwIY= Received: by 10.151.158.18 with SMTP id k18mr1758058ybo.299.1302091669148; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 05:07:49 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.147.82.1 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 05:07:29 -0700 (PDT) From: fei huang <daniel.huangfei@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 20:07:29 +0800 Message-ID: <BANLkTimbVtEXmqY1O8SgXCCmL9tgmRERWQ@mail.gmail.com> Subject: [gentoo-user] how ati close source driver works with console framebuffer? To: gentoo-user <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015174ff64067956304a03ed7a0 X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 3c6f8a20f9656b287615256467eaa79c --0015174ff64067956304a03ed7a0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 hi all, I use ati-drivers started from 10.11, and replace my radeon driver from xorg-drivers, the documents already mentioned my previous working radeonfb drivers will no longer work, but no any solutions for user who is willing to use framebuffer console as before. I googled but no luck, some says vesa works, but seems not working for me. any advices pls. thanks fei --0015174ff64067956304a03ed7a0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <font size=3D"2"><font face=3D"courier new,monospace">hi all, I use ati-dri= vers started from 10.11, and replace my radeon driver from xorg-drivers, th= e documents already mentioned my previous working radeonfb drivers will no = longer work, but no any solutions for user who is willing to use framebuffe= r console as before. I googled but no luck, some says vesa works, but seems= not working for me. any advices pls. <br> <br>thanks<br><br>fei<br></font></font> --0015174ff64067956304a03ed7a0--