From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QM7H9-0004eO-83 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 16 May 2011 23:32:35 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9AB971C21F; Mon, 16 May 2011 23:30:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qy0-f174.google.com (mail-qy0-f174.google.com [209.85.216.174]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E01F1C21F for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 23:30:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk7 with SMTP id 7so1785626qyk.19 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 16:30:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=PJZkXF1NytTqZxISxWgVyvnnWfKgh1pK8AfbhfAKbGY=; b=v9Yh88a+2AIBKJEbI11Z1haE2St6Eg9pvGyQjaBuCRKm79j5wxsgjQeWnRF7nV78Ds AOAs9yP9/9mgvBmzLNAfyUl1AI172XGvF31Nfpn4YupWARXF1RMLQteoRILj4kujfk+0 GDHQAu0uLTwhwZW28NBaWcVuJtRNI2AJmy3Vc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=GgccoBAQgKe/J1JjtANd8TdgswVeN/W7H0wOH8siqGZjAUm3MriC10EFZ4To37rppy wChOlVXt+e0rKtK8lcnSxTE7nF7Xt8iIaTBEnnBFkrtKM3AX+U4PcrUnxcf2xKwmYr/c b1Id6mo2PNiIH4/HCmTD5tCLS4nVISEugD3EA= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.78.156 with SMTP id l28mr3707773qck.295.1305588619825; Mon, 16 May 2011 16:30:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.215.20 with HTTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 16:30:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201105121315.53160.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> References: <201105121315.53160.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 09:30:19 +1000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Prevent depclean from removing Python-2.6? From: Adam Carter To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00235446fb80e8547504a36d0986 X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: f6ba9dd3af46a334cab5bdaf56a82ca6 --00235446fb80e8547504a36d0986 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > > +1 It bit me, and just seems stupid. > > +1 > > I like Neil's suggestion - eselect can put packages it knows about into a > specially-named set. > > I've logged the bug; http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=367611 Based on the quality of Neil's posts i'm sure you're right, but i'll leave the devs to choose the solution. I've just requested the check in the bug above, not make any suggestions on how to implement it. --00235446fb80e8547504a36d0986 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> +1 =A0It bit me, and just seems stupid.

+1

I like Neil's suggestion - eselect can put packages it knows about into= a
specially-named set.


I've logged t= he bug;
http= ://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D367611

Based on the quality= of Neil's posts i'm sure you're right, but i'll leave the = devs to choose the solution. I've just requested the check in the bug a= bove, not make any suggestions on how to implement it.
--00235446fb80e8547504a36d0986--